this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
419 points (98.4% liked)

News

23258 readers
2797 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The former Wyoming congresswoman Liz Cheney “hopes to be able to rebuild” the Republican party after Donald Trump leaves the political stage. Mitt Romney, the retiring Utah senator and former presidential nominee, reportedly hopes so too.

Among other prominent Republicans who refuse to bow the knee, the former Maryland governor Larry Hogan is running for a US Senate seat in a party led by Trump but insists he can be part of a post-Trump GOP.

Michael Steele, the former Republican National Committee chair turned MSNBC host, advocated more dramatic action: “We have to blow this crazy-ass party up and have it regain its senses, or something else will be born out of it. There are only two options here. Hogan will be a key player in whatever happens. Liz Cheney, [former congressmen] Adam Kinzinger and Joe Walsh – all of us who have been pushed aside and fortunately were not infected with Maga, we will have something to say about what happens on 6 November.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 4 points 1 hour ago

There's a middle ground. The near future of the party is Ron DeSantis and JD Vance, the smoothed down versions of Trump. I don't think that works and someone new will come out fully populist with authoritarian edges, maybe a Hispanic man to help attract the working class beyond just white people, that seems to be the growth opportunity Republicans need and maybe that solidifies Arizona/Nevada/Texas for them while they put all the effort into the Blue Wall and North Carolina.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 hour ago

I think the JD Vance "I'm a never Trumper" clip has kind of killed the title, no?

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago

Nope. Assuming that Trump loses (which I had thought was a foregone conclusion, but genocide and stupidity is a hell of a drug).....

People like being on the winning team. And having lost the popular vote three times in a row, Trumpism will start to fade. Republicans will switch to the Democrat party, cementing the current rightwards shift. Imagine the Democrats being pro-border in 2020? 2022?

The only silver lining is that in 8 to 10 years we might actually see a progressive party emerge.

If Trump wins, we get faster genocide plus Fascism at home, so at least there's that to look forward to. Hope you're practicing how to be a straight cis white male Christian because it's going to be a rough time for everyone else.

But hey, Jill Stein won't get that check from Putin unless you vote for her and Cornel West has alimony payments to make.

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 5 points 8 hours ago

Hogan is a great example. I actually wasn't upset when he won his second term as governor, even though I disagree with some of his policies - but in general he did some good stuff for Maryland during his terms. Like getting masks and covid test kits in secrecy so Trump's idiots wouldn't confiscate them, as happened elsewhere in the country.

I'll never forgive him for axing the bike lane on the new Nice Bridge; we're stuck with that decision for at least 50 years now. But, by far, my biggest problem with Hogan is the "R" after his name.

Those third-party organizations are running ads that say things like, "I voted for Hogan, but not this time - we can't let the Republicans gain power in Congress." (Other organizations are noting "scandals" for the other candidate about taking tax breaks to which she wasn't entitled, but they seem overblown. It seems pretty silly coming from supporters of the party of George Santos, Matt Gaetz, and how many others...)

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Would be wonderful if Steele only succeeds in creating a center-right party, with the GOP still existing as far-right, giving the Democrats (who now have permission to move left) a leg-up in the future.

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 3 points 2 hours ago

The Democratic Party will never move left. If our country exists in a recognizable way in four years, we need to put every Republican on trial, let the Dems be the party on the right, and start a new leftist party. Anyone with an R after their name is supporting a traitor to democracy, and is guilty of treason by association.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 42 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

No. The Republican Party is now a cult devoted to a person. The party will not be able to move on until that person is out of the picture.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Are you implying that the assassination attempt(s) might be attempts to save the GOP?

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 hours ago

Are you implying that the assassination attempt(s) might be attempts to save the GOP?

The second would-be assassin seemed to think so.

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Even if he loses this election he'll be a kingmaker behind the scenes for the rest of his life. On top of being the default candidate every 4 years until he dies.

We're gonna be deprogramming these people for the rest of our lives.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Just let them be "republicans", make a new "conservatives" party and with the fucked up system the democrats will win every time ...

Hmm...

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

That's assuming half of the less liberal democrats don't also join that new party.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Imagine two main political parties that each try to do their best for their constituents and their country, are ethical and upstanding citizens, and willing to work with their peers to build the future. Imagine choosing between multiple legitimate candidates by policy, rather than fear of fascism

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Hopefully enough people understand that the system is broken and needs some fixing instead.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 hours ago

This is exactly what I hope happens... I'm just not sure Republicans have it in them not to line up behind a flawed candidate.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 22 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Are they going to rebuild or they just trying to migrate and take over the Democratic Party? We have this tendency to assume that this country is going to be two parties just as they are right now for the rest of our time but parties have changed in America many times. Hell, these two parties virtually swap places once. Nothing says it can't happen again.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

After the dictator dies, there is always a battle of wannabes trying to replace him, a map of regional warlords trying to be the next Grand Cheetoh. Hopefully those regional warlords fall into obscurity and sanity prevails

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 hours ago

Are they going to rebuild or they just trying to migrate and take over the Democratic Party?

This is exactly what I think is happening. The result of R destroying itself is somehow turning out to be no political home for progressives and left of them in US politics.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

A lot has shifted over time, but the default state of American politics has always been two dominant parties.

That said, I could absolutely see a scenario where an American centrist party forms, still solidly to the right of most Western democracy, but centrist by current local standards, which not only pulls in the non-MAGA Republicans but also moderate Democrats, blue collar Dems from purple states, and once it gains traction and wins a few races, massive support from corporations and lobbies.

They'd win landslide victories over both older parties, especially as progressives and leftists gained greater control of the Democratic party through the flight of the moderates to the new centrist party, which would in turn drive even more establishment Dems to the new party.

They could run on nothing more than "common sense compromise, unity, and moving beyond the partisan squabbling that has plagued the country for decades", and be successful for at least 3 cycles before they even had to really take up any issues in earnest.

The deep South would stay red, the West cost, new York, and Illinois would stay blue, but I could see all of the mid Atlantic, Midwest, plains states, new England, and Southwest going for a viable centrist party.

For a long few years, national level politics would be absolute fucking chaos.

[–] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not sure about New England. New Hampshire and Maine such a party would probably work in, but I am doubtful of any of the rest. MA and VT are two of the most left-leaning states in the country.

[–] danafest@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

The current governor of Vermont is a Republican. Vermont tends to vote for the person rather than the party.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago

Considering the number of republicans who have officially come out in support of Harris, even if it's just to avoid trump, it’s certainly possible.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The brand is kind of poisoned, they should abandon it, let the wackos have it, and come up with something new.

[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Honestly, they could take over the Libertarian party quite easily. It's not like its current leadership is particularly effective.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›