this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
272 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18992 readers
2531 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 114 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Trump has offered praise for West, calling him “one of my favorite candidates.” Another is Green Party candidate Jill Stein. Trump favors both for the same reason. “I like her very much. You know why? She takes 100% from them. He takes 100%.”

waiting until the usual lemmy suspects show up to be like "iM vOtInG tHiRd PaRtY tHeY aReNt SpOiLeR cAnDiDaTes" my guy the republicans have literally said out loud that they are supporting these spoiler candidates as spoilers, if you're voting for them, you are voting for trump.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago

"I'm a very lefty leftist, I hate fascism, that's why this election season I am voting exactly the way the furthest right party wants me to."

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure we can convince a significant portion of the MAGA crowd to vote third party, by informing them it's impossible for Trump to win without a large turnout for third parties. 🤔

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Brilliant!!!

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

i would like a refund on my timeline

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This article is full of gems, this is one of my favorites.

The next day, with the deadline to qualify for the Arizona ballot just hours away, Brett Johnson, a prominent Republican lawyer, and Amanda Reeve, a former GOP state lawmaker, made house visits to each as they tried to persuade both to sign new paperwork to serve as West electors.

Johnson and Reeve work for Snell & Wilmer, which has done $257,000 worth of business for the Republican National Committee over the past two years, campaign finance disclosures show.

Hamrick declined to comment on the role of Johnson and Reeve. They did not respond to requests for comment.

Edited with 'helpful tip' from @odelik@lemmy.today

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Helpful tip:

For quotes you can use the following formatting:

> "The next day, with the deadline to qualify for the Arizona ballot just hours away, Brett Johnson, a prominent Republican lawyer, and Amanda Reeve, a former GOP... 
> [blank lines] 
> Again after a blank line/new paragraph. 

Which would produce

The next day, with the deadline to qualify for the Arizona ballot just hours away, Brett Johnson, a prominent Republican lawyer, and Amanda Reeve, a former GOP state lawmaker, made house visits to each as they tried to persuade both to sign new paperwork to serve as West electors.

Johnson and Reeve work for Snell & Wilmer, which has [...]

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

More helpful tips:

If you just double space at the end of a line, then press enter, Lemmy (which uses a form of Markdown) will treat it as a new line.
Like this.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (38 children)

Republicans know they cannot go above 46-47% in popular vote, and cannot win what is essentially a two-person race with that support. A Republican nominee has received above 48% only once after 1988 (GW Bush in 2004). Only way to win the EC without PV win is for third party candidates to get support in key battleground states like Nader in 2000 and Johnson-Stein in 2016.

load more comments (38 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm sure Russia is, too. At this point, is there any difference between what the cons want and what Putin wants?

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Trump's 1st impeachment seems so quaint and distant. Its been a wild few years.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why are we not running RINO's all over the place? Fuck these backwater toothless bigots. They need to be fucking dealt with.

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

MAGA types are the 'fall in line' type, so it's really hard to run candidates that appeal to them. Their Preacher and AM Shock Jock tells them 'vote for the Republican or the Devil wins and America dies' and they don't entertain anyone but the Republicans. It'd be wasted resources. It's far more effective to appeal to moderates, because the GOP has basically forsaken that entire group of voters to entertain their MAGA base, and we have over 200 Republicans on our side saying "we don't agree with the Dems on policy, but we're still voting for them because we aren't MAGAts." That's a more effective strategy, IMO, than trying to prop up Libertarians or Constitutionalists.

The way to deal with the 'backwater toothless bigots' is to turn out for November. Get your vote locked in, then do your damndest to get as many Left-Wingers to the polls as possible. I don't care where you are. Turn out and vote. That's how we fucking deal with them.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Because it costs money. It’s hard enough getting liberals to vote for one candidate, libs have an habit of seeing the flaws in the system and will vote Green Party or whatever as a protest vote, and these days it’s the candidate with the most money winning. So when you prop up a sabotage candidate you’re taking away from the candidate you actually need to win. Plus, Dems just kinda don’t like playing dirty like that.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Yet another thing they learned from Fidesz. I wonder if Project 2025 will also include total control of almost all media outlets, with some independents being left, solely to show the EU we still have independent media and use as an argument.

load more comments
view more: next ›