"A vote for Bart is a vote for anarchy!"
Aqarius
The Party cannot fail - it can only be failed.
I vaguely remember the core and the rest of the assembly being transported separately. But that was on purpose, not out of hurry.
DauT is my spirit animal
Yeah, but the people who freak out over what you wrote sarcastically also have a habit of freaking out over stuff you don't write, but they imagine you did, so I feel tailoring posts for them is a waste of time.
Man, imagine being the White House translator the next four years. Whoever wins, you'll be stuck there looking apologetically at the guests going "sorry dude, IDK either".
I'd define it as "people getting fired and profit being lost". If neither the people involved nor the overarching corporate entity suffered greater cost that the benefit, then the endeavour was a net gain, regardless of externalities.
I'm thinking of the fairness doctrine
It used to be illegal in the press too, IIRC ReagN abolished it.
Why would they? Did any of it affect them negatively?
I'm assuming that's dodgy translation of "involved in an organisation" rather than a literal "we live in a society", right?
That is genuinely hilarious.