this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
226 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2554 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 187 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Millennials rise up. Childless is a valid fucking choice.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 140 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Not that I disagree but Kamala married Doug in 2014 and has two step children, aged 29 and 25. Or 19 and 15 at the time of marriage.

She is certainly a mother if she wants that title.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 68 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ah, this I was unaware of... well then those Republicans can get fucked. As a fellow parent by marriage exclusively kids are kids regardless of whether someone wants to throw a step in there... and discounting stepchildren reeks of icky eugenics bullshit.

[–] 5C5C5C@programming.dev 62 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's well established that she has an excellent relationship with her kids-by-marriage, and even became close friends with their bio-mom while attending the kids' extra-curricular activities together.

And my personal favorite part: the kids refer to her as Momala, because step-mom just didn't feel right to them.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 25 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Those are fluffy facts but they put the Trump family to shame by comparison (especially with Baron coming out as yet another weirdo) and might win over some voters. I'd personally love to know more about her platform ideas but these things don't hurt.

[–] 5C5C5C@programming.dev 23 points 4 months ago

Honestly I think it's more than fluff. Her relationship with her family says a lot about her character and her integrity. She really is the anti-Trump in every conceivable way, and I'm really starting to believe that the stark difference between the two is going to pay off.

[–] __ghost__@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

What's weird about the kid

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He's growing up to be a weird political person and embracing the GOP.

[–] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Was really hoping it was going to be a one-and-done with the Trump family name in politics in this country. Fuck.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

Did you miss all of them infiltrating the RNC? Hell even Kimberly Gilfoil keeps somehow getting the spotlight and she's an awful speaker.

[–] __ghost__@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

What did anyone expect?

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

He's The Cyber

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 20 points 4 months ago

Also, one typically does not have kids at age.... 49.

[–] Dempf@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 months ago

Apparently they call her "momala".

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 93 points 4 months ago (2 children)

When this doesn't work, expect angry black female next.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 43 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 4 months ago

Trump will definitely say the n word if he uses uppity.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

you can absolutely feel that one waiting in the wings. wonder if they will combine it with evil-jailer / hippie-prosecutor for 2x the wall action.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

There’s just so many well known hippie prosecutors

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 68 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

dude they really have nothing. this is so pathetic lol... you'd think they have something but all they've gone up with so far has been:

  • is woman
  • is not white
  • laughs
  • is stepmom

the one thing that might actually hurt her support is that she's a prosecutor but they can't use that because they're supposed to be the tough on crime crowd but also nominated a convicted felon so it's really dumb to bring up the fact that she's a prosecutor.

edit: new attack line just dropped; add it to the list:

  • is against plastic straws

man, she's really done for now

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

so it’s really dumb

That part is not what's stopping them.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You're making the mistake of assuming they will act logically, instead of like a brainwashed death cult. If logic mattered they wouldn't be Republicans.

[–] Sunroc@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

They want to overhaul the justice system and redefine right and wrong, so they could easily attack her while being on their same message.

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 66 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They’re not morally satisfied with anyone who’s not a white father of at least 5 children from at least 3 mothers.

[–] elvith 25 points 4 months ago

*underage mothers

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 58 points 4 months ago (2 children)

George Washington was sterile and, of course, had no children.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But the sons of his opponents wished that he was their dad.

[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He'll save children, but not the British children.

Added context: https://youtu.be/sbRom1Rz8OA?si=x2kIUb6LsEi8I-Ac

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 45 points 4 months ago

The GOP wants to control every aspect of women's lives and their bodies. That’s why Harris' life choices and political success infuriate them

...

But, of course, whether or not Harris is a parent, or how she parents, is not the GOP’s real issue. The real issue is that the GOP wants to exert control over every aspect of women’s lives, beginning with their bodies. The Dobbs decision was the beginning, but it is far from where they hope to take us. The Project 2025 manifesto wants to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception. Vance, himself, has said he’s in favor of a national abortion ban. And there is an increasing push on the right to roll back no-fault divorce.

Harris represents an idea of womanhood that flies in the face of all this.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 21 points 4 months ago

The real reason is that they are fascist and they want to do fascist things. And they can't do as many fascist things if Trump is not elected as president.

[–] willsenior@lemm.ee 16 points 4 months ago

She's not a Targaryan. We don't give a fuck.

[–] ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Moving heir talking points so fast was very... Very telling.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 months ago

Bombing their set, furiously flipping through their recipe cards for a bit that works, but all they have is junk