this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
379 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2094 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In a lengthy report released on the first day of the Democratic National Convention, Republicans used circumstantial evidence to accuse the president of corruption tied to his son’s foreign business dealings.

House Republicans on Monday formally made the case for impeaching President Biden, releasing a lengthy report accusing him of corruption and seeking to allow his family to profit off his office in connection with foreign business deals made by his son Hunter, who has been charged with felony tax crimes.

In the 291-page document, released on the day that Democrats gather in Chicago to begin their party convention, Republicans call Mr. Biden’s conduct “egregious” and say he should be impeached for abuse of power and obstruction. But the report contains no proof that Mr. Biden, when he was vice president, engaged in any corrupt quid pro quo to benefit his son’s business partners, and Republicans admit they have no direct evidence that he ordered any interference into a Justice Department investigation into Hunter Biden.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 112 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They’ve been saying they’ll use impeachment as both a political weapon against their enemies and as a defense to their own crimes.

[–] BaronVonBort@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago

Impeach our guy for actual acts he did? Fuck you, well just SAY your guy did stuff.

Check and MATE.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Republicans used impeachment as a weapon in the 90s against Clinton, so they are just confirming they will continue.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Republicans also stole the election in 2000 - they will continue. Republicans are weird that way.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Tbf, what he did was wrong and he lied about it under oath. While it may have been petty, it’s still more than they’ve got on Joe.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think it backfired in Clinton's case. "Impeached over a blowjob", turned into more of a joke than a conviction. All that sound and fury, and Bill came out looking put upon rather than a villain.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

I think the misogyny and JFK worship made him seem cooler to a large swathe of people for sure.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Explain what was so wrong about sexual relations between two consenting adults. Also, ever have your car followed by a relentless and determined cop?

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 85 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Ok, maybe I am OOTL but didn't they try this already? And when questioned no one could find faults with his dealings?

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 64 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yes, but they also had like a dozen Benghazi investigations that never uncovered anything becsuse being wrong has any bearing on Republican actions. They know it is bullshit, but think it will rile up their base.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not just rile up their base but also sow discord and distrust among democrats, independents and undecideds. Though this is admittedly less effective when Biden himself isn't running anymore.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

They just wanna make Kamala President early, it’s fine.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Oh for sure! I just wasn't sure if this was a continuation of their previous attempt, or something new all together!

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

They've been trying since the Jan 6th insurrection failure and so far all that's come up is Republican congresspeople getting duped by foreign agents.

Still waiting for James Comer's apology and resignation

https://apnews.com/article/hunter-biden-joe-biden-fbi-informant-ec37a35b808ffedf257bb3cfb3fc9ce2

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 69 points 3 months ago

That SETTLES it! I'm NOT voting for Biden this Election ANYMORE!

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 58 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Strictly a coincidence that it was released on Day 1 of the Democratic Convention. I can't believe it. How crazy is that?

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Republicans opportunistic timing really undersells their seriousness.

That, and the lack of evidence.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When was the last time they were serious? The early 90's?

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

If you were to ask him, they are always deadly serious. But yeah I agree with you, feels like the '90s was the last time you could take anything they said as legitimate.

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 57 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“It is not necessary for the House of Representatives to show that the dealings involved a quid pro quo to rise to the level of an impeachable offense.”

You wrote 291 pages and admit, in the document, that you don't make your point?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

GOP: Your honor, we declare the accused GUILTY of all these crimes.

Judge: and what evidence do you have?

GOP: NONE BUT WE CAN YELL IT REALLY LOUD.

Judge: and what do you have to say Biden?

Biden lawyers: WE CAN YELL NOT GUILTY EVEN LOUDER!

Judge: that was definitely louder, I declare him not guilty!

[–] pastabatman@lemmy.world 51 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Remember when Trump was impeached (the second time) and Republicans argued that there was no point since he was about to leave office?

[–] Hazzia@infosec.pub 35 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I also remember when Obama was about to leave office and McConnel blocked his SCOTUS nomination because of it, then when Trump was about to leave office with less time left bent over backwards to get his SCOTUS nomination passed.

[–] 8ender@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Haha they had this all queued up for Biden but now it’s Harris and they went for it anyways

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

And guess who takes over if Joe gets removed?

[–] RangerJosie@sffa.community 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh no, anyway.

Seriously. These guys have 1 trick. And nobody cares. All that "Biden Crime Family" BS evaporated when Biden didn't swoop in to save hunter from that conviction.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 32 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Ya know what vanished faster because nobody cares? Someone trying to kill that convicted felon trump. I still laugh that it took less then 3 days for even the media to not give a rats ass about him almost dying.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 35 points 3 months ago

We only stopped hearing about it because the failed assassin was a right-leaning white male citizen of the USA, and no Republican seems to be able to make political hay out of that, so they'd rather not talk about it.

[–] RangerJosie@sffa.community 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I was in the "How could you miss" crowd at the time.

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How could you miss?

Because republicans don't actually regularly train with the firearms they own, they leverage them to project their insecurities instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vxx@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Is someone getting almost shot actually news worthy in America?

[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Lmfao oh shit that's a good point!

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Republicans are so transparent. FFS why even support them? This is just so stupid it's sad.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Because you're using logic and reason. You can't do that if you want to understand the republiQan base.

It's a cult. Very literally. There's a supreme leader who cannot be questioned, and members risk being excommunicated for speaking against the cult. Plus 100 other ways.

Extreme capitalistic (or "national socialist", or religious) patriarchy is a gun to the head. That's how it works. No discussion is requried, or wanted. Everything that seems "normal" about it is the edge of the cult where culture and language and all the human elements struggle between the cult and the real world.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 5 points 3 months ago

Watch ~~the two minutes hate~~ fox news primetime and you'll understand.

I hope you don't have hair because you'll be pulling it out listening to these assholes that live in upside down world.

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

For the important supporters, they are invested and can't cash out, the only way for them to make a return is if he wins.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They really want Harris that badly?

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think this meme really sums up current Republican feelings vis-à-vis Biden and Harris:

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is just another useless baseless tactic to

  1. Disrupt the start of the DNC
  2. Make "impeachment" seem so benign and common that that people won't care the next time a gopper is impeached for actual legit reasons
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

gopper

I hear "gopnik" is actually a word; in Russian, no less.

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

These people are like a dog with a bone, except the dog is blind and the bone is just a stick.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

They know they don't have anything, this is for the base. It's more like a man trying to trick a blind dog into thinking the stick he's giving him is a bone.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

So they're saying he got payments from people and had businesses?

Seems a lot like a certain weird old man running for president.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like Biden should assassinate some members of Congress. Let scotus figure it out

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Oh, are they that eager to put Harris in charge?

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 months ago

That Biden guy seems like he could be a criminal, they should really stop those guys from running for President.

[–] CMLVI@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

This is the same shit as before. Moskowitz offered to impeach in March this year, and they wouldn't do it. They've been claiming for years that he's done all this stuff, and he needs impeached. And then when offered a golden ticket to do so, they wavered.

There is nothing there. And even if there is, who gives AF, arrest him. I'm not losing sleep over it. They would have done it if they had the evidence before. And now, in August, with 3 months left and 2 months basically of lame duck time, they want to impeach him? It's a political stunt, nicely timed with the start of the DNC.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The butthurt are gonna butthurt.

The goopers are just so upset that they backed a criminal and that others noticed this.

load more comments
view more: next ›