All the military guys i’ve ever met have been super racist so I’m not counting on it.
this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
251 points (97.0% liked)
politics
19126 readers
2282 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
So, are you guys all in favor of just "leaving them alone?" Serious question, should there be no repercussions for illegal immigration?
Yep, all in. I feel there should be freedom of movement. I am in the minority perhaps. Most people want “reasonable restrictions”. In my experience this always raised my grocery prices and reduced my friends.
I think most people really don’t care one way or the other. Some people want all them far away, but here in Texas this is normally older anglos who yearn for yesterday and are scared about Spanish. But even most of those don’t have too strong feelings about it
Like trans rights, these are all blown out of proportion on national tv and newspapers. Most people really don’t care here
Not at a military level, no. Law enforcement is more than adequately equipped to handle it.
I’ve got to be honest. It’s a non issue for me. I can’t figure out why people always get so pissed off about it, or why those people are usually the least likely to have interacted with an immigrant (legal or otherwise). Seriously, what do they care? I don’t think governments have any right to disrupt the natural flow of people from one place to another.
"but was dismayed to learn of Trump's plans to declare a national emergency and use the military to carry out mass deportations of undocumented immigrants">
What?!? You mean the author had no idea about this "plan" DT wouldn't shut up about for the past 9 years?
I think our media is problematic
The US military is aggressively apolitical. They're not going to refuse orders from the CiC without those orders being blatantly and explicitly illegal.
For someone that likes their world history, you really haven't learned much from US history.
My argument here is that the US military is absolutely going to cooperate.
The orders will be blatantly and aggressively illegal though...
More likely is that they'll go through a lawyer to be worded in such a way as suggests ambiguity of legality insofar as the responsibility of the US military to follow the orders is concerned.
Pretty sure Trump's going to post it on Twitter at 10pm, but we'll see.
I mean, it doesn't matter what Trump says initially. Like how the Muslim-ban definitely wasn't a Muslim-ban once it was challenged. The lawyers will shift the argument while Trump continues using the rhetoric.
"Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal"
-- Richard Nixon.
The whole mass deportation thing is blatantly absurd. There won't be a mass deportation. There might be an attempt at a mass deportation, but there's no way a bunch of guys who can't figure out how to book a room at the Four Seasons are gonna figure out all the problems. There's just not the resources or other places to detain, move, and deposit that many people. It's the Wall Part II. It's just gonna be the existing policy, but with press conferences claiming they did something.
To be a little fair, the military is very competent when it wants to be. If the military was onboard with the plan then the most competence the Trump team would need would be to give them the order. They'd start cordon and searches on the daily.
The military isn't on board though.
Yeah the military will do the equivalent of shuffling around the same 4 papers making themselves look busy. They may be deployed somewhat but yet again its the military, ive met a couple E4 vets and those bastards could procrastinate and maliciously comply like no other I can only imagine what a general or major could do.
Most officers had to figure out malicious compliance early in their careers too. For the ones that didn't, they have a Sergeant Major, who most assuredly spent time as an E-4.
Y'all always getting the enlisted men mixed up with the officers. They are not the same. The officers, from the top down, will not go for this.
Been saying since the first Trump admin, he will eventually enlist civilian bully-boys for the task. Red Shirts if you will. It's obvious the military brass won't go along. It's obvious there's not enough state or local officers, of any kind, to do this.
And lookee here! Steve Bannon's already saying the obvious and talking about enlisting "local help". Perhaps we shall call them Committees of Public Safety?
If I was a fascist looking to carry out mass deportations I would probably just give federal badges to young veterans and police officers willing to do so. I get mass deportations with no resistance in the ranks and a powerful paramilitary force I can deploy to squash protests after my secret police of convicted white supremacists infiltrated them and caused violence.
Sure it might take a few months to setup and a few years to really get going but it will be faster than trying to burn through enough officers to get an entire chain of command willing to follow illegal orders.
More likely is that all the business owners employing undocumented immigrants will whine about it — like has happened in Florida and Texas whenever their legislatures are on the verge of passing some law that would take away their cheap labor.
This is exactly why it will unfortunately work. You go to far too many doctors dentist whatever's offices. You will see Fox News or worse. Even at the VA you'll see Fox News etc. When it comes to the officer core and career military people you might see some push back. But most of the enlisted will be on board for this day one sadly.
The military is about 60/40 partisan. But beyond that they are also extremely pro Constitution. It's entirely possible that they agree mass deportations are necessary, but will not follow the illegal order to go round them up. There's not a whole lot of hardcore MAGA beyond the low ranks because Trump has spent the last 9 years insulting the military in every way he can. Including denying casualties and stealing school funding for military kids. No amount of Fox News allows the combat arms community to forget stuff like that.
The very idea that the military is all die hard Republican is a Fox News myth.
Its amazing how much propaganda Americans are exposed to on a dailly basis.
Hollywood basically a propaganda machine that always paints the US as a superior power.
News agencies at all levels repeating the same stories from a predefined script.
They're not unique but yes absolutely. They can wake up in the morning to the Sinclair local TV news propaganda. Listen to AM radio propaganda on their way to work. And come home to unwind to Fox News and oan propaganda in the evening they can basically go a whole entire day without contact with the truth.
You are absolutely correct, the USA is not unique in this regard. Its difficult to spot propaganda when living inside the bubble
load more comments
(7 replies)
A military without sufficient officer cooperation is incapable of anything beyond banditry
There will certainly be commanders who resist if they think it's unlawful. We may just need to wait to really see. I hope there will be resistance.
It's a potentially comforting thought. Until you realize. That those are the people Republicans are targeting at the behest of trump. He had babysitters in his first term. It's time he's going to get his loyal Hitler generals. And he will Purge both of the military and the civilians bureaucrats from their offices in order to install loyal sycophants.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Alternative headline: Why It Will Definitely Happen
The end game of this would be a military coup of the US government which is probably not the worst thing that could happen. Sadly i am not confident that the soldiers have the balls to do it.
I mean maybe not the worst but pretty fucking bad I’d say. Look at Egypt. Just because your enemy is in power doesn’t mean a military junta would be better.
If your population cant agree on whether they should build concentration camps or not, then i think they need a bit of civil war as a treat. Nah but really it cant go on like this, they need some big change and that wont happen without some big conflict.
You mean if someone reminded them that they could be court-martialed and imprisoned for violating Posse Comitatus?
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›