this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
332 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4426 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Harris only received five percent of Republican votes — less than the six percent Joe Biden won in 2020 when he beat Trump, as well as the seven percent won by Hillary Clinton in 2016 when she lost to him. While Harris won independents and moderates, she did so by smaller margins than Biden did in 2020.

Meanwhile, Harris lost households earning under $100,000, while Democratic turnout collapsed. Votes are still being counted, but Harris is on pace to underperform Biden’s 2020 totals by millions of votes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] b34k@lemmy.world 43 points 8 hours ago (7 children)

Yes, my friend was one of them. I was shocked when 2 weeks before election he told me he was planning on not voting.

I asked why and he cited holding the same position Isreal as Biden, and courting republicans like Cheney, saying that was not a good look for the party at all.

I told him it’s not ideal, but we need to vote to keep Trump out…. Sometimes we just have to be pragmatic.

He responded saying it’s the Dem establishment that keeps allowing a boogey man like Trump to rise so they can shove center right corporatists down our throats. He said he was abstaining from voting to send a message to the DNC, and followed it up with, “we survived a first Trump term, I’m sure we can survive a second.”

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

I asked why and he cited holding the same position Isreal as Biden, and courting republicans like Cheney, saying that was not a good look for the party at all.

I told him it’s not ideal

And this is what you don't get. There's a huge fucking gap between "not ideal" and "supporting genocide to the point that Dick Cheney likes you." And you didn't acknowledge it. You just belittled it with "not ideal." Because you couldn't admit that what Democrats were doing was monstrous and unconscionable.

Anyone who pulls this "you didn't get 100% of everything you want, but..." shit? They got 100% of everything they wanted. Especially the genocide support. And especially Cheney.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 42 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

we survived a first Trump term

As long as you weren't one of the million Americans who died of COVID thanks to his misadministration.

Or the Capitol police who died as a result from his attempted insurrection.

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 22 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, he’s an ex-pat who was living in Hong Kong, S Korea, and Vietnam for most of Trumps first term… so I’m sure he didn’t feel it as hard as most of us who were here for it.

[–] Jerkface@lemmy.world 20 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

"Thousands of my countrymen will perish, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make."

[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 5 hours ago

It's a mistake reasoning as if you're taking of one guy. Maybe one third of your population voted, and most of those voted for Trump, it means that most of you guys are pretty ok with dying during the next COVID or whatever

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"we survived"

Many didn't and even more won't this time, your friend is a genocide supporter

[–] Saleh 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So not voting for genocidal candidates now make genocide support? stop projecting.

The Dems were hellbent on supporting gneocide. People chose to be fine with it, even attacking people who called it out.

The flak we got here for saying for months the Dems need to stop the genocide support to win the election now raises the question whether they were just tactically wrong, or whether they werent really into the genocide themselves. That would explain why now there is efforts to project it on the other people.

At every turn we were told that supporting genocide is better than supporting genocide and homophobia. Saying we should push for a non genocidal candidate, for which there was plenty of time at first, got immediately shut down.

The most consistent position of the Biden/Harris fans was to accept genocide, because that was the strongest criticism raised consistently against them. Now you end up not only having lost the election but having lost the election because you were in support of genocide.

It is no wonder that Trump managed to win, when the center is so morally bankrupt. It is no wonder that there was no way to inspire people to vote for Harris and Biden if the messaging constantly was "yeah we are morally bankrupt and we are also genociders and racists, but we are less than the other side. This is as good as we allow to happen".

This is on the Democrat elites and their supporters. Own up to it instead of projecting the blame.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Democrats: Support Israel, say they want the conflict to stop and a two States solution. Want to send weapons to Ukraine. Support minorities in the US.

Republicans: Support the genocide of Palestinians, of Ukrainians and of minorities inside the USA.

Voting for Republicans and not voting (so leaving the door open to them) is supporting genocide.

[–] Saleh 1 points 2 hours ago

So every Israel aka genocide supporter had a safe vote with Trump. Everyone who opposes it had no choice with either party.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

He responded saying it’s the Dem establishment that keeps allowing a boogey man like Trump to rise so they can shove center right corporatists down our throats. He said he was abstaining from voting to send a message to the DNC, and followed it up with, “we survived a first Trump term, I’m sure we can survive a second.”

I remember when I was 14.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] b34k@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I am definitely in the camp that Trump part 2 will be worse…. but we don’t know for sure yet

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Keep in mind Trump is pushing 80 and has a steady diet of McDonalds and Diet Coke. Here’s to hoping nature takes its course.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Do you think Vance is going to be better?

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Funny thing is your friends opinions are popular on lemmy.ml which makes it seem like foreign actors are pushing these talking points. They definitely worked in Trumps favor.

[–] Saleh 1 points 3 hours ago

Now the blue MAGA is talking about the election being stolen...

Seriosuly how did you expect to win against Trump by copying Trump? People always chose the original authoritarian nazi asshole over the knock-off copy.

You know what wouldnt have worked in Trumps favor? Stopping the genocide in Gaza. That would have led to a landslide victory for the Dems.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -4 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Keeps allowing Trump to rise? What does he expect the Dems to do?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 17 minutes ago

They could have appointed an AG that wasn't useless on purpose, for starters.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I don't agree with him, but I think he's expecting them to support liberal progressive policies. Seems to be taking the stance of "if we can't improve things it's better to watch it all burn rather than slowly rot".

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Tell him that not voting to convince them to run liberal progressive policies won't work. You can't play Mexican standoff because the Dems have an out: the center voters.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

They tried that this time. They basically told the left to fuck off and die. Moving to the right has very publicly failed.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So no one is ever allowed to think otherwise. Gotcha.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What exactly do you think should have been done differently for Harris to activate this "just win with centrists" option? Because it very much seems like that was just tried and failed miserably.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Was just in a very long thread with him, but he seems to think economic issues are exclusively centrist.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not OP so I don't actually know him so I can't tell him anything, although I do know one person like that. As for your point I'm not sure that actually follows since those center voters didn't show up to save Harris this time. If the DNC keeps losing elections at some point, assuming we're all still here and we even still have elections, they will have to try something different. It's a very risky play but I also can't say it won't work.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

Harris relied on the left showing up for their rights and for democracy. That was a ton of her campaign. And the left didn't show up. If they don't show up for that, they won't show up for anything. They will try something different and that's going all in on the center voter, who actually show up.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I replied to your other comment where you said basically the same thing, but the short version is there clearly isn't enough center voters for that to be a winning strategy. If they try that next election (If there even is a next election) it's going to be an even more lopsided victory for the Republicans.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

See my other response. It's the other way around, there isn't enough left (or rather, if they can't show up for their own human fucking rights and mfing democracy, they will never never never show up for literally anything). The center is the big juicy middle that exists, that Trump appealed to, who actually show up, whose votes are worth double (because it's a vote for you and a vote taken away from the other party), and where elections are won.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There's left wing economic policies as well. Running on anti-monoploy and increased taxes on the rich, would be an excellent way to go further left and is exactly I think what a lot of people were looking for this election. Ignoring the economy is never a winning strategy unless the economy is already doing really well which it very much isn't.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yes, but the left never shows up. If they can't show up for their own human rights, they will never never never show up. The Dems will never, ever put themselves into a situation where they rely on the left voters ever again, because they never show up. Harris said she'd tax the rich, and the left didn't show up.

Ignoring the economy is never a winning strategy

I have no idea how you are missing what I'm saying. The economy is center policy. Yes yes yes. The Dems will go hard on the economy for the center voter. They will follow Bill Clinton's "it's the economy, stupid". That's how Bill Clinton won, by going to center. That's what the Dems will do in the future, focus on the economy to win the center voter. Again, that is center policy, not left.

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

You’re right. I don’t buy this narrative that the dems lost because they were left enough. The polls show voters were motivated by inflation and thought Biden’s progressive policies were to blame.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Well Biden for example could've done a much better job actually persecuting him for his crimes. He can do that as the head of the Executive branch.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 20 minutes ago

Prosecute is probably the word you're looking for, but I wouldn't mind a bit of persecution being mixed in. Better than just letting him walk.