this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
325 points (96.6% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 208 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Number 1

Nowhere in the constitution does it limit the amount of SC justices. We can have 9 or 9000 if we really want.

Number 2

DC and Puerto Rico should have been states decades ago. Guam, too.

Number 3

The policies of Harris/Walz are what 70+% of the country wants. If they are far left, then I am the Queen of England

Number 4

Tell snaggletooth to shut the fuck up and die already. This fucking lich has been the root cause of the court needing to be fixed

#VOTE!

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"By the way, on packing the Supreme Court ... you may know this already. It's unconstitutional."

It's not unconstitutional if you fucking pack the court with people who aren't fucking traitorous fascists. What are ya gonna do? Sue all the way to the supreme court???

Fuck that weird old strokey bastard. You know what you do when you lose fuck face? Get good or go home.

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago

It's good to know he's worried about it, means it'll probably work

[–] frezik@midwest.social 22 points 1 month ago

He knows how this works. McConnell spent decades setting up the current Supreme Court to be the monster that it is, and he doesn't want that work undone in a single Presidential Administration.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The segment of the constitution relating to the supreme court is preposterously small. It's very weird that people think that no one is capable of actually reading the damned thing.

Never mentions any number of judges. Mentions numbers in a bunch of other places, and gets so detailed as to specify how to break up the initial batch of senators to ensure rolling terms.

But no, they specifically intended for there to be a specific number of justices that they just opted not to write down: ~~6~~ ~~5~~ ~~6~~ ~~7~~ ~~9~~ ~~10~~ ~~7~~ 9 justices, just like the constitution forgot to dictate.

Other fun fact: you can pass a law that says the supreme court can't hear appeals to certain types of cases. It's explicitly stated that you could just write the supreme court out of hearing any case that involved the supreme court or any Justice, an executive who appointed any member of said court, or just about anything.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Don't forget Samoa and the other island terrories. It's a bit of a tricky situation because of population size and such but there shouldn't be a single person on American territory without voting Congressional representation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

This fucking lich has been the root cause of the court needing to be fixed

Pretty sure the Lich is literally based on him. If I was coming up with a tabletop and wanted an "undead asshole, lord of assholes" I would certainly use his likeness.

His history is fucking wild. He graduated top of his classes and graduated college with a PoliSci, then went on to join MLKs March and speech "I have a dream" in person. Then he was appointed party whip by Frist. That time as whip is probably why he's such a hard-line ass-bag of bones now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 77 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

During his speech, Spectrum reports that McConnell called the Walz-Harris ticket “the far left of the Democratic Party.”

“And by the way, that’s most Democrats today,” McConnell said, according to Spectrum.

Oh, no! Harris and Walz are representing the will of the majority of the people! Whatever the fuck is to be done about democracy?!

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's also not possible for most democrats to be on the far left of their party (unless the remaining minority are on average even further to the right of their party). If everyone's further left than you're expecting, that's just the party's new average center position.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

Majority of Americans: Support policies X, Y, and Z.

Democrats: Put policies X, Y, and Z into their platform.

Republicans: Extreme socialist Demoncrabs want to destroy America!!!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Literally every dem presidential candidate is the Most Furthest Leftistest candidate in history.

Biden was the most leftist politician ever the year he beat Sanders. Clinton was an extremists Marxist in 2016. Obama was literally Stalin in 2008. John Kerry was going to be to the left of the Vietcong in 2004. Al Gore was a Manchurian deep state CCP asset in 2000. Etc, etc.

So of course we just now discover the ultra-left agenda of a California AG and her friend the Minnesota hog father two months before the general election. Shame McConnell didn't think to warn us sooner.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 76 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Is this guy delusional? After the way his party treated him in the convention, he still doubles down that the problem is the democrats?

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Can't stop felating trump ya know.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] frigidaphelion@lemmy.world 66 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Please just die already you turtlefaced googly eyed fuck

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Fun fact, Congress can change the size of the Supreme Court at will for any reason.

They SHRUNK the court in 1866 from 9 to 7 because they just fucking hated Andrew Johnson THAT MUCH and they wanted to deny him a nomination.

After Johnson was out, they raised it back up to 9 in 1869, Granting 2, and it stayed that way ever since.

https://www.history.com/news/supreme-court-justices-number-constitution

"The Supreme Court had just ruled that paper money was unconstitutional, which would have 'wreaked havoc' with the U.S. Treasury, says Marcus. But Grant and Congress quickly confirmed two new justices who reversed the Court’s decision in the earlier case, saving the Republicans from having to undo the nation’s entire system of legal tender."

[–] Hazzia@infosec.pub 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The Supreme Court had just ruled that paper money was unconstitutional

Jesus and I thought our court was making the most dumbass decisions. Wierdly gives me hope that the Harris administration can fix a whole bumcha bullshit though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They also shrank the court to 8 in 2016.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (6 children)

what an assholish shitstain.

he's totally okay with handing fascists over as long as those fascists "promise" to give him a seat at the table when they take over the country

and you know what they say about people who sit at the table of fascists? (they're also fascists)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I see the man behind "making election day a national holiday is a power grab by the democrats"^[1] is rolling out some new hits. Never ceases to amaze that he can get away with saying this stuff out loud.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Well, of course. Consider your own reference. Mitch knows they are wildly unpopular, and making it easier for the common folk they've been fucking over for years to vote would be disastrous for them.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 35 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

So he doesn't want DC or PR statehood, giving federal representation to millions of otherwise disenfranchised US citizens because...he thinks they'll elect Democrats. Cool.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 32 points 1 month ago

GOD if only they were RIGHT about how "dangerous" democrats were. IF ONLY THE DEMOCRATS WEREN'T COWARDS and would actually do this shit

[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

By the way, on packing the Supreme Court ... you may know this already. It's unconstitutional.

The only things the constitution has to say on the matter of the supreme court are: there has to be one, the supreme court judges should be paid, and the president can appoint supreme court justices with the advice and consent of the senate. It is completely silent on matters of how many supreme court justices there should be, or how long their terms should be.

For all his many, many faults, Mitch McConnell is not a profoundly stupid man, so I'm sure he knows this. Since he very likely knows this already, he probably has a reason for lying to the public on the matter. If the president does appoint several more justices, it's not like the Republicans can sue: no lower court would take the case, and the supreme court would already be packed with people who will actually be faithful to the constitution. So legal threats are a complete non-starter. That just leaves non-legal threats, which is what I think this is. I think Glitch is previewing the Republican strategy in the case of Harris getting more justices hired, which is they'll stoke up the fear and hatred of their idiotic, mouth breathing supporters. It's a thinly-veiled threat of treason.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 29 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

This from Mr "elections have consequences" himself.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 10 points 4 weeks ago

I mean, this isn't hypocrisy, he's acknowledging that there will be consequences for the GOP.

All I can say is that I hope that the consequences destroy the GOP.

[–] Carrick1973@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Isn't this fucker dead yet? I have a bottle of scotch waiting for this asshole's demise. Same as Betsy DeVoss and her shitty brother; and the final Koch brother...

[–] noride@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

Nah, he'll never die. You can't kill a flesh-golem directly, you have to find its master and break the summon.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cheeseburger@lemmy.ca 28 points 4 weeks ago

McConnell called the Walz-Harris ticket “the far left of the Democratic Party.”

😆😆😆

[–] Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca 28 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

This motherfucker is actually older than a Galapagos tortoise. Also, when did they unpause him? I thought his OS froze and he was shuffled off to hospice.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“Oh, no! I could be held accountable for my unfathomable corruption!”

[ geriatric tortoise noises ]

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

whatever their 'worst nightmares' are, are more than likely just what we need, and what most of us actually want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Too bad polio wasn't a better shot.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 22 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They're scared of Democrats stacking the courts? Is that what was said? He reminds me of an old timey western card game where a player is accusing everyone of cheating with cards tucked up his sleeves

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

So his main objection is a loss of power

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

By the way, on packing the Supreme Court ... you may know this already. It's unconstitutional.

Every word uttered by a conservative is deception or manipulation.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Fucking die already.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 month ago

You know, if the orange shithead is such a liability, maybe you should have condemned his actions leading up to J6, you melted bastard. Then maybe he wouldn't be the guy running the show.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

During his speech, Spectrum reports that McConnell called the Walz-Harris ticket “the far left of the Democratic Party.”

“And by the way, that’s most Democrats today,” McConnell said, according to Spectrum.

I didn't realize the Dems were the far left party I'd been asking for. In this country, you can just say whatever and nobody checks. Apologies for multiple main-thread posts.

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Everyone looks like a leftist when you're an avowed fascist.

[–] eddanja@lemmy.world 17 points 4 weeks ago

I see the necromancy is still serving him well.

Die mad about it.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago

Oh, he's more worried about the nightmare for the GOP. Not for the country. Imagine that - he's more worried about the potential for the power of a political party to be diminished than he is about the end of the country.

[–] poprocks@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Mitch needs to go away. Retire already you old bag.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 weeks ago

That Turtle Mitch dares comment on packing the supreme court is just inconceivable

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Sounds Iike an amazing dream andaybe we can curb stomp the fascists ideas into the ground.

load more comments
view more: next ›