this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
401 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4563 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meanwhile, Harris has aggresively hit the campaign trail, hoping to fire up voters in battleground states across the country

On Thursday, former president Donald Trump attempted to — yet again — recalibrate his campaign, this time with a press conference at his property in Bedminster, New Jersey.

The appearance at his beloved golf course comes exactly one week after Trump tried to put the spotlight back on himself amid Vice President Kamala Harris’s surging poll numbers, with a press conference at his Florida home of Mar-a-Lago. He used the event to grumble over crowd sizes, at one point stating incorrectly that his speech before the January 6 riot at the Capitol had more attendees than Martin Luther King’s 1963 March on Washington.

It’s noteworthy that both of these “press conferences” happened at his own properties — the safest of spaces for the former president.

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 76 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

He also complained about Obama golfing (at Air Force bases close to the White House). Trump nearly doubled his count (mostly at private/expensive golf courses).

Republicans are nothing if not hypocrites.

[–] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 60 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Mostly at his own private + expensive golf courses, where he was billing the secret service at exorbitant rates, which we all paid for in our taxes. That’s fucking bullshit, and reason #27564 that you shouldn’t vote for the guy.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

He was directly profiting from his golf outings at our expense. Fuuuuck this guy.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Had it been a peanut farm I'm sure Republicans would have been going apeshit, right!

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Dude just owned a peanut farm, right? It’s not like he forced tax payers to pay him for his own usage of that peanut farm.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

That's the worst part

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Fuuuuuuuuuuck this guy!!!!!

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Bold "our" in "our taxes" as well, since he certainly did not pay any of his. To the extent of committing crimes to not pay.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Obama golfing (at Air Force bases close to the White House).

Golf courses specifically designed and built for heads of state and dignitaries to golf at because of house safe and secure they are. Mar-a-lago was allegedly a nightmare for the secret service to secure.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 50 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

i think hes terrified of the optics of not drawing crowds. the 24-person couchfucker event prolly scared the shit out of him

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Was that a thing or are you referencing the picture that was taken 1.5 hours before the event began?

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yikes. People like to believe whatever fits their narrative. Really sad to see that. I hate Trump more than anyone, but fake stories are really not going to help.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

What 24-person event?

Edit: oh, I guess this.

Politifact says it's false.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

People are saying it was a weak and low energy crowd of 24. Repubs have been telling me for years to use the "people are saying" standard for fact checking.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Good point.

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I agree. And I think that assassination attempt has him scared, whether he admits it or not.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

If he's so terrified, just ensure everyone there has a gun. I'm sure there's plenty of good people with guns to stop the bad ones.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

You do not need to agree, what he says is based on a fake story.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I was reading an article the other day (will try to find it) that said Trump almost 100% has PTSD after the assassination attempt. According to someone with the campaign, every night he's just been watching and rewatching that ~10 second clip showing how close he was being killed. His speeches have gotten a lot darker in tone (even compared to how he's always been) and as this post says, he's not really been "out" since then.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it's more likely that he's reliving a moment where all attention was on him.

[–] Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 weeks ago

I saw this take in that thread too, and I have to say it seems to be the more plausible of the two. Someone told him that he was basically guaranteed the presidency in that moment, and now it's all slipping away from him. He's trying to go back to the moment where he was sure he'd won.

Of course, it could also be trauma. Who can say? If he even knows for sure (and I personally doubt if he has that level of self awareness), he'll take it to his grave.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

that said Trump almost 100% has PTSD

Send him to the VA to deal with his PTSD, see the real life nightmare all his budget cuts and slashes and how it impacts veterans the repubs claim to love.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Would love to, but captain bone spurs never served

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The VA can barely help veterans, you think they'll even see a dodger?

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I was reading an article the other day (will try to find it)

If you do find it, you should share it at /c/politics and/or /c/news. It sounds interesting. I will try to remember to look back here but to be honest my memory sucks.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks - I was hoping for something more in depth, but this certainly could be it…:

According to Vanity Fair's sources, another theory floating among Trump's circle is that he is suffering from the trauma of the assassination attempt against him in July.

“He’s been watching that seven-second clip of how close he was to getting shot right in the head—over and over and over again,” said a Republican close to the campaign. “He may actually legit have PTSD.” A campaign official confirmed that it continues to affect Trump. “He’s been through a lot,” he said.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This isn't the exact article I read but it's pretty much the same thing.

Trump watches himself get shot ‘over and over’ and campaign staff fear he has PTSD: report | MSN link

Here's the quote I was referencing:

“He’s been watching that seven-second clip of how close he was to getting shot right in the head—over and over and over again,” the Republican close to the campaign told Vanity Fair. “He may actually legit have PTSD.”

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago

That was shared yesterday

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Maybe getting shot at made him realize he's not as liked as he thought he was, especially considering it was one of his team that shot at him.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 14 points 3 weeks ago

Looks like the doctor is afraid of the monster he made.

What a coward.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 6 points 3 weeks ago
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

“Old man yells at crowd”

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Old man suffering from dementia and too frightened to go outside. He's always been too frightened to actually answer any questions from the press. Just flees home and puts on a lid.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Was that when biden had covid??? He gets you isolate for other people right? right??

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

This is subjective, of course, but I recall Trumpanzees saying "time for a lid" (about Biden, with no sense of irony that Donald literally fled from reporters when the questions hurt his feelings) throughout the entire 2020 election. I don't think it was specific to having covid.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean, he almost got killed. I'd be a bit wary too

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

yes but you're normal. We're talking about a demented sociopathic malignant narcissist who also happens to be a convicted fraud and rapist in a wig, makeup, and heels.

Not . . . not that there's anything wrong with a wig, makeup, and heels - only if you're pretending to be a dictatorial strongman asshole.

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's like Vance's eyeliner: Makeup for men should be perfectly acceptable, if it helps them feel more comfortable. But when your base regularly hurls f-slurs, it's just hypocritical.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

constantly injects violent rhetoric into political discourse

Wait, no, not like that.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That the Iranians want to kill him might have something to do with his choice of venue.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Did they release a statement or something? Or is that like an extrapolation they've made from the 'hacking by Iran' thing?