this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
301 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4620 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teft@lemmy.world 249 points 1 month ago (6 children)

“I think we all can agree, whether people like him or they don’t like him, in light of what happened to him on Saturday, he has proven to be one tough SOB,”

Uh, no we can't. He is and always will be a giant thin-skinned coward. Where did he prove to be tough?

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 136 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A shot grazed his fucking ear. Every teen goth girl has taken more direct hits to their ear.

Plus, he doesn’t listen to anyone anyway. The only more useless part of his body that they could have hit is his hair.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Did we ever get actual footage of his ear? The day of, we saw an ear with blood on it, then today we saw an ear with a bandage covering it. Are there any shots of the ear cleaned up enough to see actual tissue damage?

The tinfoil hat in me is still wondering if the performative display we saw was something like a gunman hired to pop a few shots at expendable followers behind Trump, so that Trump can duck below where the cameras were aimed, slather some shit on his ear, then pop up with that cheesy movie-esque fist pump.

Kinda expected info on the gunman to snuff those kinds of theories, but it's sounding like he was just another dipshit Nazi who could easily be duped into a deal like that, then popped off by the SS.

The ear itself could disprove it, but so far I haven't seen any articles with a pic.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump is too much of a pussy to let someone fire live rounds in his general direction.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Forethought has never been his strong suit. If the on-paper pitch was good enough, it'd be in-character for him to just go for it without considering any of the 'what if's.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

If you see the shot that shows the bullet frozen in air, you can see trumps ear ripped at the top before the blood has started spurting. In one of the ones with his fist raised. You can zoom in on his ear and clearly see the whole thing has become purple, swollen, and inflamed.

There are still a lot of questions about this event, but I’m pretty confident that Trump’s ear actually took some sort of damage from something, and so far the most likely cause seems to be a bullet.

I don't have a link to it, but I did see a picture from the rally showing it, and the best way I can describe it is that he looked like that guy Mike Tyson took a bite out of. There was a decent chunk of cartilage that got blasted out of the upper and outer edge of his ear, maybe about an inch across at the widest part.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn't die from getting grazed by a bullet, on the ear...

Next speaker is gonna say Trump cured cancer without a hint of irony.

[–] UristMcHolland@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It wasn't even the bullet, his got nipped by glass shrapnel from the promter.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is based on incorrect early speculation. A bullet nicked his ear directly. Not that it really matters.

[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Was this confirmed by anyone but shitty Reddit sleuths? The teleprompter being shattered also holds validity.

When glass like that breaks with that much kinetic energy, it’s not a movie style explosion. The particles collide into each other and ridiculous velocity and one very likely could have sliced into his ear.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is a photograph that happened to catch the bullet in mid-flight just short of hitting Trump. There has been no credible statements from anyone who would know saying it was from the teleprompter. There isn't even any reporting that the teleprompter was hit. It's just one of a dozen fabricated narratives. If you can't "sleuth" any better than this, you are going to be steamrolled by AI generated propaganda.

[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The bullet in the picture doesn’t really prove anything. It could be 2” from his head or 2’ from his head.

I would hope the world is smarter than that and could realize it, along with understanding the rupture mechanics behind the glass of a teleprompter shattering, but I guess not.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You’re as bad as every other conspiracy nut.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think you mean the mechanics of a teleprompter sitting there since, as I said, there is no evidence whatsoever that it was hit, and eyewitnesses saying it wasn't. Sure, it's possible. The bullet might also have struck a passing bird and it's beak flew into Trump's ear.

I get conspiracy theories that drive towards some desired political ends, but this random bullshit is just dumb. Somebody shot a bullet and as a result Trump has a bloody ear. Why should anyone even care if it hit directly or was a secondary impact? It changes nothing of any relevance.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He refused to leave without his shoes and pumped his fist in the air. Strength.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

He refused to leave without his ~~shoes ~~and pumped his fist in the air. Strength.

his LIFTS. he wouldn't leave them on the stage to be a photo op. because he's ashamed of them.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

He raised his fist after the sniper team had already killed the shooter while missing a little chunk of his ear. Super brave. I remember after my dad broke his leg in 16 places in an accident he went to work in a wheel chair and kept at it until he got out of it after the doctors told him he would likely not be able to walk. That's tough. There are a lot of actually tough SOBs in America powering through their own problems to do what needs to be done. Trump isn't one of them.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

It takes a tough man to worry about his shoes after getting shot at.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Guy got his ear-pierced and we call that "fighting for his life", gimme a fucking break

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 204 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Corrupt class traitor shows his true colors, every teamster should be voting this clown out.

Also this is on top of him challenging a Republican to a fist fight this year during a committee session where he and the Republican idiot had to be gaveled down by Bernie.

Absolute 🤡

[–] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“I refuse to keep doing the same things my predecessors did,” O’Brien said in a speech that criticized both parties. “Today the Teamsters are here to say we are not beholden to anyone or any party. We will create an agenda and work with a bipartisan coalition ready to accomplish something real for the American worker.”

Too cowardly to even admit he’s a conservative. I’m sure he’ll be speaking at the DNC too.

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If he shows up to the DNC he should be booed off the damn stage.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ugh, I hate doing this but biden hasn't been 100 with unions. I don't think trumps better but it's a sore subject for sure. I will say biden did get the rail works sick days. If that was the concession he made and things are truly better I'd ease up.

On the other hand the supreme court has signaled that they will intervene in union related disputes and in one of their recent rulings may have some chilling effects.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 66 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He was thinking about money...for himself. Fuck everyone else, of course.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Like a true Republican!

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 64 points 1 month ago
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fucking clownshoes.

I had high hopes for him, but he's just another Hoffa.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Who knows, he may yet still be Hoffa.

[–] Hackworth@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

That reminds me, I need to order solar panels.

[–] clover@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

His whole speech was a call for bipartisanship and for all workers to unite along class lines. Aside from a tiny bit of pandering to the venue/audience which makes the rightwing audience more receptive to the message, he didn't endorse or praise the Republican party. If you want Republican voters to wake up and vote in their own interest, this is how the message has to go. It's also a great way to sow division within the Republican party.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Teamsters President Sean O’Brien praised Donald Trump as an ally for the working class and “one tough SOB,”

Yes, very bipartisan...

[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Lmao trump is a weak piece of shit. The weakest around. He can't even fire people to their face, he did it over tweets when he was president and never even told the person directly. God I'm remembering what an awful shit show his failure of a presidency was. Awful 4 years.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 20 points 1 month ago

I used to think this guy was half decent. Never mind.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Mmmmm daddy... More dirty tasty boots for my filthy little pig mouth!

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Thinking about his fattening bank account if fat orange pushes through his agenda

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah the angry orange is so tough he needs half a dozen guards keeping his candy ass safe

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Relevant Beau of the Fifth Column:

https://youtu.be/yStDsKSOP88

[–] ComradePedro@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

this man glows in the dark

[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It seemed to me like he was thinking what an excellent opportunity to reach a new kind of audience to further the objectives of the teamsters.

The attendees applauded a lot of statements, whether forced for pageantry or authentically, that is bound to get some gears turning.

And those who didn't applaud, well that's a different useful signal.

There's really a lot of opportunity for workers advocate to get good messaging out to this crowd. I would also point out that his address was probably the most substantive one of the whole convention so far.

The reality is Republicans will not disappear, they might even take majorities. Labor topics are super important to get out to them.

I thought this whole play was really interesting.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

He loves that billionaire money. Slurp

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Money and a hatred of the gays?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

That's the secret. By playing both sides he always comes out on top!

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It was him recognizing that for some reason there are still folks in labor that vote republican.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Dunno, but if I was a Teamster, I’d leave the union over that nonsense.

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 month ago

Nah, that just takes power away from working people. Organize militant committees within the union for the sole purpose of getting working politics into leadership positions. That is the play.

[–] 5in1k@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

I’m work in a teamsters shop. You can’t even get these idiots to vote on their contracts let alone start a splinter group.