Liberty Hub

303 readers

1 users here now

No Discrimination, this includes usage of slurs or other language intended to promote bigotry

No defending oppressive systems or organizations

No uncivil or rude comments to other users

Discussion, not debate. This community is exclusively for genuine logical debate, any comments using whataboutism or similar will be removed.

No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.

These guidelines are meant to allow open discussion and ensure leftists and post-leftists can have a voice. If you are here to learn, then welcome! Just remember that if you're not a part of the left (Liberals don't count) then you are a visitor, please do not speak over our members.

founded 10 months ago

MODERATORS

kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone

TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone

484

Open discussion (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 3 weeks ago by TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/libertyhub@lemmy.blahaj.zone

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 35 points 3 weeks ago

can confirm. Is cute.

[–] AoteroaHeritage@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Only women?

I’m a (mostly) straight man and I think they are hot.

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

That damn smile

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Down catastrophic?

[–] Hazzard@lemm.ee 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's an exaggeration of the expression "down bad" which means to be very attracted to someone.

I assume "down bad" originates from being "down" to do something. I.E.

"You want to get something to eat?"

"Yeah, I'm down."

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks, yeah that exchange you just gave as an example makes sense to me. The use of an adjective after it threw me. Hadn't noticed that before

[–] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

John Hinkley has entered the chat

[+] Sparrowette@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago

To deny the reality that conditions in the US are continuing to push more young men towards fascism, and the necessity of having real material solutions to the root cause of that rightward shift, is to refute the working class revolution's ability to meet the needs of all oppressed peoples - and we are all oppressed under capitalism.

Personally, I'm interested in exploring the idea of a culture that rewards and incentivises militant direct action (executing the owning class) as a method for disaffected people to find community and solidarity among their peers.

[–] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

What an absolutely wild generalisation with just a light dash of US defaultism.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Whatever your reasons for voting for Trump it absolutely does include controlling women’s bodies, intentional or not.

That’s how it works, package deal.

[–] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It completely ignores the fact that the male loneliness epidemic is a worldwide issue and not one specific to the US, because as hard as it may be to believe, men outside of the US exist too.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago

You can use your imagination and substitute whatever local far right politician you have. The hard shift right is also a global phenomenon.

Instead of complaining that a thread about an event in the US is defaulting to US discussion topics...

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

How is it "US defaultism" when this is specifically about US events? It's fine if you have a dislike for the US and/or Americans, but this is going to an irrational level.