this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
472 points (98.2% liked)

politics

23281 readers
2972 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Well, they did sign up for it, actually. And this is what I campaigned on," Trump said of the tariffs during an interview with ABC News that aired Tuesday.

And you can't really argue with that.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 4 points 48 minutes ago

Someone smarter than me once said:

The dildo of consequence rarely arrives lubed.......

[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 2 points 47 minutes ago

You signed up for all of it and everyone that was opposite of you told you it’s fucking predictable it was going to happen. Even yelled out project 2025, it was right there in your face. But you don’t read a damn thing, of course you weren’t going to read that book like you don’t read the Bible. Stop. Falling. For. Obvious. Bullshit.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 24 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Well, he's right on that at least.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Tbf, some of the things he said or what’s on Project 2025 is there… people just voted for him cause he said, “I’ll make your price of eggs go lower.”

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/eggs-us

Lower than the cost in September, that’s why they’re cheering him on for that

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I heard some variant of, "He lies all the time, so I don't think he's serious about tariffs/Project 2025."

Which is interesting to square with the thought of, "He tells it like it is, so I trust him."

But I don't live with chronic cognitive dissonance, which I assume these people accept as just another uncomfortable feeling humans have to live with. Like aches that persist with age, or feeling exhaustion at the thought of getting out of bed and going to work. That flicker of doubt from seeing that your beliefs contradict each other is just another sensation that needs to be suppressed and ignored.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 10 hours ago

Do we really think people voted Trump based on eggs? I think we need to read between the lines here.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't back him. I didn't sign up. Can I be excused please?

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Nope. Welcome to Democracy.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

The US hasn’t been a democracy for a long, long time.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 11 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Yes. Unfortunately we all have to suffer because a quarter of the US population is as ignorant as a box of rocks.

That being said, he also has the option of not destroying the US economy. Nobody is forcing him to recklessly abolish society.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 55 minutes ago

More than a quarter. Include everyone who didn't vote...

[–] Infinite@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 hours ago

A box of rocks would at least have the sense not to vote for a fascist criminal.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree with him on this one. Leopards meet face.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Heartbreaking: The Worst Person You Know Just Made A Great Point

From https://clickhole.com/heartbreaking-the-worst-person-you-know-just-made-a-gr-1825121606/

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 39 points 1 day ago

And not a one, including himself, understood what tariffs were.

[–] SeriousMite@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gotta read the fine print. And by fine print I mean Ariel Black 72pt.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

As if they can read.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now when we tell people they voted for this we can point them to their best buddy saying it too.

[–] yonaz@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly, this is not the policies of just one (although completely mental) guy. This is republican politics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 5 points 23 hours ago

Well I didn't back you, clown. Tariffs should then apply only to MAGAt morons and lazy ass ButBothSides types

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 131 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He also said tariffs were a tax that other countries paid...so there may have been some confusion over what exactly they were agreeing to.

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 52 points 1 day ago (7 children)

It doesn’t matter who pays the tariff. Anyone with half a brain knows that the cost will be passed down to the consumer either way.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyone with half a brain

Oops, I think we found the problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Anyone with half a brain

Trump voters

Pick one.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Idk why so many idiots keep harping on this when it doesn't matter who actually gives the money to the government, it all ends up being borne by the end consumer. If china "paid" the tariffs to the government it would be exactly the same as if the importer did in terms of overall effect.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 53 points 1 day ago (27 children)

Ok this is the third thing he says i agree with in these 100 days.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 40 points 1 day ago

Oh my God, the leopards can speak!!!

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (4 children)

One of the few times I agree with this flatulent.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›