this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
132 points (88.4% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2072 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Conservative economist Oren Cass warns that Donald Trump could jeopardize his presidency by focusing on donor and activist agendas rather than the priorities of swing voters who secured his victory.

Writing in The New York Times, Cass argues that new presidents often mistake donor interests, such as tax cuts and deregulation, for the will of the electorate, leading to ineffective governance and loss of public trust.

Cass urges Trump to prioritize issues that resonate with the broader American public to avoid a fate that has derailed past presidencies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why would he care? He can't get elected again. He's probably not even going to be alive many more years (or at least not mentally aware of anything)

[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He can’t get elected again

He's going to start talking about a third term within a month of taking office. At first they're going to write it off as "jokes" and then he's going to push it to the supreme court.

[–] Ele7en7@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Am I the only person in the world that heard him say many times that if you vote for him you'll never have to vote again? I feel like I'm going fucking crazy here.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes. He said it and he meant it.

At least ~70 million people are actually mentally ill. Don't bother trying to rationalize their actions because that will make you insane.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not mentally ill, actual fascists.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

Same thing, different names

Some of them for sure. I'd wager the largest demographic are just profound idiots in a propaganda bubble. I hope.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It scares me the way his base ate it up. What is wrong with people that they don't appreciate living in a modern democracy. Its just crazy to think of living before world war one compared to were we are at now.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Prosperity breeds discontent, unfortunately. It's human nature.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Oh he did. My only hope at this point is that he is just so self-centered he meant he didn't care about their voting anymore because he personally could never run again.

At least from a personal perspective, I wouldn't be surprised if he would be ok with closing his legacy having "won the game" by serving as president as long as he was allowed to serve with an overwhelming electoral victory.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago

Something something it’s constitutional because democrat FDR and the first term didn’t count because we didn’t get to hang Mike Pence.

/s but not really

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’m sure his Supreme Court would be happy to rule the constitution unconstitutional.

[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

As much power as they have, they can't do that fortunately. So, they'll need to get creative. Something along the lines of "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice" really means twice consecutively, so a third term is good to go. As flippant as I sound about it, it is actually a possibility if Trump survives that long and wants to run again.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, what actually stops them? Like, if they just came out and said verbatim "yeah, we dont care about the constitution anymore, republican presidents can do whatever they want" word for word as their ruling, and the president and congress are occupied by republicans with no desire to impeach them for it or refuse to enforce the ruling, what do you suppose happens?

[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 11 points 1 week ago

Before Trump won the popular vote, I'd say that would trigger a mass uprising or ignition of a civil war. Now, maybe a few protests and a riot here and there? Honestly, probably not much.

I've never been less sanguine about the United States as a nation than I am right now.

Oh if they did I'd love to see Obama throw his hat in the ring.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

"It's not enforceable" just like the 14th amendment.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Because the cons are "originalists", lol.