this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
623 points (99.5% liked)

politics

23281 readers
3066 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 168 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] peetabix@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago

Not enough eyeliner

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

This has been texted to some people 🤗

[–] Embargo@lemm.ee 138 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They've called your bluff, buddy and now you're going to have to take an absolute beating of a lifetime. Enjoy!

[–] PurpleTentacle@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

Not him, he'll take whatever he can get and sell it to his cultists as the world's greatest deal.

As usual, it's the US taking the beating ...

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The tariffs will be something Biden put in place and Trump removed to save the economy within a week.

[–] carbonari_sandwich@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

I will say, lots of people in my state remember the 2008 Economic Crisis as being caused by Obama.

[–] godot@lemmy.world 132 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Why would China be desperate?

China offers the cheapest high spec manufacturing in the world. If the US doesn’t buy that manufacturing, that leaves the rest of the world. Of course China wants American money, but it’s not going to devastate their economy in the short term. It’s a reasonable cost for providing China with so many opportunities, which they are aggressively pursuing, to cultivate deep seated international power.

The prevalence of Chinese manufacturing actually is a national problem for the US. While China has its pick of buyers, the US is stuck with one seller. The US should have been working for twenty years with India, Pakistan, Brazil, Indonesia, Vietnam, and maybe even some counties in Africa to create access to alternatives. It didn’t.

Weaning the US off Chinese manufacturing would take decades of elegant economic policy and diplomacy featuring several countries. China knows this is where it actually has power over the US.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 34 points 1 week ago

I have worked professionally with Chinese vendors and suppliers for years, both pre and post COVID. China offers the whole range of manufacturing, not just cheap labor but high tech and precision devices too. You want cheap injection molded toys for Happy Meals? Done. Precision machine tools for CNC? Can do. Medical imaging devices? No problem. Mass assembly of automotive cable looms? Easy. If a business wants quality product from China they can do it.

And much like the classic European model where a textile or steel industry would collect in a valley for logistic/resource reasons and organically form an industrial ‘core’ the same is true in China, but with a centralized planned economy. Vocational schools feed local industry with skilled workers like engineers or tool and die makers, so that region experiences further and further specialization and conglomeration.

There’s no coherent or comparable manufacturing:educational alliance in the US, closest we have is ‘feeder schools’ that partner with individual industrial/scientific giants on an ad-hoc basis.

[–] coyootje@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope they don't back down, even if that orange whimp ends up pulling back the tariffs. Don't re-engage with the US until they elect a decent leader. They should really feel the impact of electing such a moron for a internationally significant role.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Yep. If America doesn't have a severe depression &/or civil war, the mental illness of MAGA will continue destroying the country from within, and wreaking havoc with global stability.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think that underestimates the extent to which the Chinese economy is vulnerable to reduced demand from foreign partners. I'm not saying China's in a worse position than the US, since the US has a blithering imbecile traitor as President. But they're not invulnerable to economic shocks either.

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago

Part of my company's plan to weather the trade war was to stock up and wait for our competition to be priced out. We also expect the factories in China that supplied our competitors will shut down too. There is a ton of spare capacity with some of them and they work on slim margins. Even a short term downturn of orders can push many to close.

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

China will definitely suffer, but it also doesn't care. Public opinion supporting its actions are not a priority in China. Trump is starting to feel the bite his stupidity has taken him. Not sure if he understands completely, but he's getting an idea that he'll wear the blame. Not from the Maga, but from everyone else.

[–] match@pawb.social 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

China has been working with African countries for decades to build their supply lines. The US has had a blind spot over Africa the whole time

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not true, they've just done a better job and built infrastructure instead of corrupt power networks based on the threat of regime change

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

What do they got better principals than us? Wait are we the bad guys?

[–] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Also, China has a shitload of US debt that they can use as leverage

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which is why Trump tried to declare it void, as a very stupid person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Which makes the debt ceiling fight that's coming up even more interesting. (article from March 24th)

The U.S. is most likely to default on its $36 trillion national debt sometime between mid-July and early October if Congress doesn’t act, the Bipartisan Policy Center predicted Monday.

......

Debt limit forecasters are expected to release a narrower X-date prediction after most tax receipts have landed at the IRS in April. While it’s “quite unlikely,” there is still a possibility that the U.S. could run out of borrowing power in early June if that gush of tax revenue comes in far below projections, the Bipartisan Policy Center cautioned.

The cost-cutting efforts of the Department of Government Efficiency effort headed by Elon Musk could also affect cash flow enough to change the X-date prediction, along with the strength of the economy, tariffs and any new spending or cuts Congress approves, the center said.

Given how DOGE is inflating it's cost cutting savings by over $140 Billion, the tariff trade war, and congress' habit of pushing things to the brink when their luck is going to run out sooner or later -- this could get ugly quick.

Also, despite how much Trump wants to pretend he's a dictator, he's not. Both Congress and the Supreme Court have the power to stop this tariff idiocy at any point if the consequences get to be too bad. Xi is actually a dictator and the likelihood of any other power base overriding him is slim to none.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 95 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Art of the Deal:

  1. Behave recklessly and make threats to destroy the global economy
  2. Get pushback from allies
  3. Reverse course for allies, but behave even more recklessly against rival
  4. Rival realizes you don’t know what you’re doing
  5. Beg rival to engage
  6. Rival refuses
  7. Take insanely reckless actions toward rival
  8. Rival stands firm
  9. Get told by billionaires that you’re messing with their profits and, as a side note, domestic stability
  10. Reverse course for rivals, look incredibly weak and get exposed for not having a clue what you’re doing on the global stage
  11. ?????????????????
  12. Make America Great Again
[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Make America Great Depression Again

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 71 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Why would they be?

Trump has effectively handed all of the USA's soft power over to the EU, China & Russia, depending on the part of the planet we are discussing.

All of it.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago

Not really "handed" over" as much as made it disappear. It's up to other countries to fill the vacuum.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

In Trump's words, "he doesn't have the cards" "he has bad cards". Which also makes it fairly clear he's never played poker or has and is baffled by the rules.

[–] jecxjo@midwest.social 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It makes more and more sense that he failed to keep a casino afloat.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wish I could find the youtube interview with someone who worked with him during his casino mismanagement days. The guy said that he never saw anyone know so little about what he was supposed to be running. He knew absolutely nothing about any of the games at all. Not poker, craps, roulette, or blackjack.

[–] jecxjo@midwest.social 6 points 1 week ago

That reminds me of an article from back in the late 90's or early 00's about how much of the money he did make came from other people using him basically. They would talk him into projects and make him think it was his idea. He was such an easy mark and now we are starting to see it. Simply making fun of him will cause him to double down, major ass kissing will make him like you.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's like he's NOT a deal maker, but some kind of absolutely unqualified idiot!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 63 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was always eventually going to come down to US vs China for economic leadership of the world. Trump ceded that fight. Or accelerated it in a way that makes real conflict a greater concern than it was before, depending on the aggression/militarism of future administrations.

Trump accelerated. Idiot

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago

He needs a W and has pissed off anyone capable of giving him one.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 50 points 1 week ago

He abuses people hardest to try to force them to submit. It may work with some of his business deals but in international politics with an economic superpower? What a clown.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 week ago

Trump is desperate.

No quotes or further words needed.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 44 points 1 week ago

Mussolini his ass already.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

China nailed the "never interrupt your enemy while he's in the midst of making a mistake" strategy. Trump absolutely weakened his position.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It probably goes without saying at this point, but deporting someone to a culture in which they're not competent is wildly immoral, and doing so in such a way that they end up encarcerated in subhuman conditions especially despite not committing a crime in that jurisdiction is monstrous.

[–] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If he doesn't die of old age in his second term, he will die in prison after. Along with a good part of his cronies.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I hope you're right, but he would be the first to do so in a very long time.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you ignore the morality, it is also supremely stupid. Killing your citizens and stealing their stuff might be a "shot in the arm" for a terrible nation, but it also means all of the skills and support they could offer the nation is gone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 24 points 1 week ago

Do not back down China! I love to see that dumbass flounder like the fat toxic fish he is.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's playing poker with the Chinese who love gambling and he's also an idiot who thinks he's a great gambler while holding all his cards backwards

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago

Fart of the seal 🦭💨

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

Trump is the jealous ex who thought they would find someone better after breaking up with you

[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago
[–] LarryLurkman@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Jesus Christ Donald Trump sucks.

load more comments
view more: next ›