this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
632 points (97.4% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4553 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 162 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (15 children)

Option 1 - seasoned government professional who can navigate politics with diplomacy

Option 2 - an old man who bankrupted ~~a~~ 4 _ casinos_ and has ties to russia, has zero political experience. edit - thanks everyone - traitor, felon, rapist, attempted a coup to overthrow the government, ex president consistently considered one of the worst terms america has seen.

How is this difficult, america

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, the old man had 4 years of being president where he broke everything he possibly could.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (5 children)

and republicans want him to do it again

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

How is this difficult, america

Mostly because of racists.

[–] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 month ago

Those casinos were in Atlantic City. He also lost tens of millions of dollars on one of the most famous and prestigious hotels in New York City. He lost money trying to sell mail-order steaks and whiskey in the United States. He also lost money trying to operate a university during the biggest education bubble in history. He also stole classified documents, 'lost' them, and got huge numbers of foreign assets killed. He openly advocates for ending democracy. And as the cherry on top of that shit sandwich, brags about sexually battering women.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You didn't even mention "serial rapist."

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Or "Epstein's BFF," or "multiple-times credibly accused child rapist."

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 11 points 1 month ago

Option 2 is also a traitor, and convicted felon.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

That option 2 is even being considered and still has a good shot at winning the presidency would seem to be proof that American democracy is deeply broken. Maybe it’s the education system, the two-party duopoly, the selling out of one party to Russia, foreign interference in general, corruption and the role of private money in elections/politics, a partisan Supreme Court, and/or just the election process itself. If a dipshit like that has a shot while blatantly campaigning on fascism, something’s not right.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Option 2 bankrupted four casinos.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] wolfeh@lemmy.world 113 points 1 month ago (8 children)

This won't matter if no one votes.

Also, Newsweek has been going far out of their way to paint a picture of Trump doing poorly even when he's not. Beware this source.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

But he was doing poorly. Newsweek has fallen off in quality, but so have lots of other papers too. The friggin New York Times was running articles about how trump was amazing and so much more vibrant than Biden. They had a big op-ed focusing on just Biden stepping down from the campaign, completely ignoring trump's failings.

Now it's obvious that they just wanted to cover a Democratic primary horse race. Trump is clearly just as slow as Biden, compared to Kamala.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 62 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good for the World sadly what happen in america have often worldwide repercussion

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As someone not in America, dear Americans, for the love of tits, go vote for Kamala. Sadly our lives could also depend on it.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

What if the main reason we’re voting for Kamala is our love of tits?

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I'll allow it, tits are wonderful. Tits for president!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Don't be ridiculous. Lions Fear Gorgonzola. An ancient proverb.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Got my fingers crossed for her

load more comments
view more: next ›