None. Sorry just my opinion.
Look at the unemployment numbers. Tell me it's a good idea to have less jobs.
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
59 points (89.3% liked)
Ask Lemmy
26996 readers
1491 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
CEO, politician... I guess that's it. Except I don't actually want an AI making our laws for us. That would be a catastrophe.
Scammers. They are so stupid. AI is much more convincing.
Scam detection would be more helpful
Yep
None, as long as society uses labor as a means to secure basic necessities. Shifting that towards some infinitely-scalable capital equipment owned by entities kinda fucks the whole system, don't it?
Realistically, a lot of the stock photo industry. If a few people can generate pictures on demand, you won't really need anyone doing sets, lights, wardrobe, etc for a series of generic photos .
Jobs that are done in environments that are dangerous for humans. Or at least make these jobs safer for humans.
I’m not sure which jobs this will entail, but if a technology is able to reduce dead people on the job I think it’s a good thing.
None.
None. Maybe some middle management, but even then, until AI fixes the hallucinations for good, in useless
I've met a few human middle managers who regularly hallucinated, when humans do it we call it "lying" though.
Requirements revision review. It is the most mind-numbing part of my job and fortunately only a small portion of it.
A word changes, even just punctuation changes, can change the meaning drastically. And finding that change within a hundred page document is a task humans just plain suck at. Get a computer to compare revision A to revision B, highlight the changes, then pass it on to the human to interpret the change and decide what to do from there.
Comparing version A to version B and highlighting the changes is already something software can do, so I hope that you're already aware of this. But if you're not, just know that it's out there! Lol
(UK) Government.
It could not be any worse than the most-obvious self-serving pocket-liners of this century.
no way you said this, yeah let's allow robots to rule over us. We totally don't have a billion movies and books to show why that is a bad idea
From your style of writing, you're in your teens, AI suggests. Later you may come to understand irony. Although I confess that I wrote not completely tongue-in-cheek.
You may also understand, that there are 650 elected MPs in parliament. Only a small handful are in the executive Government. The rest of the MPs or junior ministers are either cajoled by past indiscretions, a K, blackmail or thin majorities, to follow party line or are part of His Majesty's loyal opposition(s). There is room for change in the former, occasionally the trough (or whip) isn't enticing enough, and the role of HM Opposition is .. well .. opposition.
You may not realised that continuous raids on personal pensions by successive governments, and starving pensioners - of which I am not one - over the winter is a "bad thing". It is.
You may have wanted to own a home one day; you're probably going to be disappointed. I could go on but your friends who are somewhat older than you are probably already saying these things to you. Highest tax burden in living memory ..
Meanwhile, the pigs have their snouts firmly in the trough from way before Boris and Starmer all the way through.
The status quo isn't working. Something has to change.
I really hope that when you reach your twenties or thirties things really have changed, by whatever means necessary.
My first language isn't english sorry if my writing is not on par with yours. But no i didn't know this was ironic as some people in this thread seemed to be serious about it. I do understand there are problems with how things are now but AI wouldn't fix much, maybe it would help for a short while but then it would all go up in pieces.
'murica checking in.
Yeah fuck it: government. Hard to imagine it doing a worse job than we are.
Hat tip from across the pond. 🙏
Groundskeeping.
Currently very few jobs should be replaced with AI. But many jobs should be augmented with AI. Human-in-the-loop AI amplify the finate resource of smart humans.
The only full job I can think of is assistant to a busy person. I don't think any whole jobs are done better by ai. Some of the jobs recommended in this thread would be better to be removed rather than replaced.
So, I think ai makes a better assistant to a person doing a job rather than a replacement to compete a job on its own. It can write rough drafts that a talented writer can expand and edit. It can quickly generate several plans that an experienced leader can pick from or discard. It can look through a designer's portfolio and spit out "new" combinations of their past designs that the designer can then build upon.
Any one of these jobs could give up and submit the AI's output as their own, but I think the quality of the results would suffer.
none. it may help with under staffed areas for them to function a bit but it really is no good to do things on its own.
Politician
None, not because it can't but because if it does then people won't be able to make an income. This is already a problem.