this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
112 points (91.8% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4547 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 47 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I still think Hillary only lost because of her "Basket of Deplorables" hubris speech, she acted like she didn't have to earn the position.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That was a big factor, as was Comey. However, let's not forget Julian Assange releasing her emails and also how the DNC snuffed out Bernie. Her arrogance about it being her turn was just the nail on the coffin.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

in the same vein of arrogance... not campaigning in battle ground states....

also she had an uphill battle. She was facing an anti-establishment platform as the one person who practically embodied the establishment.

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

snuffing out sanders was also arrogance though.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Clinton lost because of a number of factors:

Republicans hated her and had spent decades nurturing and perfecting that hatred. None of them were ever going to vote for her, and her presence energized them in favor of any opponent, regardless of who that might be.

So naturally, her campaign did their best to promote Trump as her opponent, falsely believing that he would be easier to beat than the bowl of lukewarm unflavored oatmeal from an unpopular political dynasty that was Jeb Bush.

Add to that, we were at the end of the Obama administration, which for progressives was a pretty big disappointment. And we were expected to vote for the person who ran to his right in 2008, and who fought bitterly for a healthcare policy that was essentially the disappointment we got. No public option and an individual mandate was what she ran on, what we voted against in 2008, and exactly what we got stuck with anyway. Add to that, there was still a lot of resentment because of all the flag pin/"as far as I know" bullshit she pulled during the '08 primaries.

And then there was all the fuckery her and her pets at the DNC pulled against Sanders and all the resentment that followed that.

And then she picked someone to her right for VP as a huge slap in the face to progressives. There was no reason to pick Kaine. No Republican was going to be swayed by that pick. It was exclusively a "fuck you" to everyone to her left.

And then she didn't bother to campaign in swing states she needed to win.

And THEN the email investigation broke.

2016 was absolute proof that voter enthusiasm beats "Shut up, I'm the boss. You're voting like I order you to or you're getting this guy I selected to use as a threat against you." Clinton was a uniquely garbage candidate with terrible political instincts.

[–] Hazzia@infosec.pub 19 points 1 month ago

Exactly this. My mom's convinced that Harris won't win because "if America couldn't elect a woman in 2016..." Like no, America couldn't elect a presidential candidate who was an arrogant asshole and took their victory for granted. And I hope that holds true this round, Harris 2024!

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

thank you for not letting me succumb to simplistic explanations 😊

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Saving this comment, thanks

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

I think she was so obsessed with it being a coronation, she just like fully forgot to register some places?

also being a delusional piece of shit lib when america signaled thats not what they wanted in the primaries? not super helpful. it took skill to lose to trump, a special gift.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 10 points 1 month ago

Sure, but if yelling at self defeating morons worked there wouldn't be living billionaires.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Calling 9%* of the population deplorable wasn't what did it.

It was the fact that her policies were uninspiring and to the right of what most Democrats wanted and to the left of what Republicans wanted.

It was her arrogance and entitlement, acting, as you so rightly point out, like the presidency was owed to her.

It was her lack of respect for the left two thirds of the Dem base, including her baseless smears of Bernie, her demands for voters to shut up and accept her as inevitable and also right about everything.

It was not campaigning in crucial states out of an unjustified certainty that they'd vote for her no matter what.

It was all the conspiracy theories and pseudo-scandals that Republicans have been making up about her and her rapist husband since she was First Lady.

It was Comey choosing to announce right before the election that, while she hadn't broken any laws, he thought that her emails were Super duper problematic.

And yes, it was also Russian meddling. However, Trump would never have gotten within cheating distance of the EC win if not for all of the above.

*while people keep saying she called half the country deplorable, she said "half of them are a basket of deplorables" about Trump voters, who were only 18% of the population.

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Her husband won with "third way" bullshit, which totally did not work the third time around.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Correct on both accounts. And it seems like even the DNC might have finally found that out now!

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think she lost because of Comey at the end. It shaved whatever margin she could have won

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Also didn't help that Clinton was so unlikeable and out-of-touch. Militarily and Economically she fell along Republican lines too often and she wasn't particularly progressive beyond Socially. Even then it always felt like unless it was Women's rights she was reluctant to rock the boat.

She was a rich white lady career politician with a cheating former President husband and a hawkish reputation. Don't get me wrong: I voted for her and think she'd have been a decent president, but Kamala and Tim are FAAAAR better than her and her forgettable VP pick ever were.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 6 points 1 month ago

This comment above goes in to full detail and I think sums Clinton up perfectly - but I agree with you: Comey was the death knell. Without that I still think she would have gotten away with everything else.

[–] Drusenija@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know it wasn't likely the cause, but the "Pokemon go to the polls" quote still lives rent free in my head over how cringy it was 😅

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hawk Tuah to the polls, kids

[–] Drusenija@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Vote on that thang!

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

While it may not be the sole reason, it is where I would point to as where she lost the election. It was as bad or worse than Romney's binders full of women comment.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Women aren't unelectable. Clinton was.

Remember Ann Richards?

Governor of Texas.
Woman.
Democrat.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Richards

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Martha Layne Collins, Kentucky Governor 83-87. Democrat.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_Layne_Collins

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She still received 3 million more votes than Trump. So not quite “unelectable:” she only lost due to vote distribution.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, because the overvotes in California and New York don't count once you hit 50%+1.

[–] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Kamala is much more likeable than Clinton. I really think that's why she lost in 2016, not because of her politics but because no one liked her as a person.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

A big part of that was the idea that she was entitled to the presidency, that it was "her turn".

That'll turn voters off like nothing else.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While true, it's a really low bar to be more liked than Hilary. It was more than just her being unlikable that lost her the election, but a lot of it can be boiled down to that.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It was a lot of things that cost her the election because she had such a bad opponent. So many things that if they’d gone differently would’ve resulted in her victory

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 1 month ago

Hillary is and was an unlikeable shithead. They acted like she deserved it. End of story.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 20 points 1 month ago

They need to not use Hillary Clinton’s photo in this article. Fuck Hillary Clinton

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

“The Fact of Hillary Unelectabilty”

I held my nose voting for Hillary. Because I knew she was better than the alternatives. Momala/Big Dad Energy will get my vote wholeheartedly and enthusiastically.

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago
[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Atlantic - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Atlantic:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/08/kamala-harris-2024-comparison-hillary-clinton-2016/679343/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support