this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
325 points (97.7% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4620 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 67 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I listened to the little bit of the interview they had, and he's just a shitty used car salesman.

[–] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

Always has been

[–] finley@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Used cars are one of the few things he actually hasn’t tried (and failed) to sell, which is ironic as he’s probably be pretty good at it.

[–] tektite@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We've got fantastic cars, the best cars. They've got all the best parts; windows, air conditioning, leather... nice leather seats. You like leather? I've got a leather couch in my penthouse. White leather, very classy. JD says it chafes but I think it's classy. Made in Germany, you been to Germany? Magnificent couch makers in Germany. And they've got nice cars in Germany but nothing like these cars, we've only got the best cars on this lot. You driven a folkswagon? Wonderful family car, you can fit all your kids in this car, great for kids I'm told. You have kids? I've got my daughter Ivanka, she fits on my lap in this car, it's very roomy. Ivanka? No, she's 42. Very beautiful, everyone agrees, very beautiful, magnificent smell. She smells like the women's changing rooms at Macy's, almost as good as the smell of a new car. You ever test driven? I've never driven myself, they'd be asking all the time, drive here, drive here, drive there; can't get away. They always want me to drive but I say no, I don't drive, never felt like it.

Why did I type this

[–] finley@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump, if nothing else, stimulates the imagination and inspires mockery and satire.

[–] iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Love him or hate him (and make no mistake, I loathe absolutely that abysmal fuckstain) he has an extremely identifiable manner of speaking

[–] finley@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago
[–] SLfgb@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago
[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He's selling shitty used cars or he's a shitty salesman selling used cars?

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He either wants to stay in power until death as dictator, or, since he only cares about himself, after the four years cycle elections won't matter anymore because the 22nd amendment

[–] holdthecheese@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

My money is on the fact that he doesn't care what happens after he leaves office. He just wants to win and avoid jail.

[–] ZhaoYadang@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why ask the liar to explain what he meant? He meant what he said, just like in 2020 when he said he would only accept the results of the election if he won.

There won’t be another presidential election if he wins. Not a fair one, at least. Vance will do what Pence wouldn’t; declare all electoral votes against Trump to be fraudulent. Make sure Congress gets to decide who wins, voting by state, with one vote per state. More Republican delegations than Democratic means Trump wins. Then the stooges on the Supreme Court rubber-stamp it. Dictator for life. With scarier people waiting in the wings for after he dies (Hawley is terrifying).

Emigrate now if you can.

[–] Dultas@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

just like in 2020 when he said he would only accept the results of the election if he won

That was a lie too. He wouldn't have accepted a win either. He would have claimed he won by more just like 2016.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago

He didn't even win the vote in 2016, just the electoral college.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

He's saying exactly what he means. He doesn't intend to win this election by votes and won't need votes in the future no matter what happens.

Johnson will refuse to certify the results of the election that put Democrats in the House, claiming some kind of bullshit irregularities with no proof, leaving the House controlled by the Republicans. They’ll then claim irregularities in the presidential election and force a contingent election where they have a 100% chance of electing Trump no matter what the public votes.

More people need to be made aware that this is 100% legal for them to do, and more people need to be aware that it is almost certainly what they will try. The only thing that can possibly stop it is significant awareness by the mass population of Americans and significant publicity (similar to how mass awareness of Project 2025 turned it into a poison pill).

EDIT: Oh look, they’ve already started making it super-legal in battleground states: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/06/georgia-local-election-boards-allowed-withhold-vote-certification

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You are 100%, 1,000%, 10,000% right.

Remember how cool it was with Kamala up there and the local band playing, and people in the audience bopping around? That’s exactly how it was in Tiananmen Square for a while, and how it felt in Nicaragua when the Sandinistas were doing literacy and immunization, and a dawn of hope was growing that good people might get to run the country for once.

It’s not safe yet. Take it real fuckin serious.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn't this the whole purpose of the second amendment?

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] figjam@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Seimper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

Now you’re pressing him for answers? It’s a bit too late for that sweetie. You and all your media scumbag friends allowed Trump on your shows and didn’t ask him a hard question ONCE. Now you think it’s time?

Fuck you.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

.....and? Hello? What the fuck was Ingram's response when he repeated the claim right in front of her? Were the attacks still ridiculous? Did this author forget what the fuck he was just writing about?

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Weird answers. From an old person.

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Are we pretending that Laura Ingraham is a ~~hard hitting~~ journalist now?

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

He shouldn’t be allowed to run after Jan 6 yet alone this