possiblylinux127

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 25 minutes ago

It is encrypted

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 26 minutes ago

Until your house burns down

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 27 minutes ago

Modern Windows (and Linux) is very hard to kill. You can unplug it all day without issue. Registry corruption and similar issues have not been an issue in decades.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

Get a SSD. It will run so much faster and everything will be instant.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 29 minutes ago

Swap the drive and do a fresh install. It will run like new.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 30 minutes ago

Wipe your device and do a fresh install from scratch via USB. It will run like new.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 31 minutes ago

What ram do you have?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 31 minutes ago

I do that as well

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 32 minutes ago

You act as though you somehow have more knowledge than everyone else. They problem is that you don't understand encryption and permissions. You can't just magically make something unreadable by programs with the same permission level. If you encrypt it there will need to be a key to decrypt it. That can could conceivably be encrypted with a password but that would require someone to enter a password. If they don't enter a password they key will be stored plain text so anyone could easily decrypt your messages. Programs running as a user have the same permissions as that user. Does that make sense? You can't just make something selectively unreadable with the current security model. I guess you could try to implement some sort or privileged daemon but that would open up more issues than it solved.

I would have a problem if Signal claimed that the desktop messages were encrypted at rest. However, they don't make any such claim. If you are concerned about security I would recommend running everything in virtual machines and flatpaks. This way the chances of something misbehaving in a way that causes harm is minimized.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 41 minutes ago

It is cheaper because you are the product. Maybe find something used.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

And also Chinese

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 hours ago

You shouldn't use Android then. It is way worse

 
 

They pulled an Apple as Nextcloud can sometimes implode

 

So many people here will go though great lengths to protect themselves from fingerprinting and snooping. However, one thing tends to get overlooked is DHCP and other layer 3 holes. When your device requests an IP it sends over a significant amount of data. DHCP fingerprinting is very similar to browser fingerprinting but unlike the browser there does not seem to be a lot of resources to defend against it. You would need to make changes to the underlying OS components to spoof it.

What are everyone's thoughts on this? Did we miss the obvious?

https://www.arubanetworks.com/vrd/AOSDHCPFPAppNote/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm#href=Chap2.html&single=true

 
 

Help I now have several lans

 

Think about it. The more you learned about your brain the more complex it would become. Also I'm not sure we have enough capacity to reflect on ourselves by processing everything. Think about the massive complexity of every connection. Could someone actually process that or are we limited by ourselves?

 
 
 

Its been around for millions of years but because it is slow it doesn't ever get press coverage

view more: next ›