this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
263 points (84.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

25324 readers
1712 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m talking about this sort of thing. Like clearly I wouldn’t want someone to see that on my phone in the office or when I’m sat on a bus.

However there seems be a lot of these that aren’t filtered out by nsfw settings, when a similar picture of a woman would be, so it seems this is a deliberate feature I might not be understanding.

Discuss.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 128 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a huge Anime fan, with some catching up to do, I've blocked every anime adjacent community, because NSFW filtering isn't applied as strictly as I would prefer, on the Anime communities here.

I enjoy a good sexually charged image as much as the next person, perhaps more.

But I scroll Lemmy in front of my impressionable daughter sometimes.

I would like to catch up on Anime recommendations, here.

But, to me, it's just not worth the risk of suddenly needing to explain to my daughter why Faye Valentine's parents didn't love her enough to buy her full sets of clothing.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

!anime@ani.social mostly posts key visuals and posters, episodes discussions, and news. Stuff you'd see in public.

The actual fanart side of things tends to stick to !anime_art@ani.social and !animepics@reddthat.com

[–] Qkall@lemmy.ml 88 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Op, if my HR dept saw me scroll by that pic... It would be an annoying conversation. Like while I'll agree, there's no nudity... I would get in trouble. I've left some chatroom due to this... People just don't understand that I don't care but the folks cutting my checks will make a thing of it

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 71 points 1 week ago

As much as I like looking at pictures of anime girls I think they should be marked as NSFW if they are barely clothed.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago

I think if you wouldn't use it as your wallpaper at work because it is inappropriate for work, that's NSFW. So yeah at my job that would be NSFW.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I am of the opinion that there should be more granularity to NSFW than a simple binary.

I'm a fan of how e621 does things:

rating:s (safe)

rating:q (questionable)

rating:e (explicit,)

But I would add another:

rating:t (traumatic, known elsewhere as Not Safe For Life)

Call it "purity" and allow users to filter posts to allow or block any arbitrary combination of purity levels (wallhalla, formerly wallbase, does this if you want to see how it could work).

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I feel like the Internet needs more tags:

  • Explicit (rude language, nudity, etc)
  • Porn (nsfw legacy tag)
  • Violence
  • Not safe for life

Something like that.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

These aren't even enough.

The tag for this particular problem would be something like "mildly suggestive" because it's literally just skin that some people don't want to see.

[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I agree. I do sort of understand op's consternation. I don't browse Lemmy on my work PC, but sometimes on lunch or in public I pull it up on my phone on All communities and I'm suddenly conscious that everyone beside me can see the "sfw" furry and anime art that I scroll past.

However, that's kinda my fault. I don't want to ban those communities because I like that stuff. It's just a little odd that we call it sfw when, to be honest, I have a hard time picturing most work places where I live happy to see that on my desktop.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder if Lemmy could easily do content warnings like on Mastodon. I don’t know if it’s part of the ActivityPub spec but it’s definitely a thing that’s been implemented elsewhere.

[–] Aedis@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

The answer to "is it part of the activityPub spec?" is more often than not a strong No.

[–] anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’ve seen sites that have something similar, including a “suggestive” tag for pics like OP’s.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago

Of course it should. NSFW doesn’t mean too hot to handle. It means, I don’t want coworkers or customers seeing this on my screen, as a matter of professionalism.

[–] crossover@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I just want posts or communities to have category tags for me to block by tag. So I can block all anime and every non-English community.

I have nothing against them. They’re just not of interest to me and I don’t want them on my feed. Blocking a community is mostly useless because there are so many of them it’s like playing whack a mole.

[–] EdanGrey@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

I completely agree... Most of my block list are 'moe' communities, and it is only getting longer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MinorLaceration@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

I 100% would not want an image like that to pop up in front of a coworker. I'm on board with you, OP.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 30 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Which half?

NSFW is not safe for work, so if it wouldn't fly at work.... it should be marked.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Agree, if I scroll past it and someone looking over my shoulder is going to call me a weirdo, it should be NSFW.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

Yes.

The tag is Not Safe For Work. I'd say that if you were to look at this in most work places you'd probably be speaking to HR within the hour...

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 24 points 1 week ago
[–] Toastypickle@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wish there was strictly an amine tag so I could filter all that shit out like you can with nsfw. Blocked countless weirdass communities that randomly popup.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

These are a few ways to get rid of them:

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wjs018@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Where the NSFW line is drawn varies depending on the moderator and community. If there are communities that are either not moderated actively enough or draw that line too far to one side for your taste, then don't subscribe or block those communities. Those tools exist there for a reason.

I would not consider the post you have linked to as NSFW. I also think that the NSFW tag has evolved over time, so perhaps my definition of NSFW just doesn't line up with what today's standard should be. There are plenty of anime characters in very popular shows that have a character design similar to that. There are big billboards of them some places to promote the show. Just because it might be NSFW in your work environment/region, does not mean it is everywhere.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Shimitar@feddit.it 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That would be perfectly acceptable where I live and work. No nudity, no tits, no genitals, move along...

On the other hand, anime in general is relegated to teens more than not here, so any anime would raise eyebrows if seems browsing from my phone by others given I am definitely not a teen by large.

YMMV, but different cultures different sensibility.

Should Lemmy be a MCM or a MCD? I think this should be the question.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I just block the people that post them, and the sub it's from. I almost never see that shit now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago

Yes, you could get in trouble at work for viewing it just like you said a picture of a real woman would be

[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, they should be. For the same exact reason anything that is taboo but socially acceptable but definitely unprofessional should be. Real boobs, cartoon boobs, it doesn't bother me at all but it makes me very much less likely to browse lemmy in a public setting. Setting morals completely aside, if you want this platform to thrive, you'll have to be compassionate to the consumers of it, the user base. The community can definitely make this thing not usable if they want to. It's about being practical.

[–] Moghul@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

NSFW has become code for porn, effectively. My friend and I use NSFO for 'not porn, maybe not even nudity, but not necessarily appropriate for the office'. Maybe that's what we need. A second filter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why do these anime girls always look like they're in their teens? Extremely creepy.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Because the target audience is usually teens.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ludrol@szmer.info 14 points 1 week ago (7 children)

This whole problem would be solved by adding more tags as per this proposal: https://github.com/LemmyNet/rfcs/pull/4 and enabling more filtering.

but @dessalines@lemmy.ml and @nutomic@lemmy.ml didn't look at it for months and I don't know what is their stance on it. The dev that wanted to implement it doesn't want to spend energy to push forward for a green light.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes. Problem is that NSFW has lost its original meaning to a lot of people. NSFW was originally to hide things that might be controversial to be visible on your screen in a workplace, so it should be fairly conservative. Beachwear would 100% not be safe to look at in a work environment.

But now a lot of places are using it to determine what is safe to look at not in front of your boss, but in front of your kids or in public. That is a much different thing. NSFW flags should not be used to restrict kids from seeing it, just your boss. There needs to be a separate flag for hiding things from kids. And because social norms are different in different societies, there should be even more granularity in the flags. Nudity is just one thing that is NSFW.

NSFW should be reserved for blocking things that I don't want to suddenly appear on my screen when I'm browsing the Internet on my break at work when I'm allowed to browse the Internet, but it wouldn't be good for a naked picture to show up on my screen suddenly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

When browsing in All or similar, there's a non-zero chance of coming across things that can be offensive, explicit, or disgusting. You shouldn't encounter anything pornographic or where people die or get horribly injured, but that is my only expectation.

I browse in thumbnail view for that reason. It's enough to see if I want to see a full image, if it's not something I want to see, I didn't get hit full blast by it, and if it's something I don't want people around to see at that moment, it's much harder for them to see it and faster to scroll past.

When you select a sort that pulls from every community, it's you asking to see everything. Death, injury, and private parts are about the only things the bulk of society can agree are at least somewhat offensive, so those are the only things you should expect to see blocked by a NSFW filter. Lewd, gross, and offensive are still free to pass, for better or worse. That's the Internet culture has existed for most of its existence and feels pretty universal in my experience.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (16 children)

If the NSFW limit was put on "image of a woman wearing shorts and sports bra", would you run to shut down the break room TV when they showed such obscene NSFW things like the Olympic games with their skimpy track and field and beach volleyball outfits? All of those communities would obviously need to be marked NSFW on Lemmy too.

And while NSFW indeed does come from the words "Not safe for work", it isn't "blur everything that wouldn't be appropriate for my coworkers or boss to see me browse during work time".
Getting caught watching episodes of My Little Pony would be pretty inappropriate and embarrassing during working hours as well.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›