this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
67 points (67.5% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4536 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Regardless of whether it would have been the more advantageous decision to run Biden before all of this - health and all - it's increasingly clear that our best choice is going to be replacing Biden on the ticket. Not thrilled about it. I don't know that this was worth throwing away a massive incumbent and name recognition advantage, but it's a moot point - too many public figures on Biden's side have came out in opposition. That track is rendered much less friendly by this public discourse. Our best chance now is in Biden stepping down.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

As much as I hate to say it, this is likely a choice about which donors still support him vs. his chances of winning, or what any of the mere mortals in the voting bloc want.

If enough donors bail (and it looks like Clooney is a major fundraiser), that will likely seal the deal much more so than looking at Biden's dismal, impossible-to-win numbers or polling Democratic voters about what they want...

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"I want a different nominee" does not mean "I won't support Biden if he is the nominee".

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Clooney is directly responsible for that "40 million dollar night" Biden had.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's actually becoming increasingly clear that there is no replacement for Biden. We have polling data now and none of the other options come close to Biden.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah I'm with you. There's too much inertia against him now. The Biden team needs to approach Biden with a plan to get him to step aside, not just ask him to consider it. They need to identify replacement candidate(s) ASAP and get them in front of voters. Starting from scratch right now is gonna be tough, but it's absolutely winnable in this climate.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

too many public figures on Biden’s side have came out in opposition

AKA Trump supporters.

None of those fuckers could come together and figure out who would replace him before dragging him publicly for weeks. So now we have either Biden who is being let down by his own party, or....no one? To face Trump who promised to be a dictator day 1 and has a literal plan to overthrow the government?

Everyone has failed and if Trump is elected it is more these peoples faults than they will ever admit or realize.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

AKA Trump supporters.

Man, I'm not exactly the biggest fan of our Dem congresscritters, but they're useful idiots for Trump at most. They're not Trump supporters.

None of those fuckers could come together and figure out who would replace him before dragging him publicly for weeks. So now we have either Biden who is being let down by his own party, or…no one? To face Trump who promised to be a dictator day 1 and has a literal plan to overthrow the government?

Everyone has failed and if Trump is elected it is more these peoples faults than they will ever admit or realize.

I don't necessarily disagree, but regardless of their motives or how well-thought out or not this is, the damage is done. If it's a blunder, it's a blunder - the hand is off the piece. We have to decide what our next move is, and play it as best we can.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 months ago

I'm tired of assuming everyone is an idiot or incompetent. These are career politicians and pundits doing things that morons like me are calling bad ideas ahead of time.

They know what this would do. They did it anyways. Regardless of their intent they knew what the public response would be. They are complicit.