Maybe. I'd read a few of the other comments here though that seem to know what's involved first.
TachyonTele
Ha! I agree with you on that
I would show up to it, just fashionably late. Could be fun.
I think you found the true purpose of LLMs
-
6/5 stars.
These documents are named creatively and unnecessarily long. Combining them is smart. Probably. Maybe. Absolutely. -
7/5 stars.
The spell is easily broken by refusal to consent to them. Minus 1 points.
I can't do anymore, it's too early in the morning for this nonsense lol
The definition is not what everyone makes fun of it for.
I agree with 20-30. Stuff I've sold 20 years ago I'm not going to touch again ever. If someone gets creative with it , go for it. In my opinion.
It can be a tough call depending on what type of creation it is. I'm more undecided on how to limit ongoing properties. Life of creator? I don't know. That's tough.
I like every new article about China's solar keeps upping the number of watts.
Looks like SLAM is back on the editor menu, boys!
That was a trip. I'll up vote you for the effort and the rollercoaster ride.
Goddammit. Way to really inspire confidence and the need to make the future better.
GTA online at it's best.