CharlesDarwin

She should be glad that the cops didn't decide to give her the Floyd treatment since she was at least resisting arrest, possibly assaulting the officer. They didn't even make her get down on the ground or tase her.

Ah, ok. Yeah, that's been my experience with his fans, too. They think he's some kind of super whiz kid and get annoyed when I ask for credible evidence of this...well, more evidence than Worthington's Law anyway. And, seriously, when it comes to the likes of dimbulb donnie and melon husk, Worthington's Law is all the fanbois have.

I'm so very sick of this stupid take.

I remember getting screamed at by his fanbois when I tried to explain that he was actually an engineer, and was a shitty lying piece of filth.

I thought his fanbois are trying to convince everyone that he is an engineer? They took issue with this? What do they claim he is then?

Yep. The minute I learned who he was, my plans to buy anything from that douche were nixed. No way I'm driving around with a vehicle that broadcasts a message like that. Might as well slap one of those dumb red hats on my head, but in this case, people know that I've given money to a warped cause.

Not the least surprising given the weirdo that he is.

It's hilarious that dimbulb donnie and his slackjawed base think that anything was "debunked", LOL.

Also, the bizarre capitalization and calling himself by "TRUMP", WTAF.

....and his base hopes that dick will fuck all the right people.

42%. That’s how many debate viewers in the CBS poll thought Vance was the winner of the debate, compared to 41% who thought Walz won. Seventeen percent of viewers said the debate ended in a tie.

I think the reports of Vance having "won" are greatly overstated:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mollybohannon/2024/10/02/tim-walz-jd-vance-polls-both-candidates-favorability-increases-post-debate/

42% vs. 41%? That's well within the margin of error, LOL.

Yes. That's always the question the hard right and their apologists and the Enligtened Centrists (TM) can never answer in any serious way and that question is - how can the news outlet of a huge MNC and/or controlled by an oligarch be, in any serious way, on the left?

These unserious people keep telling me that "well, everyone just knows" or quoting polls that poll the newsreaders or the stenographers for the elite and who they are registered for, not realizing we are talking about the help, not the owners. What the help wants or who they vote for doesn't mean a fart in a high wind. It's the owners that call the tune, FFS.

Oh, my first impression was it might be WSJ. Which if those other two are supposedly centrist, but almost always side with the right, then WSJ's op-ed portion is almost cartoonishly right-wing.