aidan

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

they do it us is picked intentionally to train ai.

Yes like I said, the challenges were picked to be useful. But some form of challenge would've been chosen regardless.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

And you know, far more dense- which is the core of what makes it effective

[–] aidan@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

They embed for a reason... And the captchas wouldn't exist if they weren't embedded anywhere

[–] aidan@lemmy.world -2 points 6 days ago (4 children)

No, you’re wrong, the Traffic Light examples ARE specifically to gather data to train models.

No you're wrong, because the sites that embed those captchas on their page are not doing that to help good.

If people just wanted a good captcha they wouldn’t need hundreds of millions of photos of street lights and bicycles.

Yes, they are getting something productive out of the human labor that would be done anyways. Trust me as a web developer, and web scraper, some kind of captcha is necessary for many free services to be useful/economically viable. The core of a good captcha is just making it marginally more expensive for the scraper/bot than it is for you.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That's why companies like Oxylabs exist

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Aren’t these Captchas designed to get training data for AI models anyway?

Yes and no, the captchas are just meant to be hard for computers to solve but easier for humans. People saw that, and thought that "if we're making people do this might as well have them do something useful" not meant to be malevolent- and the purpose is still stopping bots, training them is a side-effect.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Just means they'll get harder, but maybe not for people, just needs to be harder for a computer

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Depends on the case, sometimes its unavoidable.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Anybody else would have been rendered penniless within a year, tops.

Nobody else has ever been ordered to pay that much, much less in a suit for speech. Wrongful death lawsuits are awarded less than this.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Other people see the signs than the drivers, a lot of them I think are for kids to nag their parents

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No that's more importantly because these are dogs not pandas

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'd say a big part of it is that drivers already filter out billboards, but those info signs often have important information on them that drivers are expected to read

 
 
 

The real shower thought was about movement across the highest speed we know of at the minimum distance we know of, so I divided Planck length by the speed of light.

 
view more: next ›