Bluefalcon

joined 1 year ago
[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 hours ago

Sounds like possible lung scarring will be reporting soon.

Uncle Tom is back in the news.

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. created this monster. So yes the supreme court created this issue.

Never had issues with the Pixel 2 XL. The reader worked great. Even with stuff on my hands it would still work,eventually (2-3 tries). It picked up great with dry hands.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 105 points 3 days ago (10 children)

I miss the physical fingerprint reader on the back. Plus you could program it to pull your notification screen down.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 60 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They want to creep on people. The don't care about the kids. They want to look at their daughter's friends or the woman down the roads account. Fuck All Cops

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 3 days ago

Before he obtains the tri-force of power and becomes unstoppable.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 90 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Brett Favre (Former NFL QB) was part of the theft. He stole $1.1 million from Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program to build a volleyball court. Everyone that stole money deserves jail time.

https://apnews.com/article/brett-favre-mississippi-welfare-money-nfl-59d5047f9e8b1cd6055f13697eea7027

Not the company you want giving you advice on chemical usage.

Shit, they probably have the sign for sale now.

Shit, i had my money on Hobby Lobby, Tractor supply said "hold my beer!"

 

Didn't take companies long to stop pretending like they care. We are fucked.

 

This would be a quick way to see of it's racist, close minded, or just straight bs.

Ex1- You want women to kill babies, boy!

Ex2- You want to feed the homeless, boy!

 

"Until sentence is imposed, all individuals covered by Paragraph (b)" -- referring to members of the court staff, the district attorney's staff and their families -- "must continue to perform their lawful duties free from threats, intimidation, harassment, and harm," Merchan wrote in the ruling.

And although he struck the portion of the gag order pertaining to jurors, Merchan wrote that it would be his "strong preference" to extend those protections because there remains "ample evidence to justify continued concern for the jurors."

Someone help make sense of this. Why would you lift the gag order off jurors but not yourself?

 

"Until sentence is imposed, all individuals covered by Paragraph (b)" -- referring to members of the court staff, the district attorney's staff and their families -- "must continue to perform their lawful duties free from threats, intimidation, harassment, and harm," Merchan wrote in the ruling.

And although he struck the portion of the gag order pertaining to jurors, Merchan wrote that it would be his "strong preference" to extend those protections because there remains "ample evidence to justify continued concern for the jurors."

Someone help make sense of this. Why would you lift the gag order off jurors but not yourself?

view more: next ›