this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
134 points (98.6% liked)

Fuck AI

1276 readers
359 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

Do not create the Torment Nexus.

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Implement Asimov's 3(4) Laws of Robotics.

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 35 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Silicon Valley companies yet again deciding if they should involve themselves in affairs they have no business being a part of. Where the fuck is Congress?? Oh right, eating out of these fuckers’ platinum assholes.

There’s obviously no way this could ever go wrong, Silicon Valley companies always make decisions based on what’s ethically and morally best for everyone, so I’m sure they’ll make the right call.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Don't be evil... Oh wait...

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

At long last we've created killer drones from the cautionary short film "Slaughterbots".

Of course, given how jank what we've decided to call "AI" is if you tried to make a real Slaughterbot it'd probably be blowing up random people or patches of the wall that it thought looked like a face.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago

I love the idea of a fancy autocomplete trained on Reddit and 4-chan deciding whether or not someone should be murdered or not. Sounds like a fantastic idea.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 27 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Tech bros: "But what if AI could have a little murder rampage, as a treat?"

[–] Digital_man@lemmy.one 11 points 15 hours ago

Tech CEOs are privileged people who will do what ever and say what ever to make lots of money.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Stupid looking goon

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago

“Obviously not… but, then again… money…

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Doesn’t matter because AI will be weaponized against the masses no matter what your opinion of it is. It’s the billionaires with the money and influence to make sure it becomes a weapon and they will 100% be beneficiaries of said weapons so OF FUCKING COURSE they will use it.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Speaking of things that are deadly, that mullet/soul patch combo in the preview is rough

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Yea were seriously considering what some dude that looks like that thinks about weapons?

[–] _bcron_@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

fully autonomous

How about 'what the fuck is wrong with you?'

Tech bros reinvent the button smh

[–] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 hours ago

Hack one of that automated turrets and change the promp sounds pretty easy.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The answer is no. But of course some idiot is going to do it and make the thing able to self replicate and fuel from "biomass".

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

ha ha ha, no way a farrow plague upon your house

[–] lonlazarus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 15 hours ago

It’s time to get those parts to build an EMP.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

I remember that show, maybe I should pick it back up

[–] mydude@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

This is fucking sick

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 6 points 15 hours ago

If it decides tech bros and billionaires are legitimate targets, sure.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Silicon Valley has no word in this. It's givernments who decide what kind of weapons they want for their militaries.

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 14 points 15 hours ago

Silicon Valley has lobbying money

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 14 hours ago

"What's a viable business model for all these idiot robots we keep building?"

[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

They want autonomous weapons and they want AGI to save us from climate change. I don't believe AGI will happen but they'll probably settle for faking something that fools the masses and lets them set the agenda. Then it's flame throwing robot dogs for everyone.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago

It already is

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

Ok so just imagine this guy doing a TED presentation ala Weyland in the first Alien reboot movie, and just splice that as the intro to the first Terminator movie.

[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Eventually? Maybe, but frankly Asimov had those rules for a reason. Now? It can't even decide what it said a second ago.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

The current discussions of LLM and algorithmic learning being referred to as "Artificial Intelligence", is super duper frustrating to all us science fiction fans. There is no AI in the Asmiov sense, no one is even trying to make that form of AI.

Having said all that, and this is the coldest take ever. Robots shouldn't kill people.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

At best, LLMs are a small slice of a pie that would constitute an artificial intelligence.

I suppose you could look at this 2 ways: either, when we talk about the state of AI, we could say that, yes, we have it, but only this one small part that kinda works ok; or (the more traditional route) would be to say that AI doesn’t exist until all of the constituent technologies have been both developed and assembled.

Obviously, we know which one the marketing departments of many companies choose.