this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
667 points (97.8% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2694 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A top economist has joined the growing list of China's elite to have disappeared from public life after criticizing Xi Jinping, according to The Wall Street Journal. 

Zhu Hengpeng served as deputy director of the Institute of Economics at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) for around a decade.

CASS is a state research think tank that reports directly to China's cabinet. Chen Daoyin, a former associate professor at Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, described it as a "body to formulate party ideology to support the leadership."

According to the Journal, the 55-year-old disappeared shortly after remarking on China's sluggish economy and criticizing Xi's leadership in a private group on WeChat.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 154 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (15 children)

If you think the Chinese economy is bad now, wait 15 years. No amount of sending economists to the gulag will hide this disaster.

Edit: tankie downvotes are like nectar of the gods to me. Your precious CCP will wither like a plant in the desert.

[–] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 68 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I’ve already been banned from Hexbear. Bunch of assclowns over there.

Edit: and now lemmygrad

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago (5 children)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's easy mode, since Rule 2 is basically "don't write a fact about China."

[–] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

Well damn, I’ll try harder next time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Shard@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Arbitrary bans from overly sensitive mods? Straight to Jail.

Made a comment about tankies in lemmy getting mad over some news about China getting hit with influence ops by the US. Believe it or not, ban.

[–] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s okay man, it takes me a few seconds to scroll through all my bans. It’s funny because all these pro China dweebs are living in the USA. Can’t even commit to the bit and just sit there all day posting anti USA or western stuff. They are obnoxious.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

They are privileged children sheltered from reality by mommy and daddy's money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 31 points 2 months ago

What a stark example of Mao's legacy (look at the dip between ages 60 and 65).

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Who thinks Chinese economy is bad now??

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

92 upvotes would suggest a lot of people.

But everything you could say about China rings just as true in Europe, in Japan and Korea, in India, in Russia...

Global populations are heading for a heavy sag, but westerners only know how to heckle the Evil Foreigners.

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Funny because I'm European, and the GDP per capita levels of most EU countries are at 2008 levels.

As for a population pyramid, China will face the same problem as other countries as you say, possibly more magnified.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Arn_Thor@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Lots of people, especially the Chinese. The sentiment about work, investment, economic prospects, consumption are all quite bad. The central bank is cutting rates. Just today the government dipped their toes into the helicopter money game. The only thing keeping the party going is exports

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What is this supposed to show?

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is what a healthy population looks like:

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 58 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Even then, it isn't healthy, just healthier. The USA is still going to going to experience economic issues of a growing elderly population, it just won't be as bad.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The US have the benefit of essentially limitless immigration that they can adjust at will. On the other hand, China's leadership, being Han supremacist, is not receptive to immigration at all.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 9 points 2 months ago

Immigration definitely helps, especially compared to China. I'm just noting that there will still be some decrease in the ratio of retired workers to current workers.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

The US have the benefit of essentially limitless immigration

glances at US immigration policy

Does it?

China’s leadership, being Han supremacist, is not receptive to immigration at all.

Wit drier than a lint trap.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Coming from one of the foremost resident tankies here, that's a glowing compliment. Thank you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Have you.... have you seen how Americans have been talking about the border? Especially this election cycle? I don't know if would characterize either party's constituencies as "receptive".

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You realize there's more to immigration than the border between Mexico and the US, right?

I know they ignore it, but you don't have to follow along with them.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

50 million immigrants in the US, and that data is 5 years old. Germany comes in second with 13 million. It’s not even close. I don’t see how a demographic crisis could happen, even if they hypothetically cut immigration in half

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

It's all talk. Corpos crave dirt cheap desperate immigrant workers and will make sure neither party messes this up.

[–] rammer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The US have the benefit of essentially limitless immigration

Except that even in the Americas the population is declining. There is a limit to it. The US can outlast many other countries because of immigration but it too has to face the same problem as everyone else.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Not really. They are the #1 immigration destination. If the US runs out of potential immigrants that means every other country is far worse off. This game is like the old joke about outrunning a bear: you don't need to run faster than the bear — you only need to be faster than the guy next to you.

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This is the new normal for highly developed economies. The best they can hope for is a 1 to 1 replacement of their population. We're not likely to see another baby boom occur.

We're not going to see a typical population pyramid any more. Because that means a large infant death rate and either war, disasters or a massive suicide epidemic cutting away the young adult population to get the pyramid shape.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago

Given that the amount of habitable land will decrease causing mass migrations, you don't need a 1 to 1 ratio to maintain a population size.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago

Basically, yes. The sides are nearly parallel, which is great. Compare with China's, which forms a steep V. Once GenX hits retirement age they are completely screwed. The CCP's recent push for "traditional family values" and increased birth rates is no coincidence.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The birthing rates are only dropping, in 15 years all of those people will be to old to work but there are not nearly enough to replace them.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Thank you for the clarification.

load more comments (11 replies)