this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
15 points (100.0% liked)

Steam

10163 readers
1 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Gabe is helping, sure, but he isn't holding up gaming. People were gaming on Linux before Proton even existed, myself included. Also, even if Valve went away completely, Proton is open-source and there are people like GloriousEggroll who work on Proton entirely as a community member. Proton will live on, specifically because it is open-source. All the progress made on Proton won't suddenly disappear, all the games that were previously playable on Proton will still be playable on Proton.

It's a somewhat reasonable fear but it's not a realistic fear. Proton isn't going anywhere.

[–] RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

Additionally, if Steam would start to morph into what is posted here, it would simply be integrated into Heroic and / or lutris just as Epic is right now. There would be no need to actually launch steam anymore but just use it as a background service to pipe your games into something else.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Proton will live on, specifically because it is open-source.

Don't just thank open source; thank copyleft for the fact that Valve couldn't make a closed-source fork of it even if it wanted to.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Proton is open source. Anyone can pull it together and integrate it. Gog have been doing DRM free games for a while, they'll be quite keen to fill this niche. Epic probably won't care. If none do, someone will want to.

[–] brrt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What are you smoking? GOG Galaxy doesn’t even have a Linux client. In fact it has been one of the most requested features for years and nothing has happened.

Edit: it’s also the reason I stopped buying from them when I got my Steam Deck.

[–] puchaczyk@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Valve is a private company whereas GOG belongs to CDProject - a publicly traded company. GOG might want to fill the void but they're more likely to do dumb, shortsighted decisions in contrast to Valve.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Maybe, but DRM free content isn't exactly shareholder value...

It's better shepherded than Epic. They probably don't fill the space because Steam do it better, but you invest more if the return is higher.

The case I'm referring to is in the future if Steam badly enshittified.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Gog have been doing DRM free games for a while

As far as I know GOG also sells drm content and Steam also sells drm-free content. So what's the point

they'll be quite keen to fill this niche

I also don't remember them doing anything for Linux apart from releasing a broken port then badmouthing people who complained that the game they bought is broken.

[–] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Isint Steam a form of DRM? You effectively cant play your games if you dont have an account I thought

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Obviously his death will trigger a worldwide AR Easter egg hunt, where the Steam user worthy enough to find the three keys first will become the new Gaben and Master Of Steam.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] HaiZhung@feddit.de 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

What many posters in this thread fail to realize is that there is a very good reason why steam hasn’t been hit by the enshittification that otherwise permeates human existence in 2024.

Of course, Gaben as their CEO has the last say in it. And he’s just a good guy. But wait, aren’t there other companies that have good guys as their CEO and yet the enshittification persists?

The profound reason is that Valve is not a publicly traded company. They have no obligation to any investors to make number go up. They are a private company, they can do whatever the fuck they want. If they stay flat and keep paying their employees, that’s totally fine, and there is 0 pressure on them to change anything. THAT‘s why Valve seems like such a different company compared to everything else that’s out there.

Of course it’s still a choice to go public or not, and they have made the right call (for us consumers).

[–] GhostTheToast@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Based take imo. I think many posters fail realize the insane amount of money steam makes Valve. Rough estimates are that Steam sold 400 million games last year. Average cost for a game is ~$15.5. Steam has a platform fee of 30%. That means that, roughly, Steam made Valve ~1.86 billion dollars just through the sell of games. Not considering microtransactions or hardware sells. Reportedly, Valve made 1 billion dollars just off cases from CS2 crate openings. Let's just give Valve the benefit of the doubt and assume they made $5 billion dollars last year.

Impressive, but honestly not that impressive when you consider that Xbox brought in 18 billion and PlayStation brought in 30 billion last year. However, if you factor in that Xbox has a head count of ~$20,100 and Sony has one of ~12,700. While Valve has a head count of about ~400. We see that Xbox and Sony are bringing in about $900K and $2.4M per head respectively. Valve is bring in 12.5M per head. Plus Xbox and PlayStation have multiple studios and campuses. While I believe Valve only has the 1 or 2 campuses and they are their only studio.

My point being that, Valve has a ton of liquid cash for investment and growth opportunities. I'd wager Valve brought in more than 5 Billion last year, but with them being a private company, it's hard to pin down what exactly they could've made.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

there is a very good reason why steam hasn’t been hit by the enshittification that otherwise permeates human existence in 2024.

Come again? Steam is enshitifed af. from forcing CS:GO players to move to CS:2 to adding DRM left and right, they do it all. They even release remasters of old games that are essentially always broken one or another.

[–] rickdg@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Valve is a whole company of people like Gaben.

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Valve is a unique company with no traditional hierarchy. In business school, I read a very interesting Harvard Business Review article on the subject. Unfortunately it’s locked behind a paywall, but this is Google AI’s summary of the article which I confirm to be true from what I remember:

According to a Harvard Business Review article from 2013, Valve, the gaming company that created Half Life and Portal, has a unique organizational structure that includes a flat management system called "Flatland". This structure eliminates traditional hierarchies and bosses, allowing employees to choose their own projects and have autonomy. Other features of Valve's structure include: 

  • Self-allocated time: Employees have complete control over how they allocate their time 
  • No managers: There is no managerial oversight 
  • Fluid structure: Desks have wheels so employees can easily move between teams, or "cabals" 
  • Peer-based performance reviews: Employees evaluate each other's performance and stack rank them 
  • Hiring: Valve has a unique hiring process that supports recruiting people with a variety of skills
[–] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Kinda sounds like how worker cooperatives work tbh, but with Gabe still technically being the owner.

I remember reading a news piece a while back about how the founder of a food company made sure to transfer ownership to the employees before leaving. While we're talking about worst-case scenarios, let's also hope for the best and hope that Gabe has a similar plan.

[–] andxz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Him being a pretty smart guy overall surely has at least some sort of continuity planned.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

PeopleMakeGames has a two part series on Valve that's pretty interesting. The second part (here) dives into the structure of the company. It does have a bit of an angle, fwiw, so if you'd prefer something more objective, it might not be a great watch. Personally I think the issues they bring up are valid, but figured I'd mention it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Templa@beehaw.org 1 points 4 months ago

The fact that people non ironically visit 4chan in 2024 kind of worries me

[–] Hazzard@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

For sure, valid to fear the enshittification of steam. But they aren't killing proton. Maybe ignoring proton at worst. But Steam has profit motivations for not being reliant on Windows, which has actively been trying to supplant them with the Windows Store for years.

As another separate, profit-motivated company, with a gaming division and a lot to gain from eating Steam's lunch, Microsoft is not Steam's friend. Proton is a critical bargaining tool for them, and not having to include windows licenses for devices like the Steam Deck helps their costs too.

[–] Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Anyone who thinks their steam libraries will be safe forever is delusional.

Eventually a for-profit motivated individual will gain control and they will use all their MBA learnings to maximize subscriptions, per play revenue, per download revenue and overall provide a cheaper platform.

There isn't an mba on the planet that doesn't recognize that advertising is highly lucrative and being the company that sells the most pc games means you have metrics no one else has. They'll instantly monetize advertising and the popups we get when we log in today will turn into mandatory non-skippable ads on the free tier to start a game, and they'll add their wrapper on top of games in their store, especially games that do not currently need steam to play today.

It'll only get way worse. Expect everything to be pay to play.. once gaben is gone. They have a monopoly and any leader would think they are too big to fail. No one can just take their games elsewhere... we're locked in. We're committed. We can't escape. They've got us by the balls.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

GOG.
We need to support GOG and it's model as much as possible.

<3

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago (6 children)

If only they would support Linux more.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 1 points 4 months ago

The ship has sailed about 4 times now, gog galaxy on Linux has constantly been at the top of requests but we made a stinky about the Witcher 2 so gog and epic will forever hold the community as not worth it. Now the community has done the leg work they have no reason to mess about with translating all those .net calls

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sproid@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

That post is pure hysteria. First no one knows when Gabe is going to die, and even if he live very long he may step down due to old age still.

  • also worrying so much about something that may happen 14 years later according to op is unnecessary and distorted thinking.
  • why assume there is going to be a power vacuum? can't he and his leadership make pans of succession?
  • then believing a whole made-up story going down the rabbit hole of the worst case scenario is again unnecessary and distorted thinking. Is okay to think of worst case scenarios but to take them as if they were real is gifting ourselves anxiety for free.
  • in any case, the mental exercise of thinking of some undesirable possibilities allow us to take precautions and prepare to the extend that is appropriate and reachable. Which would be the most efficient behavior that thwarts "actual fear" as OP writes it.
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

Considering how much money they make with gambling, I think Valve is not as saint-like as people think it is.

People make Games has done two great videos on Valve

[–] MoonMoon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Deep discounts are locked behind a subscription

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I already have enough games to last a lifetime, stored to my storage

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

PC gaming is not here to stay. One day, someone, will finally do a cloud /saas streaming solution which works, which solves the latency and fidelity issues and which will be accepted and trusted by the masses.

Hopefully that will be a Valve solution. Not Nvidia, MS, Google or Sony.

From that moment on the client will not matter anymore and you will just stream it to your device and from there cast it to your big screen.

Hopefully I'm full of shit and this will never happen. But I'm afraid I'm not.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The direct transfer of power in tech is often to someone that will carry the torch. It's quite rare that a successor is picked that has been at the company for years, but wants to change practically everything about it. For that reason, I can see Gabe passing to a like-minded person that already knows that they are a succession candidate.

But ultimately none of us know Gabe, or what he plans to do. He may have a 100 step plan to secede power, or he might get to 65, say "that'll do" and just sell up and retire to a remote island somewhere. The plans might have been in place for years, or he might not want to consider Valve without him. Hell, he might not even think that Valve should exist without him. It's impossible to guess, so it's not worth worrying about...

[–] Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Remember when google didn't do evil? Remember when they were hip, cool and not the living nightmare of a corporation we see of them today?

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That was two CEO's in. Google under Sundar is very different to Google under Page.

[–] elauso@feddit.de 0 points 4 months ago

So this really doesn't alleviate any concerns for Steam. They too might be just 2 CEO changes away from sending their users to hell.

[–] 3volver@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Gaben's last dying wish is to make every game work on Linux and donates $1 billion to making it happen.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So Gaben actually IS a dragon.

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 0 points 4 months ago

I was thinking about Dunkelzahn and his testament.

[–] thawed_caveman@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The life expectancy of 75 is an average (of the US population i assume), billionaires are likely to live longer

[–] theonyltruemupf@feddit.de 0 points 4 months ago

75 years of nation-wide life expectancy is also likely to include early deaths due to accidents, cancer and such. People who die of "old age" typically do later than 75.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I think this post massively overestimates the power a CEO has. The CEO is beholden to the shareholders. Valve is private, ~~so~~ and its shareholders are its workers. It would be useful to know how many shares Gaben has of valve, but I still don't think the next CEO would suddenly also be the majority owner.

Also, I know things have changed a lot in the last 12 years, but 12 years ago regarding the total dissolution of Valve, Gaben said:

“It’s way more likely we would head in that direction than say, ‘Let’s find some giant company that wants to cash us out and wait two or three years to have our employment agreements terminate."

Also, forcing users onto windows is THE way to kill valve's profits. The whole point of the Linux push was a direct response to the windows store, and msft's threat of forcing valve to give them a cut of purchase through steam. Msft will still do that the first chance it gets. So even the most profit-minded new leader wouldn't make that choice, as it's plainly shortsighted.

[–] Sianna@feddit.de 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Employees are stakeholder, not necessarily shareholder. Management, likely. The grunts, I think not so much.

load more comments
view more: next ›