this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
62 points (68.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27006 readers
1283 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

No more men's and women's league, no more "gender eligibility" requirements, a common dresscode, same standards and rules for all.

Edit: since it looks like people missing the word let: the suggestion isn't to force desegregation. It's to allow it or even make it the default. Someone else made a good suggestion: segregate by attributes specific to the sport. In boxing it's weight class, in basketball it could be height, in biking it could even be doped and non doped. Sex and gender need not be the very first thing to segregate by.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 92 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Not if you value women participating in sports.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] paf0@lemmy.world 57 points 2 months ago (13 children)

No, men and women are not physically equal.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Most professional sports in the United States don't have any policies against women being in the sport. NBA, Football, Baseball, Hockey, etc.

None of them exclude women from playing in the professional leagues. Baseball did briefly in the middle of the 1900s, but that policy was reversed

It's just that, for these sports, the best women in the game have not yet been better than the worst men in the game. A woman and a man of equal height and weight are still not generally physically equal. Muscle composition and growth, bone structure, etc. mean that on average, women are less strong and less explosive than men, and most popular sports emphasize those attributes.

WNBA teams would often scrimmage against male pick-up basketball players for practice, and they would also often lose. These were just random guys in the area, many of whom didn't even play often.

The US Women's National Team played against FC Dallas's under-15 boys squad and lost 5-2. That USWNT went on to win the Olympics and the women's World Cup. The Australian women's team lost to U15 boys 3-0 and again to another U15 boys team 7-0; Arsenal's woman's team lost 5-0 to a U15 boys club; the professional squad Athletic Feminino in Spain lost to a U16 boys squad 6-0; and there are many, many more examples.

There is some research on evolutionary theory specifically about the vast differences in upper-body strength: "But even with roughly uniform levels of fitness, the males' average power during a punching motion was 162% greater than females', with the least-powerful man still stronger than the most powerful woman. Such a distinction between genders, Carrier says, develops with time and with purpose."

There are very few sports where this would be feasible, and most if not all those sports are not well-watched and make very little money: shooting, archery, ultra-marathons come first to mind.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Muscle and bone density is a big differentiator. When I was younger I dated some women who looked very strong. Like, their legs were three times thicker than mine. Yet when it came to actual strength, their legs were a tenth as strong as mine. It was actually kind of shocking how much stronger my legs were than theirs, considering the visual differences. It wasn't until later in life that I learned about the muscle density differences between men and women, and then it made sense. My legs felt like slabs of iron when you touched them. Their legs, despite looking outstanding, still felt fairly soft. That's because of the differences in muscle density between biological males and females.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Same dress code, standards and rules absolutely - regardless if competition is split or not.
Same competition definitely for some sports - chess and shooting come to mind.

More physical sports - I'm undecided there. I'd support everyone competing together if for example weight categories are introduced. You don't want people of widely different physical build competing together, it's not fun either to watch or play.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's already how it works. 80kg boxers don't compete against 100kg boxers, division 1 teams don't compete against division 5 teams.

It just means that some teams will be mixed. We might even be surprised at how many teams will be mixed.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't want to see a 80kg male boxing against a 80kg female. I already know how that is going to end.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 27 points 2 months ago (8 children)

You should probably look up the effects of testosterone. Namely upper body strength and bone density. Women are weaker than men.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] p3n@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The thing people do no appreciate about professional and Olympic level sports is just how far the male athletes are beyond the athletic ability of the average man.

There seems to be a notion that just because someone is a male they get to compete at the highest level of sports. This is simply not the case. The vast majority of male athletes will never even come close to reaching a professional level. Even an above average male college athlete has a snowball's chance in hell of making it in a league like the NFL.

When we are talking about women competing with these men, we aren't talking about competing against men with average or even above average ability (professional female athletes would mop the floor with men in the 60% percentile) we are talking about competing against the top .000001% of male athletes.

Women not only have a biological disadvantage, they have a population size disadvantage. Far more boys and men compete in sports and games. I don't care what game or sport you are competiting in, if you have population A containing 100 randomly selected competitors and population B containing 1000 competitors, you don't have to be a statistician to figure out that your #1 competitor and probably your entire top 10 are going to come from population B.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 24 points 2 months ago (6 children)

No, because the women would be at an unfair physical disadvantage in most sports.

I watched the speed rock climbing (sorry, don’t know the official name) during the Olympics. The fastest woman was amazing, she flew up the wall in about 6.75 seconds, and beat her nearest competitor by over a second to win the gold. The fastest man was nearly 2 seconds faster again with his competitors not far behind. If the women competed with the men, the female gold medal winner wouldn’t even be on the podium.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Problem is that some sports are really unfair towards one of the sexes (and it's not always men who have the advantage). I definitely think it should be mixed for sports where there's no advantage.

Relevant recent YT short about archery: https://youtube.com/shorts/oCi_IawIFQA

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 20 points 2 months ago (4 children)

In Finland we have lower physical requirements for women to get into the police academy. I think it's safe to say that with equal requirements we wouldn't have a single female police officer in the entire country.

I'd expect a similar thing to happen in sports. When it comes to physical strenght men have a massive advantage over women. It would be the women who this screws over.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Yes, let's have a bunch of blokes beating the shit out of women in boxing. What could possibly go wrong?

I remember the Brit Awards scrapping gendered awards and putting everyone in the same category. The problem was, the only ones nominated turned out to all be men.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That would just be men's sports, which in fairness is all most people seem to care about anyway...

[–] Flipper 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not every sport. Dressage is already a sport where there is just one category. Synchronous swimming is also one, but only women competed this year.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Venus and Serena got their asses handed to them in their prime by the ranked 203 male tennis player.

https://www.theguardian.com/observer/osm/story/0,,543962,00.html

The women's US National team lost to a regional U15 boys team.

cbssports.com/soccer/news/a-dallas-fc-under-15-boys-squad-beat-the-u-s-womens-national-team-in-a-scrimmage/

Physiology, males are bigger, faster, and stronger. It is not fair to women to put them in the same contest as males in any sport that requires those 3 things puts women at a massive disadvantage and would lead to fewer opportunities for female athletes to succeed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JASN_DE@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk 14 points 2 months ago

The only sport that is a predominantly physical exercise (so excluding things like snooker, darts, archery etc) where women could compete competitively against men at an equivilent level in their sport (league 1 men vs league 1 women) would be ultra marathons. Most other sports is so mis-matched you'd end up with some random amateur bloke against an elite woman.

Basically if you've gone through male puberty you are vastly different physically from someone who hasn't.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cheddar@programming.dev 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why? It's not like men and women are equal biologically.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Godnroc@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm all for removing gender as the first dividing line, but there needs to be some divisions in place.

As an example, in martial sports they are often separated by weight class to balance the fact that a larger, heavier person would have an advantage over a smaller, lighter person.

Without that, basketball would be dominated by the tallest people only, but that means there is no reason for anyone who isn't tall to even play the game. Break it into height classes and suddenly you meet have a league of skilled, average height players that could be very compelling to watch.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Height classes for basketball actually sounds really cool. It'd be interesting to see the different strategies that come into play when people physically can't reach the ring for example. Or at least I assume it would, I know nothing about basketball but it sounds like it'd be pretty interesting.

[–] LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

As the shortest person in most Basketball games during my childhood, I would have loved this so much! I enjoyed the game very much, but I always had to work twice as hard as my taller friends.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramsgrl909@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This post was clearly not made by a woman

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A lot of the reason for separate sports and other competitions is because of exclusion due to sexism, not physical differences. Chess for example was riddled with men who refused to play women, or share knowledge, or anything that would help the playing field be anywhere close to equal.

While it would be technically possible to force everyone together, a lot of the separation is so that training and knowledge transfer can occur, women can feel welcome to participate in the first place, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Team sports: touchy/feely becomes legal?

Individual sports: the men win nearly all.

Edit:

I agree with the argument that it would get boring to watch.

I have seen a boxing fight between a 100kg man and a 60kg woman, where she had much better skills. You could think it should be interesting, but it wasn't. It was soo boring. He kept her at a distance most of the time, and he could take her hits easily. She escaped his clumsy attacks all the time. Summary: it is soo important to find reasonable matches.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

No. It wouldn't be good for women in sport.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Firstly, most sports have an open league and a women's league. Women can play in the "men's" leagues if they are able. Secondly there is an olympic.sport where men and women compete against each other, dressage.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›