this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
820 points (99.3% liked)

Linux

48438 readers
627 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 198 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

Ah hahahaha!!!!

Windows! Some dumbass put Windows on a supercomputer!

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 73 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 63 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Ironically, even Microsoft uses Linux in its Azure datacenters, iirc

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org 19 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Good point.

But still, the 30% efficient supercomputer.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FuryMaker@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago

Probably need one, just for the benchmark comparisons.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 95 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

So basically, everybody switched from expensive UNIX™ to cheap "unix"-in-all-but-trademark-certification once it became feasible, and otherwise nothing has changed in 30 years.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

Except this time the Unix-like took 100% of the market

Was too clear this thing is just better

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 53 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] superkret 98 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

The Big Mac. 3rd fastest when it was built and also the cheapest, costing only $5.2 million.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Interesting. It's like those data centers that ran on thousands of Xboxes

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wha?

(searches interwebs)

Wow, that completely passed me by...

[–] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I think it was PS3 that shipped with "Other OS" functionality, and were sold a little cheaper than production costs would indicate, to make it up on games.

Only thing is, a bunch of institutions discovered you could order a pallet of PS3's, set up Linux, and have a pretty skookum cluster for cheap.

I'm pretty sure Sony dropped "Other OS" not because of vague concerns of piracy, but because they were effectively subsidizing supercomputers.

Don't know if any of those PS3 clusters made it onto Top500.

[–] infeeeee@lemm.ee 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It was 33rd in 2010:

In November 2010, the Air Force Research Laboratory created a powerful supercomputer, nicknamed the "Condor Cluster", by connecting together 1,760 consoles with 168 GPUs and 84 coordinating servers in a parallel array capable of 500 trillion floating-point operations per second (500 TFLOPS). As built, the Condor Cluster was the 33rd largest supercomputer in the world and was used to analyze high definition satellite imagery at a cost of only one tenth that of a traditional supercomputer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3_cluster

https://scx2.b-cdn.net/gfx/news/hires/playstations.jpg

https://phys.org/news/2010-12-air-playstation-3s-supercomputer.html

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 weeks ago

Oh Xserve, we hardly knew ye 😢

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Mac is a flavor of Unix, not that surprising really.

[–] theotherben@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago

Mac is also also derived from BSD since it is built on Darwin

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

So you're telling me that there was a Mac super computer in '05?

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] spookedintownsville@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

Also known as Big Mac

haha

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If I recall correctly they linked a bunch of powermacs together with FireWire.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] menemen@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Surprised to learn that there were windows based Supercomputers.

[–] Spezi 62 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Those were the basic entry level configurations needed to run Windows Vista with Aero effects.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

As someone who worked on designing racks in the super computer space about 10 q5vyrs ago I had no clue windows and mac even tried to entered the space

[–] gerdesj@lemmy.ml 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

about 10 q5vyrs ago

Have you been distracted and typed a password/PSK in the wrong field 8)

[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Lol typing on phone plus bevy. Can't defend it beyond that

[–] superkret 25 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There was a time when a bunch of organisations made their own supercomputers by just clustering a lot of regular computers:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_X_(supercomputer)

For Windows I couldn't find anything.
If you google "Windows supercomputer", you just get lots of results about Microsoft supercomputers, which of course all run on Linux.

[–] olosta@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

No there was HPC sku of Windows 2003 and 2008 : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Server_2003#Windows_Compute_Cluster_Server

Microsoft earnestly tried to enter the space with a deployment system, a job scheduler and an MPI implementation. Licenses were quite cheap and they were pushing hard with free consulting and support, but it did not stick.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Wow, that's kind of a lot more Linux than I was expecting, but it also makes sense. Pretty cool tbh.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Now the real question is what package manager are they using? apt or yum? Lol

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

they specifically built it to only use snaps

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They are using pacman obviously :)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] virku@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Would the one made out of playstations be in this statistic?

[–] superkret 28 points 2 weeks ago

I think you can actually see it in the graph.
The Condor Cluster with its 500 Teraflops would have been in the Top 500 supercomputers from 2009 till ~2014.
The PS3 operating system is a BSD, and you can see a thin yellow line in that exact time frame.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] synestia@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I saw the thumbnail and thought this was a map of The Netherlands

[–] superkret 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

One of the Top 500 supercountries

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ComradeMiao@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] jwt@programming.dev 66 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

When you really have to look deep into god's mind you just have to put templeOS on a supercomputer.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superkret 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

You mean the NA/Mixed category?
Probably mostly z/OS and BS2000.
Or actually a mix between Linux and Unix.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 16 points 2 weeks ago (18 children)

Maybe windows is not used in supercomputers often because unix and linux is more flexiable for the cpus they use(Power9,Sparc,etc)

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Zucca@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 weeks ago

"Is your UNIX Linux compatible?"

load more comments
view more: next ›