this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
23 points (100.0% liked)

196

16542 readers
2055 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] joeyv120@ttrpg.network 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The Israeli government is murdering children and committing war crimes, and they're upset about what The Onion has to say about it.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They are targeting the press, they really care about public opinion

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They're also full on slaughtering the press too.

So a rundown of what they're doing

  1. Killing 2 civilians for every 1 Hamas
  2. Killing children (50% of Gaza is under 18)
  3. Killing journalists

They're 100% correct Hamas needs to be wiped out because Hamas wants Jews to not exist, but goddamn the ends to not justify the means.

They've lost the fucking plot.

Mark my words anti-Semitism is going to continue it's crescendo and it's 100% because of the IDF and that asshat running Israel.

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Hamas charter excerpt.
16. Hamas affirms that its conflict is with the Zionist project not with the Jews because of their religion. Hamas does not wage a struggle against the Jews because they are Jewish but wages a struggle against the Zionists who occupy Palestine. Yet, it is the Zionists who constantly identify Judaism and the Jews with their own colonial project and illegal entity.

[–] GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Good to know they uphold this text by not publicly murdering and raping random civilians in their homes and proudly sharing the video.

[–] Baahb@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago

The IDF also says it's not genociding. Military groups are known for their trustworthiness

[–] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Does that mean Israel needs to be wiped out because they don't want Palestinians to exist?

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The ironic thing is, conflating any and all criticism of the state of Israel with anti-semitism could be argued as anti-semitic itself, because to suggest that jewish people in general and the Israeli state/military are one in the same such that criticism of the later is also hateful towards the former, is also to suggest that jewish people as a whole are responsible for the actions of Israel.

As cultural groups as a whole are inherently unable to be guilty of crimes (since even if a large number of people belonging to one commit some crime, such a group will also contain members that cannot be guilty of it, like young children), but states and similar entities, being organized and capable of decision-making, can be, then any attempt to link the moral culpability of a state and that of a cultural group is inherently to apply unfair accusations to that group, and thus hateful to it.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I’m going to start doing this now lol

Edit: pointing it out**

[–] gerowen@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think a big part of it, here in the US, is besides all the post WW2 sentiment, a lot of folks here in the bible belt literally think they are God's chosen people, and so whatever they do is right by God, no matter how terrible. I recently showed up for jury duty and was speaking to a lady there about her son who had joined the Marine Corps. and thought he might get deployed, and she said, I shit you not, "At least he'll be fighting for God's people".

I've seen antisemitism. I've been in online communities that slowly devolved into rat caricatures and conspiracy theories about how Jews are out to destroy the world. So I know that modern antisemitism persists and is a thing to watch out for. But it's not antisemitic to admit that Zionist Israel is butchering innocent people because they want to claim all of Palestine for themselves, and that the west is too weak willed to do anything about it for fear of being called antisemitic, or going against "God's chosen people". That's not antisemitism, it's an objective, observable fact.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The even bigger issue is the Bible Belt is those moron’s reading of Revelation, which has them thinking Israel has to control Jerusalem for the rapture to happen.

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That’s actually a requirement?

Do they have to hold up the Holy Grail and yell out “Jewmanji”, too?

[–] Vytle@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Bro can i just say that i fucking hate that anti-semetic is even an argument used when someone demonstrates support for Hamas? it doesnt even make sense because by definition both parties are semetic.

[–] SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I think there is a very good argument of antisemitism if you support Hamas. There is no argument for antisemitism if you support Palestinians.

[–] Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Who the fuck supports Hamas? It's an actual terrorist organization that's oppressing people in Palestine

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Every source I find suggests that Hamas has significant support from the people of Palestine

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Damn I wonder why the people being subjected to genocide support the group fighting the genociders?

I just can’t work it out.

[–] Custodian1623@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Colloquially yeah it makes a lot of sense to say Hamas is antisemitic, the word means hatred for Jews regardless of the etymology of 'semite'. Take it up with marriam-webster, not the people correctly using the modern definition of the word

[–] misophist@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

it doesnt even make sense because by definition both parties are semetic.

Oof, either you're just grossly misinformed and performing a cringey "ackchually", or you're anti-semitic yourself and perpetuating anti-semitic rhetoric.

While yes, both are Semitic people, the term 'anti-semitic' was specifically coined by Nazi Germany to make their genocide seem like it had a basis in science. They specifically used it to refer to Jews. Nobody uses "anti-semitic" to mean all semites except hate groups and holocaust deniers who are trying to say "see, it doesn't even mean Jews specifically! Jews are just playing the victim!"

I will assume you're simply ignorant or misinformed, but feel free to correct me if this was actually an intentional dog-whistle.

[–] Lupus108@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

it doesnt even make sense because by definition both parties are semetic

No, the term was conceived to describe the hate against Jews, semantically you are correct concerning the term semites, but antisemitism explicitly means Jewish people.

Due to the root word Semite, the term is prone to being invoked as a misnomer by those who interpret it as referring to racist hatred directed at all "Semitic people" (i.e., those who speak Semitic languages, such as Arabs, Assyrians, and Arameans). This usage is erroneous; the compound word antisemitismus (lit. 'antisemitism') was first used in print in Germany in 1879[17] as a "scientific-sounding term" for Judenhass (lit. 'Jew-hatred'),[18][19][20][21][22] and it has since been used to refer to anti-Jewish sentiment alone.[18][23][24]

Interestingly antisemites themselves coined that term, it's not in the wiki quote but further in the article it goes into detail regarding that.

[–] PanArab@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Golda Meir once said "After the Holocaust, Jews are free to do whatever they want".

Since then, Palestinians have been paying for the crimes of Nazi Germany.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Best take on this. A lot of Jewish people said “we must never let this happen again,” but some motherfuckers took notes.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Everyone post-WW2: "Never again"

  • Some people: "Never again should that be inflicted on anyone"
  • Other people: "Never again should that be inflicted on the Jewish"
[–] root_beer@midwest.social 1 points 10 months ago

There’s a YouTube channel covering WWII week by week, and there’s a sister series called War Against Humanity, which covers the atrocities committed on all sides—not just the a death camps and the murders in the ghettos, but firebombing campaigns, the Japanese internment camps, the Bata’an death march, the famine in India at the hands of the Raj, and so on. Every episode ends with host Spartacus Olsson repeating the phase that we should be using, “Never forget”. Because a huge contingent of us seems to be forgetting.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

if anything, it was probably a death threat.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Should've snitched on himself for the prize

[–] crsu@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

The genocide will continue until morale improves

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago

DARVO

The battle cry of abusive assholes, worldwide!