this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
37 points (81.4% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3592 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Biden administration has released about half of the shipment of heavy bombs it has withheld from Israel since May over concerns the IDF would use them in densely populated areas of Gaza, a US official tells The Times of Israel.

In May, the White House announced a decision to withhold a shipment of 1,800 2,000-lb bombs and 1,700 500-lb bombs, with US President Joe Biden threatening to freeze additional offensive weaponry if Israel launched a major military offensive in Gaza’s southernmost city of Rafah where over one million Palestinians were sheltering at the time.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm ready to stop supplying Israel with bombs.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then talk to your congressman. Ultimately Biden can do a little more then delay. It's up to Congress to end it.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

He has veto powers. He hasn’t used them.

He can also enforce that law that says no weapons for war criminals.

With all the “the president can’t do that!” Bullshit on here you’d think he was a ceremonial figurehead and not the senior most leader of a co-equal branch of government.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which the Congress and the house would eagerly and quickly override. They are the ones who control it. Every single Republican would vote to override it and campaign on it daily. And far too many Democrats would do the same.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It takes 2/3’s and do you really think the DNC would after their own-party president just said “no”?

In addition to being POTUS, which is far from powerless, he’s also one of the single most (if not the single most) influential democrats in the DNC.

If he can’t get the dems in congress to respect his veto he has no business being president. Period.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It takes 2/3’s and do you really think the DNC would after their own-party president just said “no”?

If they were doing all this for Biden's sake, no. Problem is. They aren't doing this on Biden's behalf. It's a nearly century long project in the middle east. That far predates JRB's entry into politics. There are those with personal, financial, religious, and military reasons who when faced with a choice, would throw him under the bus for their own reasons.

In addition to being POTUS, which is far from powerless, he’s also one of the single most (if not the single most) influential democrats in the DNC.

He's got plenty of powers. I never said he didn't. Unilaterally ending aid to Israel isn't one of those.

If he can’t get the dems in congress to respect his veto he has no business being president. Period

Couldn't have put it more immaturely if I tried. I'm not a fan of politics. But I at least have an understanding of how things work. Everything is easy when you're an armchair quarterback. Why oh why did we let these people struggle to keep diverse coalitions together for decades. When we could have just put you in and be done.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ultimately Biden can do a little more then delay. It’s up to Congress to end it.

That you? (yes it's you.)

It's convenient for you that you went on about vetos and not enforcing actual laws. Which is entirely Biden's obligation. You know. The one that makes it illegal to sell or transfer US made weapons to, you know, people actively engaged in warcrimes...?

(sorry, I had to go look them up... for some reason I kept confusing the Hatch Act, probably because Pelosi is in the news for a blip...)

  • The Foreign Assistance Act; which prohibits any assistance to any entity "country the government of which engages in a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights"

  • Arms Export Control Act which says both empowers the president to enforce it unilaterally, as well as insist how the exports are to be used... and Israel is definitely violating that.

  • Leahy Law, which is actually 2 laws that do more or less the same thing (but DoD and State department restrictions) baring funding to units that are committing "Gross Human Rights Violations" we know that the IDF is doing things that qualify, as a matter of policy. The entire IDF should be barred from receiving aid under these laws. (and no, we also know that the government of Israel doesn't give a fuck about it.)

There's more. Biden's own CAT policy is supposed to prevent "arms transfers that risk facilitating or otherwise contributing to violations of human rights or international humanitarian law;" which is so blatantly obvious that Israel is doing.

So, he could, you know, enforce actual US law- laws that have been passed by congress and are on the books. he's the POTUS, that's part of the job. (and one might argue, an obligation, not a privilege.)

He’s got plenty of powers. I never said he didn’t. Unilaterally ending aid to Israel isn’t one of those.

The arms export control act gives him that power, actually.

Couldn’t have put it more immaturely if I tried. I’m not a fan of politics. But I at least have an understanding of how things work. Everything is easy when you’re an armchair quarterback. Why oh why did we let these people struggle to keep diverse coalitions together for decades. When we could have just put you in and be done.

Nice ad homenim. very persuasive.

If biden can't even get his own party to do the moral, ethical and legally-obligated thing... how do you expect him to get the republicans? further to the point, Biden is an avowed (christian) zionist. He's not just not enforcing the law...he's actively breaking it by facilitating and expediting new shipments, some of which without congressional approval.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That you? (yes it's you.)

I never said otherwise. And I'll say it again there's very little he can do realistically Beyond delay. That you think that this is some big gotcha moment. Some big turnaround in the debate is pretty absurd. Hilarious even.

It's convenient for you that you went on about vetos and not enforcing actual laws. Which is entirely Biden's obligation. You know. The one that makes it illegal to sell or transfer US made weapons to, you know, people actively engaged in warcrimes...?

No. What's hilarious is how agitated you're acting. You and I might classify it as a war crime and genocide. That's right we agree. I just have a better grasp of what can and is being done and will be done.

The problem is, the groups and bodies in our government that are supposed to make that proclamation/decision aren't. And I would say they're wrong in not doing that. And until they do do that. He would first need to petition them to actually classify and treat it as such. Before he would have any right under law to do any of that. Which I would argue that he should do.

I'm not saying that it's right or just. I'm simply saying that there are requirements under law for these things aren't met. And you and I both having a conniption fit over the fact that it obviously is unfortunately doesn't change anything.

None of these laws and Powers are really available to him until that point. It's b*******. But then so as much of politics. Believe me if things were as easy as armchair quarterbacks think it is. The world would be a Utopia. A perfect place. Not everything is unfortunately as simple as it should be or As It Seems.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What’s hilarious is how agitated you’re acting.

Imagine being upset about genocide.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Imagine being so bad at trolling. That that was your best reply.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

In May, the White House announced a decision to withhold a shipment of 1,800 2,000-lb bombs and 1,700 500-lb bombs, with US President Joe Biden threatening to freeze additional offensive weaponry if Israel launched a major military offensive in Gaza’s southernmost city of Rafah where over one million Palestinians were sheltering at the time.

And now that they've done that, Biden is bitching out completely and giving in...

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago