WoahWoah

joined 1 year ago
[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago

Polling is done variously and by various pollsters on: the general public, likely voters, and registered voters. Trump is about as popular across all three categories.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Worst Halloween ever.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

People like the ones you're responding to struggle to fully comprehend that they're literally attempting to characterize half the country.

A different thread wants to put them all into a "magat map." Putting aside the dubious idea that mapping the locations of a group of people they're referring to as literal vermin isn't gross to begin with, you would be mapping the location of half the population of the United States.

Harris is losing momentum according to polls and Trump is slowly but steadily rising. It's on average every other person you meet. Disparaging them does nothing except fuel the the charges of elitism, as you note.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Yeah. The surprise nominee change and DNC bumps are ebbing and the debate will likely be a blip at best.

It's like there's an unceasing gravity to Trump's numbers, like being choked by a boa constrictor. I think that's largely a result of his polling numbers being much "harder" than Harris, i.e. the percent of each candidates numbers that will never change their mind for and reason whatsoever and will always and fully support their candidate no matter what is much higher for Trump than Harris.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

So you support genocide. Got it.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Precisely. Harris is losing ground nationally and is losing ground in battleground states. Unless this debate significantly moves the needle, which I don't think it will for the very elegant reasons you summed, current trend lines indicate Harris losing steam and Trump continuing to pick up voters. No amount of wishful thinking will change that.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (3 children)
[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Well put it this way: Kamala Harris, the democratic presidential nominee, just made clear in the debate that she and her VP nominee Walz are both gun owners because it will help their campaign. So...

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Most people aren't watching it. It will be the clips and soundbytes on social media. We don't really know how the debate is going, because the actual reception of this debate hasn't fully occurred yet.

In some meaningful sense, this debate will actually be broadcast, as in seen by a broad audience, over the next 24-36 hours in fragmented form.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah except he keeps going.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

That's unnecessary simplistic. He also has the "immigrants will eat your pets" strategy.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

I wish they just had 45min clocks, and whenever their microphone are hot, their timer goes down. It would be hilarious to see Trump yelling inaudibly for the last 25min of all debates.

 

As this recently updated article discusses, while extremely unlikely, given the way this timeline is going it's possible the electoral college ends in a tie. Nate Silver projects this as a .3% possibility.

Things to think about:

  1. Only about half of the states require their electors to vote for the person that won their state. Who are the electors? Generally no one you know.

  2. If there's a tie, the House elects a president and the Senate elects a VP. Sub-consideration: it is the composition of the House and Senate after the November election that makes those determinations.

  3. This would all technically be decided on January 6th. And you remember how that went last time.

Regardless, it's highly unlikely this will happen. Still, this would be utter and complete madness. There is literally a non-zero chance we have a Trump/Harris administration. 🤣

118
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by WoahWoah@lemmy.world to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
 

Why are knife control laws so strong in the United States as opposed to gun control?

I was realizing it would be nice to have a knife with auto opening for boxes, etc., basically a switch blade or similar, and I found out that they are super illegal in my state (and/or there are length restrictions, or both sides of the blade can't be sharp, etc), but I can go into a sporting goods store and buy a pistol and ammo in under 30min.

Shooting open an Amazon box seems inefficient. What is up with restrictive knife-control laws??

 

Ok, so obviously no one here has done anything to make this world what it is. Wall Street, corporations, and racist social structures are why the world is how it is, and that is just the truth.

I don't understand why I should feel bad about anything when obviously all of these rich assholes and structures of oppression exist. I didn't make them.

Until the corporations and wealthy people change, why should I feel guilty or bad about things. This literally isn't my fault, they did this, so I just feel like I should be able to live my life and not have to worry about all this. Why can't I?

view more: next ›