this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
578 points (98.7% liked)

Greentext

4488 readers
656 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 170 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Don't end it Anon, you just struck it rich my dude. The police tear apart your parents home looking for a nonexistent meth lab run by a nonexistent student and a photo as evidence which is a top search result?

The police union basically just handed your family 10 Million Dollars after a brief lawsuit against the city.

Maybe, but it may take a couple years to see any of that money...

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't think cops are liable for damages even in a case like this.

Probable cause is a whole ass bitch.

[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Plenty of places would happily pay a couple of million not to find out

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

10M was a stretch for sure, but a family in Jolliet recently got 2.9M USD for the police raiding the wrong house and quite a while back Dr. Lawrence Crosby got 1.25M USD for the police arresting him for the theft of his own car based on an anonymous tip, which is about as much "probable cause" as this case.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 121 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Man, that might happen for a high profile family/person. For average people in many places in the US, they'll be lucky if the police even pay out to cover damages to property, nevermind anything else.

Edit: and yes, I know this is just a green text and not a real story.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They'll be lucky if the police don't kill them in the raid.

Very easy to tell whether they will get killed during the raid, simply follow the Standard Police Academy Appropriate Force chart:

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And anywhere outside the US, home searches are nearly always legal since they must be signed by a judge. And judges rarely rule against their own.

Over here in Germany, where the inviolability of the home is in the constitution, the suspicion of any crime suffices for getting your home searched. This includes filesharing, spraying graffiti or insulting someone on the internet by calling them a dick. Plus, any resulting damages are only paid if you are found not guilty.

[–] cheers_queers@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

calling someone a dick is a crime??

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

https://archive.is/RsyNC [unpaywalled Washington Post link]

Some reactions:

The text above reads: "Special Police Unit Wall and Color"

The text below: "Andy, you are such 1 dick."

Later the police arrived:

But again:

And the cops came back:

But finally:

By the way, the case was finally dropped. Only because the outrage made them not pursue it though. Courts would have likely ruled this was an insult.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's wild that insults are a crime there, I never knew that. Quite funny back and forth, though. I laughed at how the writing got more and more chaotic haha

As for your other comment, the US also requires a judge to sign off on a warrant for raiding/searching someone's home. Some judges are more strict about it than others, and the more high profile you are, the more the judges tend to be stricter with approving them.

However, if you're in a poorer area and you're not rich, it's not unheard of for home raids to occur quite liberally. Hell, one of my old coworkers got raided a few years ago due to the police going to the wrong address (the intended house was across the street). And no, the police didn't give shit for compensation and his family couldn't afford to take it to court. He also just didn't want to deal with potential repercussions of the police harassing him afterwards since he's an immigrant (here legally, but yeah, lots of people here don't care about that...).

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There are tons of examples counter to your claim.

A lot of the settlements probably don't even get reported on at the request of the city in question.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While true, your hypothesis doesn't take into consideration how often the police fuck up.

And you don't seem to take into consideration how rarely people sue. A lot of open and shut cases aren't pursued because the public doesn't know they can.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, 10 million might be a stretch. But the city I used to work in would immediately settle for 250k for something like that. Lawyers are expensive, and losing is more expensive

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

10M was a stretch for sure, but a family in Jolliet recently got 2.9M USD for the police raiding the wrong house and quite a while back Dr. Lawrence Crosby got 1.25M USD for the police arresting him for the theft of his own car based on an anonymous tip.

[–] Szyler@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those are accidents vs the op which was not an accident. It was legit the right place and searching for the right thing. They had some evidence to do the search legally. So your comment and this hypothetical aren't quite the same.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The judge and jury don't know about the accident. The judge and jury will see that police raided an older couple's house based on at most a stock photo, an anonymous tinder account, a photo of school laboratory from an unknown source (anon's not even a real chemist), and an IP address which can be spoofed.

In fact, they don't even know anon is involved at all.

A brief lawsuit that will only exist if you are wealthy or can find contingency representation.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 75 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I really thought anon had a plan here

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I mean having a lot of rock will get you laid, but not with tinder hotties

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

If your standards are low enough, even a bump could get you laid. You'll definitely get a variety of STDs though, and maybe get robbed as well.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, everyone wants some drugs. The girls, the police, ...

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 day ago

"The pd reportedly found 39 lbs of drugs at the premises, which took several trips to transport as the 35 lbs were found to be very volitile. So volitile, in fact, that by the time it had reached the locker, the 20lbs had decayed into 5lbs through natural breakdown. The department is looking to press charges for the 1lb they found, but it is unlikely that the defendants will see any prison time as a gram is not normally considered a serious crime."

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 97 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"Hmm yes let me talk about a very illegal schedule I on an app that has access to my exact device location 24/7"

Most intelligent greentexter

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Desoxyn is schedule II though. Still shouldn’t talk about manufacturing schedule II drugs illegally.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 55 points 1 day ago (4 children)

To be fair. Joking about committing a crime is not illegal.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Pretty sure it doesn’t have to be illegal for the cops to turn your life inside out.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Absolutely, but i would call that the problematic behavior rather than the student committing a edgy joke.

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, it seems like reasonable enough suspicion for a search warrant.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A wellfare check by a social worker maybe. Can be at school if they fear the home to be dangerous.

Combined with some extra patrol in the street because they HAVE to take things seriously.

The potential damage such a raid can do (shoot your pet, ptsd) cannot be worth such reckless behavior.

On a side note, i actually expect this post is fake.

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, it’s a green text of course it’s fake.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Or your lungs.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And the signs at aiports saying joking about bombs is illegal ? I can ignore them and crack on with my comedy bomb routine ?

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In that context the specific act of joking is a crime because it can cause huge panic to happen.

I would expand by saying that a joke about a realistic and immediate threat is not a joke at all and requires serious response to guarantee the safety of others.

A student advertising ok social media that they are looking for volunteers in a meth schoolproject is not a direct threat to others. Neither is it a believable scenario.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

yup, you can never "boy who cried wolf" yourself about possible and realistic emergency situations. Sure it sounds like a joke - but it either:

is, nobody does anything, and nothing happens

is, gets taken seriously, and some time and resources are wasted

or

isn't, gets taken seriously, and a disaster is avoided

isn't, nobody does anything, and people end up dead or injured

a small waste of time and resources is always a better outcome than possible death and injury

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

there's a difference, one is causing fear and panic.

Same as running into a movie theater and screaming fire.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is probable cause though.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago

Anyone could have created the account for the joke. Police shouldn't take social media accounts seriously

[–] rooroo 8 points 1 day ago

Very much depending on where you are. Pretending to commit or to have committed a felony (idk the minutiae of translations; Straftat in German) is one in itself over here. Fake it and instantly make it, yay!

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is why I first spoof my location to your house.

Might as well spoof it to the police station.

[–] don@lemm.ee 29 points 1 day ago

Anon always thinking behind