It's a shame that Federal law supersedes state law, huh Texas?
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
For decades, the Justice Department has dispersed election monitors across the country to observe procedures in polling sites and at places where ballots are counted. That was a power granted to the federal government under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which outlawed discriminatory voting practices and sought to equalize voting access. After the U.S. Supreme Court gutted parts of the law years ago, the agency now must get permission from state and local jurisdictions to be present or get a court order.
SCROTUS
Honestly, I think UN monitors should be monitoring our elections at this point. The qons have no interest in actual democracy.
I'd like some monitors watching those ES&S machines in Repub states.
Oh, Christ. Here we go.
Just tell them their electoral votes aren't valid then. Shut this shit down now.
Lmao. Ted's going to lose so they are trying to steal it for him
I have nothing useful to add here. I just wanted to say that Ted Cruz is a piece of shit.
Didn't be so hard on yourself, that was extremely useful.
Canada's top export. I mean for us, not for you guys. Fucking sucks for you guys.
Clearly, but it's not really funny.
Federal law supercedes state law. While Texas can run the election, the feds have every right to have observers present at each and every count of the vote.
There is no wiggle room at all. They HAVE to be present. Fuck off, go cry in a corner, and if you get in the way, go to jail.
How I wish this were true. The Supreme Court neutered parts of the voting rights act and now the feds must ask for permission from the state. No shit.
Probably not unless the numbers swing wildly on Election Day, which is possible
But right now he has an over 3 point lead.
I just can’t imagine being someone that supports Ted Cruz, much less telling anyone about it.
They flooded the zone with bullshit polls, so they look better. Especially GröpenFührer.
VOTE!
How do you tell the world you are trying to steal an election. This is it.
They might as well say they are going to manipulate the count.
Yo! France, we might need your help.
And the Canadians too. Wicked nice, have syrup, and are located in America's Hat.
Always preferred Canada over MAGA hats 👍
I'm a Thirdie. This is Tin Pot El Presidente Dear Leader level of shit, not a first world nation.
Federal Government:
Texas: “and I took that personally”
Yes, they are.
Lol that's not a battle Texas is going to win. Federal over state.
So the federal institution just gets Texas employees to do it as members of the constituency.
so when does abbutt come up for kickout?