this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024

844 points (98.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35563 readers

1250 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.

Rules:

1. Be Respectful

Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...

2. No Illegal Content

Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...

3. No Spam

Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...

4. No Porn/Explicit

Content

-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...

5. No Enciting Harassment,

Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts

-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...

6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

7. Content should match the theme of this community.

-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...

8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.

-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense

Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world

LillianVS@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

844

Google now requires JavaScript (midwest.social)

submitted 1 month ago by m_f@midwest.social to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world

168 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Just started getting this now. Hopefully it's some A/B testing that they'll stop doing, but I'm not holding my breath

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 276 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I hate how these kinds of messages never explain WHY. It's just "Do it. Do what we tell you." 💀

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 119 points 1 month ago (4 children)

BOW TO YOUR MASTERS, AND SUCK OUR DICK!!!!

I remember 10 years ago looking at a calculator app in the android app store, and seeing the permissions. And thinking "WHY THE FUCK DOES A CALCULATOR NEED MY LOCATION, AND ACCESS TO MY PHONE CONTACTS???"

Fuck THAT.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What dick? pretty sure it's fallen off from all the STD's.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] Kyouki@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

For ads, tracking and spying of course.

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Probably because 99.999% of users already use JS and dedicating a web page to it is already more work than they needed to put into it

[–] fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it's just to avoid explaining why, and how they harvest your data. That said, I also hate how a lot of errors of the big corpo are just like "This site has an error" no error-code, no further feedback what to do etc.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 16 points 1 month ago

Because they dont need to

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] Zier@fedia.io 163 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Google is no longer a Search Engine. It is a commerce/purchase search. It's nothing more than ads and corporate results to purchase goods & services. Google Shopping has taken over Google.

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 84 points 1 month ago

https://html.duckduckgo.com/html/

[–] superkret 77 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

DuckDuckGo doesn't ;)

By the way, in my browser, the title of this post shows up as

Google now requires Javascript in c/mildlyinfuriating

which shocked me a little.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sundar Pichai is the admin for this community, didn't you know?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I know this may come off as a surprise: but I imagine that requiring JS in 2024 isn't a big deal to most people.

Now of course Lemmy skews more into that small crowd.

I don't blame any website for requiring JS for full functionality in 2024.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 56 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Google is a text input and a list of links. It should work without JS.

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

All of the people replying to this saying you shouldn't need JS are totally unaware how modern web development works.

Yes, you could do many sites without JS, but the entire workforce for web development is trained with JS frameworks. To do otherwise would slow development time down significantly, not allow for certain functionality to exist (functionality you would 100% be unhappy was missing).

Its not a question of possibility, its a question of feasibility.

load more comments (10 replies)

[–] Flipper 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For full functionality sure. For basic functionality no. Searching on Google is basic functionality I'd say.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee 60 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I love that society is basically stratifying into groups based on tech knowledge - it all seems very Cyberpunk.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (10 children)

As someone with technical knowledge sometimes I get locked out of things because I block ads or refuse Javascript. For instance, I had to turn off my pihole so I could sign into my Microsoft account to play Minecraft. Or the times I encounter a website that breaks on Firefox.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Microsoft Minecraft login thing is getting pretty insane.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (9 replies)

[–] bad_alloc@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The more technology pervades society the more pronounced this will get. The sheer helplessness of people when faced with problems that seem trivial to some is scary. Especially when you see people losing final theses or critical work related data because they never learned about backups.

Add to that tech companies trying to hide the concept of a file system, and it seems like this is by design to sell more shit.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 56 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

You're still using Google search?

[–] m_f@midwest.social 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sometimes, yeah. My default is DDG, and I also use Kagi, but Google is still good at some stuff. Guess I'll take the hit and just stop using it completely though. Kagi has been good enough, and also lets me search the fediverse for finding that dank meme I saw last week. Google used to be able to do that, but can't shove as many ads in those queries I assume, so they dropped that ability.

[–] PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Use the bangs in DDG, eg !g asks DDG to search google

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Yep. I use Noscript and DDG Lite by default. Just putting into duckduckgo: !g will search google without having to turn JS on...looks like Duckduckgo wins again, even when it comes to using google, lol.

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Who still uses Google? DDG has been way better for a long while now. Join the duck side.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

searxng? Anyone?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Uses Bing results.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

So that's why it's so good at finding porn.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (9 replies)

[+] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

  <form method="GET" action="https://duckduckgo.com/">
    <input name="q" type="text"/>
    <button type="submit">Go</button>
  </form>

This is a fully functional search bar. This is all it needs to be. It doesn't need Javascript, only if you want suggestions.

The last time I checked, Google still works if you simply pass your query in the URL using the q variable. Google has no need to enforce Javascript.

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] zer0bitz@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Just use SearXNG.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I like the SearX search engine. It gives old-school, relevant search results, not google ranked ones.

https://search.inetol.net/

It's also spread out over many separate instances, so you can pick the one that best suits your search needs:

https://searx.space/

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] unrushed233@lemmings.world 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Use LibreX or a fork called LibreY, it's a JS-free proxy for Google search

There's a list of instances at https://librey.org/instances.php

Something similar exists for DuckDuckGo btw, it's called 4get

Or you can just use SearXNG, a meta search engine that aggregates results from multiple sources

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

No offense intended, but why are you still using Google? Startpage has anonyomized results from Google. DuckDuckGo is good enough for most people as well. Brave search also exists if you don't mind supporting that shitty company.

[+] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] m_f@midwest.social 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

A lot of the web is powered by JS, but much less of it needs to be. Here's a couple of sites that are part of a trend to not unnecessarily introduce it:

http://youmightnotneedjs.com/

https://htmx.org/

The negative implications for Google requiring JS is that they will use it to track everything possible about you that they can, even down to how you move your cursor, or how much battery you have left on your phone in order to jack up prices, or any other number of shitty things.

[–] Chingzilla@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Htmx does use javascript under the hood, but just makes it so the developer can use html markdown for more a more interactive environment that's driven sever side. So the initial page load should render, but UI elements might not work as intended.

htmx is more a move back to REST as it was originally defined (aka not json backend).

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

lol. nope. not happening. that's not how to get me to even think about using your search again (having quit over a decade ago).

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago

I've been happy with Qwant lately, they have their own index so using them doesn't support the Google + Bing hegemony. They're also EU based and regulated by the gdpr.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

why are you using google in 2024 grandpa

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago

There are so many alternatives

[–] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago (5 children)

AFAIK Startpage gives you google results with your privacy intact and less ads.

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments