Eldritch

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

People want to believe that they're informed. Want to believe that they know things others don't. That they are wise. And will push back when challenged. Because they don't know the one thing every wise person knows. Just how much they don't know. Fools are confidently wrong. The wise are cautiously correct.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

That's because they're both a coalition, and their voters expect improvement. Often unrealistically from them. To the point that they let unobtainable perfection get in the way of whats achievable.

Whereas Republicans/conservatives are fickle. Driven by their fears. They don't expect or care about improvement. Just that "others" are hurt worse than them. The GOP itself found out the hard way that it isn't really power. Someone always eventually comes along with equally empty promises and rhetoric but simply a more extreme tone. To steal their sheep away. All that borrowed and abused power evaporating completely. Because it was never theirs.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Marxism doesn't call on the state to do that. That's leninism. Marxism is highly unobjectionable. The problem is how we get there. Marx himself spoke of an evolution over a long period of time in Society to arrive there. However humans desire immediate gratification. And thus that was unsatisfactory for most people. Which is where Engles, Lenin and others enter the picture. Who thought they could jump start communism/marxism using the very thing that kept communism/Marxism from being possible. The state.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

In my experience the kind of communists who want to shoot all the anarchists ....

You're confusing Communists with communists. They're very different. Anarchists tend to be communist. Therefore if communists were shooting anarchists they'd be shooting themselves. Anarchists want a classless stateless society based on Mutual Aid. Which is exactly what actual communist want. Communists on the other hand are a heavily class based society. With an overarching crushing state that commands everything. Destroying and slaughtering any dissent against the Vanguard party and it's oppression of the proletariat.

Communists are in no way communist. They are a completely different ideology. Often referred to as ml or Marxist leninist. And Lemmy is rife with them. They would get away imprison or Slaughter any communist or anarchist who spoke out against them or their perceived Revolution

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Aaaah the Herman Cain method. Be the best, like no one ever was!

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Please elaborate. How much is AIPAC giving in total. Who are the groups who could give more, but aren't. And why aren't they.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Not all Israelis are zionists. Not all zionists are israelis. You are still refusing to understand the full scope of things.

When Reagan broke the unions, single-handedly neutering the largest base of support for Democrats at the time. Groups like The aipac moved into fill that void. If Democrats could easily abandon aipac money by now they would have. As much as it would be morally correct to do it. It would be a bit of a political death sentence as long as money is considered speech.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Democrats are not a monolith. There are highly right wing wealthy democrats. And then there are Centrist to socialist Democrats Like Bernie Sanders etc. The Democrats are a coalition party. And unfortunately the only realistic party the left has at the national level due to the way the system works. So whether or not you like it you need to get used to acknowledging it. Not doing so is What's led to a lot of the division we're dealing with now.

Especially right now. A large chunk of Democratic Leadership is aging out or close to. A significant focused push could see a much more left-leaning Democratic Party. Maybe even someday a possible speaker Ocassio-Cortez. Parties, their make up, and their policy changes generationally. All we have to do is engaged with the system. Stop fighting for scraps on the side.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yes, that's the whole reason wealthy fascists, foreign governments, and Republican establishment fund and assist nominally left 3rd party challengers. Especially in national elections where they have no chance. Specifically to disadvantage Democrats and the left in general, helping fascists win. They've been doing it nearly a half century or more now.

Keeping the left divided is the best way to keep it out of power.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Republicans have en mass sought to defund or end democratic rights and institutions constantly. Both within the United States and without. For the last 50 to 100 years and you are skeptical? Trump held a coup in 2020 and should not have been allowed back on the ballot and you're skeptical? Our Supreme Court has gone out of its way to give him total immunity and you're skeptical? He said he'd be a dictator on day one and you're skeptical? The people who were in his administration and that he still surrounds himself with are the ones responsible for the fascist project 2025 whose goal is to overthrow the United States and you're skeptical? You're having problems with definitions. That's not skeptical. That's willfully naive or ignorant. Not skeptical. Listen to what they're telling you.

Yes! The institutions have been heavily rotted over the last 25 years at minimum. If not 50 to 100. Yes trump could deliver the finishing blow. He's only said he would. Many many times. And thank you for that straw man argument. Because absolutely voting is one of the least things. One of the easiest things anyone could do. And yet so many are seeming to fail so hard by not understanding the basics of how it works. Or what's actually at stake.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Any distro can do this. However the "user friendly" ones would tend to be the worst about it. Wanting to beep boop to get your attention for updates etc. I won't say which distro I use "by the way". But with Linux you are the admin. You own the system. You can disable noisy update notifiers or things that would wake the system. I had an HP elite book with garuda on it. I accidentally left it on and "charging" for several days. Thought it was unplugged and off. Didn't show any signs of life till I dropped something on the KB.

 

A fresh single and video off their upcoming third album Pendulum. I can't recommend this Duo from Texas enough. Their previous albums have been extremely solid for me.

1
What is Post-punk (en.wikipedia.org)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Eldritch@lemmy.world to c/postpunk@lemmy.world
 

Post-punk is a diverse genre that emerged from the cultural milieu of punk rock in the late 1970s. Originally called "new musick", the terms were first used by various writers in the late 1970s to describe groups moving beyond punk's garage rock template and into disparate areas. Sounds writer Jon Savage already used "post-punk" in early 1978. NME writer Paul Morley also stated that he had "possibly" invented the term himself. At the time, there was a feeling of renewed excitement regarding what the word would entail, with Sounds publishing numerous preemptive editorials on new musick. Towards the end of the decade, some journalists used "art punk" as a pejorative for garage rock-derived acts deemed too sophisticated and out of step with punk's dogma. Before the early 1980s, many groups now categorized as "post-punk" were subsumed under the broad umbrella of "new wave", with the terms being deployed interchangeably. "Post-punk" became differentiated from "new wave" after their styles perceptibly narrowed.

The genera itself being foundationally typified by groups such as Siouxsie and the Banshees, Wire, Public Image Ltd, the Pop Group, Cabaret Voltaire, Magazine, Pere Ubu, Joy Division, Talking Heads, Devo, Gang of Four, the Slits, the Cure, and the Fall. But not limited to. And has spun off many sub genera such as alternative rock, dark-wave, cold-wave, synth-wave, synth-pop, and some indie rock

view more: next ›