this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
630 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19145 readers
2197 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 96 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Absolutely! This is the story the media should focussing on.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

the story the media should focusing on

Yet, the next twenty weeks they will pivot back to a bad debate not his performance, not his many accomplishments 1 , 2. .

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I understand that people are frustrated with inflation and the status quo. Shit keeps getting more expensive and everyone feels like they're falling behind. It's easy to blame the current leadership and say Biden isn't doing enough.

The problem is, Trump and Republicans literally have no solution for this and will only make things exponentially worse. I have this sinking feeling that more and more people are willing to vote for Trump just because they want something different. But to me it feels like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 63 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It took an investigative news team and one of the nation's top media organizations eight years to figure that out?

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

NYT has been covering for Trump this whole time. Go watch their recent video about Project 2025. It's the most watered down BS that tries to absolve the orange turd from being responsible for it.

IG link

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

No. As an Opinion column, it’s essentially invalid. They can have an opinion column to reinstate the monarchy. And doubtless have.

[–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 4 months ago

Yeah we know

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 46 points 4 months ago

donald trump is unfit to exist.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 45 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The same New York Times that put up an Op ed from political expert George Clooney yesterday telling Biden to step down. Gotta get the outrage clicks from both sides I guess.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (10 children)

But he should.

Well, except that apparently the replacement the DNC has in mind is Kamala fucking Harris. I knew it'd be too much to expect them to grow any balls.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Biden should use the recent President is King supreme court ruling to declare both of them unfit to run again.

The new candidates would be roughly on a level playing field to start and hopefully it would open up a extensive conversation about that ruling.

[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I don't think it matters too much how he does it but he really needs to test that ruling because that's the only way it's going to get any restrictions put on it

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

The only restrictions are going to be based on which party the president is a member of.

[–] kubica@fedia.io 5 points 4 months ago

We can dream.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] RippleEffect@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

We need this from the New York post or one of those sites.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 26 points 4 months ago

He wasn't fit to lead eight years ago either.

[–] rustydomino@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago (2 children)

NO SHIT. jeezus h christ NY Times tell us something we don't know.

[–] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

Having continuous pieces like this make a difference. Think of how many "Biden has to step aside!" pieces have been written in the past two weeks and how much a part of the political discussion that is. The more time the media takes up shouting from the rooftops that Trump is a threat to America, the more mainstream and central the discourse becomes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 24 points 4 months ago (40 children)

Meanwhile, America ignores this obvious fact to instead focus on….

“BiDeN oLd!”

More news, as it develops.

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (6 children)

FUCK NYT. This opinion is like broken clock being right twice a day.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Remember folks


this is an opinion piece, it is not news.

The reason you may hear more news about Biden being unfit for office than Trump being unfit is in large part because many Dems are calling for Biden to step aside, and it is newsworthy that a candidate faces calls from his own party.

The GOP is not widely calling for Trump to step down.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

And frankly his antics have become normalized.

I read a few pieces saying some political journalists will retire if Trump becomes president, simply because covering him was so exhausting and stressful. I imagine many are still sick of it, and think covering him just gives him more attention anyway.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago

And the reason many Dems are calling for him to step aside is because of the snowballing effort of the media to push this story.

I'm not going to argue he's not old, or too old to be president - I had that opinion four years ago. As is Trump too old to be president.

What's insane to me is that there's no counter argument. There are no stories about all the accomplishments his administration has had. How incredibly productive he's been and how much better off this country is today than it was four years ago. The News is not reporting the news - they're reporting speculation. All I see is people complaining about the economy and immigration while no one is pointing out what Biden has done, or has tried to do, to help these matters. The only image they have is of an old man stammering over the course of two hours out of three years.

It's reasonable to assume that most Americans have no clue what the Biden administration has accomplished because the news rarely reports it. And now, in a moment when a wave of opposition is building, you'd think someone - the media, members of congress, Harris, Obama - would make an effort to defend the guy and at least offer some tangible, verifiable actions taken in the past three years.
Here's a few of the first results I found...

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/02/02/joe-biden-30-policy-things-you-might-have-missed-00139046

https://www.whitehouse.gov/therecord/

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-opinion-biden-accomplishment-data/

https://joebiden.com/accomplishments/

https://www.factcheck.org/2024/01/bidens-numbers-january-2024-update/

https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-biggest-achievements-first-year-president-1670763

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2024/04/07/introduction-who-got-more-done/
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2024/04/07/trump-vs-biden-who-got-more-done-for-families-and-workers/

https://www.politifact.com/personalities/joe-biden/
https://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/?ruling=true
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/?ruling=true

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So much so he has the ability to get people to support Biden. Amazing stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Water is wet.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

That's just, like, your opinion man. (But fo real mine too)

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago
[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Some one should tell his voters that.

load more comments
view more: next ›