this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
309 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2397 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
309
The Moment of Truth | The reelection of Donald Trump would mark the end of George Washington’s vision for the presidency—and the United States. (www.theatlantic.com)
submitted 1 month ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Forty-four men have succeeded Washington so far. Some became titans; others finished their terms without distinction; a few ended their service to the nation in ignominy. But each of them knew that the day would come when it would be their duty and honor to return the presidency to the people.

All but one, that is.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 97 points 1 month ago (7 children)

the fact that trump happened in the first place, that the GOP stole the supreme court, that NO ONE is doing anything about the blatant broad daylight corruption of the supreme court, that election boards are allowed to be overtaken by blatantly partisan GOP operatives--it all shows how fragile this country always was, held together by some nebulous nowhere-defined "honor system"

which trump threw out the window forever

even if trump loses this november, some other bloviating GOP gasbag will take his place, and it's going to be the same story every election, until there are no more elections. this has been in the works for many years

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 month ago

how readily my fellow citizens would throw

  1. deliberately enshittify the lives of the have-nots, through wage inequality, castrating education, and yes, nonstop propaganda convincing the masses to vote against their own best interests because jeeeeeeeezuzzz

  2. proceed to blame everyone's ensuing shitty life on mexicans, gays, women, black people, and anyone who didn't vote R for any reason

  3. repeat until plutocracy

  4. repeat until dictator

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem with the Supreme Court is that you need the Senate to be on board with any kind of action. Two approaches:

  • Add additional justices to make the Republicans there a minority. None of the Republicans is willing to vote for this, and nor are Manchin and Sinema, which would leave no more than 49/100 votes in favor of adding new ones. So you can't do it
  • Remove the crooks. This requires 67/100 votes. None of the Republicans is willing to vote for this, so you can't do it.

Making something meaningful happen here requires actually electing enough Democrats to the Senate to act.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I've always wondered why, if democrats could and did "pack the court," Republicans wouldn't do the same? The supreme court would end up bigger than the senate, and its composition would then always reflect the party in power. Seems like a pretty short-sighted solution. If you've got the senate numbers to pack the court, you've got the senate numbers to appoint a partisan nomination.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Republicans might, but would have a much harder time being in a position to do so, since the Democrats would:

  • add PR and DC as states
  • Enable every American to vote every time
  • End state-level gerrymandering nationally
[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

🤣 ok

[–] kinsnik@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

how fragile this country always was

i don't think that the system and country was that fragile, it did required decades of propaganda from the far right to get to the point it is now

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

decades of propaganda from the far right to get to the point it is now

thanks, once again, to the boomers

[–] Enkrod 2 points 1 month ago

Don't discount the other generations culpability in this though. Conservatives aren't a problem we can simply wait out. Newer generations are doing slightly better but even among GenZ there are many who would agree with the current system if it were more in their favor instead of the boomers. Education and propaganda are getting worse, GenZ identifies more religious than Millenials, disinformation keeps getting more and more widespread in a social media ecosystem that has - for younger generations - for better, but also for worse, largely replaced the news.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

All of civilization ultimately relies on the honors system, and nobody's ever been able to change it.

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is why people need to get out and vote. Nearly every election where Dems had over 60% turnout they have won. Reps never have changes in turnout and I think they have around 65-70% usually? All people need to do is get out and vote and these people lose their edge

[–] SeriousMite@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Even if it is impossible with the current math, it’d be nice to hear some politicians loudly calling for expanding the court or impeachment. Seems to me if we want to get a strong majority, we need some leadership that actually promises some things people really want. Aside from AOC, nobody seems to want to talk about real ways to fix the court. They seem to be content to just ride it out and hope at some vague point it gets better.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

and this is why the GOP has been working nonstop for over 10 years to undermine public confidence in the vote

if harris wins: it was rigged
if harris wins by a landslide: it was definitely rigged
if trump wins: it was still rigged but that just shows how godemperor trump is jesus 2.0

[–] Zeshade@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I always saw him like an anomaly, an unexpected improbable blip in history that may have an effect over decades but the disruptions it brought will go away... eventually.

When he came into power I immediately thought of something in the Foundation series (I try to avoid spoiling it because even if the books have been around for some time people are discovering it through the Apple TV series).

So yeah it'll get better but perhaps not in our lifetime...

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's exactly the problem: he's an anomaly, he's a one off, he's a foreign ploy, he's unique and we just have to get rid of him, and everything will be fine again, he's certainly not an outgrown of a movement thats been gaining steam for decades and points to deep systematic problems with the American politics and polity, no sir, everything else is fine, it's just him and him alone.

[–] Zeshade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I get your sarcasm. My comment wasn't meant to be that deep and yes I can see that his success is a symptom of a deeper problem. I just thought that him being almost comically corrupt, detestable and yet successful is a one off.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

...I typed out an answer in agreement, but then I remembered the folks around him, and I'm not even sure that's a safe bet anymore.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The US has been on track for Trump since WWII ended and the crazy christian sects got an ear in the government. It's even surprising it didn't happen earlier.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The dumb part is that the country is even dealing with this .... all the education, all the knowledge, all the power, all the history, all the money, all the financing, all the control, all the people ... just to lead up to a moment when they all had to decide on whether or not they wanted the dumbest politician they knew to lead them ... and they had to even debate it with themselves first.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You'd think Republicans trying to take away porn would have woken more people up.

[–] themadcodger@kbin.earth 4 points 1 month ago

"Well, they won't take away my porn, just all that freaky stuff."

[–] Soup@lemmy.cafe 17 points 1 month ago

That he’s allowed to run pretty much did it for me. I’ve little faith in America to recover from this embarrassment. But I’m here for it.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The founding fathers got a lot of things right in a broad sense. However, the lack of details really screwed us.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

The problem is that you can't write out the details of how people might abuse a system centuries hence; people are really innovative about that. What they tried to do was build a system of competing centers of power, so that so long as the bulk of elected officials were interested in doing the right thing for the country, they'd be able to serve as a check on those who aren't.

Our problem today is that we've got a major party which is interested in ending democracy, and which has a real chance of holding enough positions of power that it's not possible for the majority of the people who stop them.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

Atlantic - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Atlantic:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2024/11/george-washington-nightmare-donald-trump/679946/?gift=hz3-sGceWBq1O6I5tAqH198_69r3ruruOWXzy0oESBs
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support