Eheran

Anything against hydrogen nonsense is good. So much waste, so much additional CO2.

People are shit.

Hence my post, the relevant metric is "how much", not "if".

You seem to thinking I somehow like or whatever Russia? I am saying this so people remember that most are there for the money, not because someone forces them. Stop letting them off the hook, blaming someone else.

"after a long time" - that is exactly my point. Where do you draw the line? It will never be non-radioactive, which the headline suggest would be the case in 1'500 years. As far as we know, everything might decay after some time. It will always have some Radon get trapped in it. Scatter some cosmic rays. Blablabla.

Then how could that what you ask be the case? I can not be in such a relationship with something that is not real.

Engineer here, no, did not know. Seems like that is not the same everywhere. I also doubt that you can teach adults to be this kind of creative, let alone those that specifically choose a field where they do not need that.

So? People make shit up all the time. Unlike people, you can ask GPT multiple times and even ask for specific Google terms to check the info.

Define "waifu", then I can answer.

... What?