this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
341 points (92.5% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2153 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I have no idea about William Hill. But the odds they describe sound about right to me, and the Nate Silver thing and the summary of Trump’s speech sound informative

inb4 BIDEN COPIUM HAHAHA etc and etc

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 208 points 4 months ago (4 children)

As encouraging as this may sound, it doesn't change anything. VOTE!

[–] knightly@pawb.social 54 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If voting were sufficient then we wouldn't be in this mess.

So yes, do vote, but you have to do more than that, too.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 50 points 4 months ago (12 children)

If your vote didn't matter, try wouldn't be trying to make it harder (or blocking efforts to make it easier).

VOTE

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I've basically given up worrying about federal politics; I STILL VOTE IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS, but it's clear they're too solidly captured by special interests to do much there. I've shifted my focus to local/municipal politics and found a lot more success there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 97 points 4 months ago (5 children)

You think everyone is just tired of this shit? Both these dudes are older than my grandfather when he died. I am fucking tired boss. It shouldn't be this crazy just to get sensible candidates who are actual human beings. It really shouldn't.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 83 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (10 children)

If only the well wasn’t poisoned with REPLACE BIDEN NOW OR WORLD WILL END ALSO KAMALA SUCKS bullshit, 5-10 times every hour, some of it coming yesterday still with fresh Cyrillic in its video description, we could have an adult conversation about what a good Democratic strategy would be, so that the end of the world doesn’t get elected

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago (1 children)

God yes I've seen so much of this lately.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 17 points 4 months ago

It’s like a fuckin typhoon

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Trump wouldn’t be the end of the world. Don’t be so dramatic. He would be the end of The United States, and at most the human race. But there’s basically no chance he could destroy all life on earth.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely correct. But even if the choice is a shitty one it's also a very easy one. If you want fascism, vote for Trump. If not, vote for Biden.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 33 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Or whoever the Democratic nominee is

There’s a perfectly reasonable conversation to be had about replacing Biden being a better strategy. 10 seconds of thinking will lead one to realize that figuring out the strategy, and then switching to it, is way better than dumping Biden and then figuring out the strategy afterwards. And, it’s notable that all the same outlets who are openly hostile to democracy in the United States were the ones that were pushing so hard on the backwards version of the strategy, until the more gullible parts of the Democratic Party apparatus eventually picked it up and started running with it.

The forward strategy is still fine. The loud preemptive drumbeat of hard criticism of Kamala that is now emerging, though, should hopefully serve as a big loud blaring fucking wake up call to anyone who is sincerely interested in defeating Trump who is still echoing the backwards version.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm not voting for either candidate, I am voting for the people around Biden and against people that support P2025. Pretty simple.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 81 points 4 months ago (21 children)

I can't keep up. Is Trump losing or is Biden losing? It changes every 5 minutes.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 145 points 4 months ago (10 children)
[–] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 23 points 4 months ago

You got me there.

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago

Biden was and will be another good president. Stop allowing perfection to be the enemy of good.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The answer is no one knows. If you care, vote and don't be complacent. Even if the news decides they think they know, they still don't know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They're competing to be unelectable and both winning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

The person losing more is the one that most recently opened their mouth and reminded voters who they are.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

While it looks like half the country is split between this dipshits, in reality the majority of Americans agree on a shockingly high number of issues.

One of those issues is that both options are fucking awful, so who's "losing" harder is matter of witchcraft at the moment as things violently spiral into the ridiculous

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

in reality the majority of Americans agree on a shockingly high number of issues.

And it's exactly why I say this every single day in some comment or another: I FUCKING HATE PROPAGANDISTS!!!

What you said is absolutely true and without the likes of Fucker Carlson, Sean Hamface, and Laura Inbread, we'd actually have some fucking semblance of unity and solidarity... But no, we get divide and conquer... Hate hate hate hate. Fox primetime is literally the "two minutes hate" from 1984 with an ever changing Goldstein.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Biden is not really that awful as an option, as far as it goes. If he is in decline, he steps down after the win. It's not like Biden as a choice is comparable to donnie as a choice. They are night and day.

Now, trying to sell Biden as a product to "independents" (aka, the low info) because we sell politicians like the way we sell consumer goods like fizzy sugar water - that's not so great, since the bothsiderists keep acting like they are equally bad options.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 10 points 4 months ago

Just vote, volunteer to help give rides to people that wouldn't be able to vote without it. If everyone votes, there will be no chance for the racist rapist with 34 felonies that has said on record that he will be a dictator.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 61 points 4 months ago

Not because he's a fascist child dilldler, because of his last speech.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The people that vote for trump don’t care.

Christ, they wear diapers and put fake ear bandages on. You think they give a damn about what’s actually right?

[–] Schorsch 9 points 4 months ago

Trumpism is nothing less than a fascist cult.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Look what was the big things coming out of the RNC.

  1. A bulldog
  2. The troll that protects the water hazards on Trump's courses (Kimberly Guilfoyle).
  3. The shocked remains of Florida pedo (Matt Gaetz).
  4. Racist, washed up, whats to fuck his daughter (Hogan).
  5. The UFC (Dana White).
  6. Shit kid rock song
  7. The most gay entrance you could do outside of Vegas or Broadway (Trump).

No one cares except MAGA country. It is boring.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget the crashing of Grindr in Milwaukee

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That was probably the most exciting part of the week. Republicans being free to be themselves until the servers crashed.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It'd be funny if Grindr were to have some "leaks" and some of the hateful closet cases were outed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 25 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry but "BIDEN COPIUM HAHAHA" is right.

The William Hill odds of a Trump victory in November lengthened from 2/5 (71.4 percent) on Thursday before his convention address to 8/15 (65.2 percent) on Friday.

Donald Trump remains the overwhelming favorite

This same agency is saying Kamala Harris already has better odds of becoming President than Joe Biden does, even without a decision to resign from Biden.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Paying out higher (better) odds means you think they’re less likely to win

Edit: They were initially confused about how betting odds work, now they’re confused about how outcomes work.

William Hill is saying that Trump has a 65% chance to win, and the Democrat has roughly a 35% chance to win, and that Democrat is much more likely to be Kamala than Biden. There is absolutely no conditional involved in this odds presentation that would imply who has a better chance of beating Trump, as separated from the question of how likely the Democrats are to replace Biden.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Okay, Democrats, what's the play here then? Better ride this news with some really strong moves to amplify the impact. Don't fuck it up, PLEASE.

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Expecting the Dems to do a 180 and actually not fuck up is a bold expectation. JFC we need more agile leadership...

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Dems: We have heard your complaints. We have elder abused Biden until he agreed to step down and make way for a younger contender:

Hillary Clinton!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

CNN, NBC, and NPR are working overtime to glorify second coming of Lord Agolf Shitler

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Newsweek seems to be the only publication making these claims. We’ve had some 2-3 weeks of Newsweek reportage of the Trump campaign floundering, its wheels falling off, and it circling the drain. Given Newsweek’s right-wing ownership and recently poor reputation for facts, it does feel like an op (perhaps to lull progressive campaigners into a false sense of security?)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago (3 children)

So I think we are in a post 2016 news cycle so even though an assassination attempt is kind of historic, it’s not that big of a deal in 2024 when I’m sure next week we will get another huge earth shattering news. Maybe this time Putin finally croaks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Polls mean nothing, vote as if the end of the human race was at hand.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Let's all hope that donnie's chances slump to zero.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Well that's a click bait title. It's based on betting markets that the head line completely misinterprets. The article itself admits Trump is still the favorite by far.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago

Over the same period, Biden's odds of securing reelection later this year deteriorated substantially to just 12/1 (7.7 percent) as the president faces pressure from within his own party to withdraw from the race.

Donald Trump remains the overwhelming favorite, but his odds have lengthened a touch – now 8/15 to return to the White House.

Yeah...

[–] wieson 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So when he droned on about Hannibal lecter, was he trying to talked about Hannibal Barca?

(I don't want to listen to the speech)

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (4 children)

No. He literally thought that Hannibal Lecter, the fictional murderer and cannibal from the film "The Silence of the Lambs", was both dead and also a great person. And no, the person who portrayed the character of Hannibal Lecter, Anthony Hopkins, isn't dead either. Also, that was a speech from a few weeks ago I think, and not the RNC speech, which was also unhinged and devolved into a Trump rally attacking Biden and prominent leftists rather than the "call for unity from a changed man" we were promised by bad faith right wing media outlets.

Trump's brain is just as much a pile of mush as Biden's is at this point, but at least I know in the moments of lucidity that Biden has, he's effective at the job and does the right thing. Can't say the same for the 34 time convicted felon running for re-election after he failed to steal the last one.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

IMO the senility of either candidate is beside the point because they both have teams that will keep things running when they can't. Hell, those teams keep things running even when the president can because it's not a job one person can do alone.

The difference is Trump's team is openly planning fascism while Biden's team has to at least pretend to be opposed to that or risk more people accepting that neither party wants to oppose the ruler class.

The only time a president being lucid matters is when the president disagrees with their team, that disagreement matters for the people, and the president is on the good side of the disagreement.

And in this case, I can't see any disagreement a lucid Trump has with his team having a good option for the prime or any disagreement a lucid Biden has with his team having a worse outcome than Trump's team gaining power.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

what's with the guys wearing cheese hats is that a wisconsin thing?

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 10 points 4 months ago

definitely a wisconsin thing. I had a foam cheesehead when I was a kid.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›