I reeeeeaallly hate how almost all people see fast travel at plane speeds as a commodity and a basic need. It just isn't true, every flight is borrowed from our future, most of the other citizens of this world don't have access, and still people are like "8 h instead of 4 h for 1000km just isn't practical" yeah! Because it's 1000km why does everybody think their entitled to traveling by jet, when this has been a luxury not present in history, not present for most people that live right now and will not be present in the climate crisis that is our current future.... π« π« π«
this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
256 points (100.0% liked)
Europe
1666 readers
332 users here now
News and information from Europe πͺπΊ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
(This list may get expanded when necessary.)
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
8h city center to city center is pretty comparable to 4h flight 2h wait beforehand, 30m bag collection, and 2x45m to and from the airport
Also 8h is sleeper train territory. Don't consider it a vehicle, consider it a hotel teleporting you from city to city.
Sleeper trains are peak luxury travel right after private jets and yachts.
Since this is a direct route and you don't have to change trains it isn't that much of a luxury. Just bring some headphones a pillow and an alarm on your phone and you can comfortably sleep through the journey.
Sleeper trains are 40 eur for a dorm, and you skip on having to pay a hotel. That's not luxury travel.
Not if luxury means expensive only. But being transported in bed from city to city sounds like luxury to me ever if it's a cheap.
8h train journey is really nbd. Especially if it's a direct connection. On the ICE you will also get better food than on the flight, you get to stretch your legs and can bring way more luggage without paying an arm and a leg.
I'd pick an 8h train over a 4h flight for Berlin -> Paris in a heartbeat. Even if the flight would end up being slightly quicker including travel to and time spent at the airports (which it might not be). With the train you can at least sit down with your laptop or whatever and just chill the whole time. When you're flying you're spending a lot of time waiting in queues, walking around the airport and changing modes of transport.
Any flight is usually +2 hours beforehand, +1 hour after and that doesn't even include travel to a city centre.
I'd much rather travel at most 1hr more, whilst being allowed to bring my own food or drink and significantly more luggage.
Also: no (or minimal) security checks, instead of the whole Airport Security Theatreβ’
I find it depends very much on where you live. Traveling within the Schengen generally involves less time due to no passport control and even less if your airport isnβt a busy one. I can usually get away with arriving 45 mins in advance (sometimes 30) and Iβm out of the airport 20 minutes after touchdown.
Edit: I do agree with your thesis though.
Once a luxury is present for long enough, it becomes normal. You cannot be angry at masses of people for wanting to enjoy their life.
Your points are not invalid, it's not sustainable and likely won't be for some time, but many things are a luxury only available to a few in the present (e.g. MRI scans, 50" TVs, car capable of going +100km/h, 3+ electronic devices per person). No one is ready to give up their luxuries, especially when others still have more.
e.g. MRI scans, 50" TVs, car capable of going +100km/h, 3+ electronic devices per person
One of them is not like the others.
(Accessibility to MRI scans should not be luxury (as it is true for accessibility to any given medical procedure).)
what? of course i can be mad about people enjoying their life if it is causing direct harm to other people in the present and the future! why shouldnt I ? this is a zero sum game: somebody is and will be paying the price!!!
also "especially when others still have more" is considering how fucking rich we are a sentence dripping with greed.
Reminds me of this article from the Low Tech Magazine.
idk man, at least for germany i have the opposite impression: it is a integrated system and if you dont live in a large city it would be very usual to combine high speed legs with regional trains. heck i even mostly cross the dutch-german border on regional trains. in germany at least there has been a huge jump in accessibility of regional and interregio trains with the introduction of the "germany-ticket" which grants access to all public transport which is not high-speed across all germany for 50β¬ p/m (which unfortunately will already rise to 60β¬ with the start of Β΄25 which i am so mad about). I dont see high speed rail as a problem in germany.
I read the headline as "High-speed Paris-Berlin delay train service debuts" because I've been conditioned by all the news about the Deutsche Bahn.
Please say this goes through the Ardennes.
...the train will depart at 11.54am
The inaugural journey will set off from Berlin Hauptbahnhof at 12.02pm
Only eight minutes late. Not bad by DB standards.
It's already delayed a day before it is due to begin?
The DB doesn't calculate timetables anymore, they estimate them. So this is only a rough guess of when the train might or might not depart.
Love it. Truly chaotic energy.
no replacement bus... fucking lush by aussie standards.
By British train standards, that translates to ~35 minutes early
I'd probably prefer 13 hours at night over 8 hours during the day, but more trains more better.
There are night trains as well : check out European Sleepers. Paris-Brussels-Amsterdam-Berlin-Prague (including other stops).
More better is certainly bestest.
Business travel needs more connections. Itβs a start, but only a start.
Business? Why are you focusing on business travel?
Because thatβs most of the travel between European capitals, especially including government and institution work.
Tourism is a drop in a bucket.
I would really like numbers on that. Do you have them?
I donβt, but I image they exist. Itβs a pretty big industry.
Anyway, try taking an easily morning or late afternoon flight/international train on a weekday between any two European capitals and youβll see.
Of course, things are completely reversed if you travel during holidays, to/from holiday destinations and/or using holiday travel airlines.
Source: am business traveler.
Stockholm β Helsinki doesn't seem that way. Tourists, people visiting friends and family in the other country, some business people. I fly regularly, in the morning, during the day, and in the evening, on weekdays and weekends.
I flew Prague -> Brussels once and perhaps a third of the plane seemed to be commuting government people. It might have been due to the time of week though.
Pretty cool but 8 hours is still not practical for most people.
That flight is about 2 hours. But you have to account for getting to the airport, getting through security, boarding, checking bags, deplaning on the other end , getting bags, getting back to city center. That's easily an hour and half or two hours on each end.
When you add up all of that time, it starts getting pretty competitive.
Id love for more(any) high speed rail in the US.
Business travelers at that distance wont have checked bags. The timing of the route is also pretty terrible. Too early for lunch before hand in Berlin, too late for dinner in Paris. Still need a hotel in Paris.
You still lose 4 hours.
Where TF do you take your definition of practical from?
Without trying to be scientifically accurate: 8 hours has the opportunity cost of 120 euros with an hourly salary of 15β¬. Slightly better travel comfort, marginally less stress and climate consciousness need to do a lot of heavy lifting to offset the lost time compared to a flight. I don't think price competition is possible.
And of course there are people who this makes sense for. I would have taken this train on an interrail a few years ago and been happy, instead of the slow and painful connection they had back then. But you gotta have a lot of time to justify this option. Or just a very bad timing so that flights are really expensive.
You can work during Travel. With train travel youβre avoiding boarding time in which you cannot work.
To some extent, but 8 hours straight on a train is pushing it
it's not that much different from staying at home for 8 hours, you have decent food, access to a toilet, and the ability to walk around a bit.
Itβs about 1000km, so with proper infrastructure at T.G.V. speeds it should be around 4 hours. Thatβs better than air travel when you factor in the shitshow thatβs CDG.
8 hours? Not so much.
with proper infrastructure
Proper railway infrastructure in Germany? What's next, a minister of traffic who's not in the automobile industry's pocket? roflmao
There are a bunch of holes in the high speed line right now. The really bad one is Frankfurt, which has a massive terminal station, which means the train has to change direction. There are also no high speed tracks from Fulda to Frankfurt and between Frankfurt and Mannheim. Then there is an option of a more direct line from Erfurt to Frankfurt, which would avoid the high speed line via Hannover, which shortens the journey. Good news is that quite a bit of that is in the works.
Also the flight is 2h and you can probably add 2h at the airports with security control and so forth and another 2h for going to and from the airport to the city centers. So a grand total of 6h travel time for the trip.
This one is not going to Frankfurt Hbf, it's going to SΓΌd.
"High-speed"