this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
429 points (97.4% liked)

World News

39082 readers
2770 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky warned that Ukraine would lose the war if the U.S., its primary military supporter, cuts funding.

Speaking to Fox News, he stressed the importance of unity between the U.S. and Ukraine as Russia accelerates its territorial gains.

Zelensky acknowledged Ukraine’s challenges on the battlefield, despite new U.S. weapon supplies, including long-range missiles and anti-personnel land mines.

He criticized German Chancellor Olaf Scholz for engaging with Putin, calling it a risky move.

Trump has pledged to end the war quickly but offered no specifics.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

That was kind of the point. Trump, Putin and Netanyahu are playing everyone. Started the Gaza attack knowing Americans move on and will forget about Ukraine once Gaza is in flames and he was right. Americans don't care about Ukraine anymore, they've moved on and voted with Putin. Just waiting for the next conflict now that will distract everyone away from Gaza

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 20 hours ago

Trump: Oh no that's horrible, on an unrelated note heeeey Putin how that deal going for a Trump tower in Moscow

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Frankly speaking Russia and China would have a great opportunity to try to appear sane for Europe when Trump gets into office. Like offer an actual peace for the price of giving a huge middle finger to USA. Trump admin seem to be begging for us to do it anyway.

I suspect that this is a pipe-dream and they will not do that, and also for Russia their credibility is pretty much gone and I don't see any way they could restore it.

China might be able to pull it off though.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-reviews-plan-halt-us-military-aid-ukraine-unless-it-negotiates-peace-with-2024-06-25/

Trump's plan is just to force Ukraine to hand whatever the Russians have taken over to the Russians, or whatever or they stop getting aid.

The Kremlin said any peace plan proposed by a possible future Trump administration would have to reflect the reality on the ground but that Russian President Vladimir Putin remained open to talks.

The Kremlin said any peace plan proposed by a possible future Trump administration would have to reflect the reality on the ground but that Russian President Vladimir Putin remained open to talks.

So Putin's puppet will let them take what they have under control..and knowing Trump and Putin, probably more, like sanctions or stripping Ukraine of more autonomy.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world -5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds better than a proxy war.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee -1 points 11 hours ago

Yep if NK wants to attack SK they should do it directly instead of having their proxy invade one of SK's arms suppliers.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

If US cuts funding it would be abandoning its allies in violation of the Budapest memorandum which the US signed in '94 to protect Ukraine if Russia invades, and that violation from Russia since 2014 also grants Ukraine back its nuclear program which should have been supported by allies like the US. The only language a dictator like Putin understands is violence or the threat of violence, look at the nuclear saber rattling he does frequently and how people and nations capitulate to it and the only neighbors they avoid are either nuclear armed or NATO allied.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

There is no treaty that the US has with Ukraine that obligates the US to defend Ukraine. Stop spreading misinformation.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 3 points 16 hours ago

It is technically not a violation, the memorandum just gives the US and the UK "the right" to intervene, but not the obligation...

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (6 children)

Well, if it violates the Budapest memorandum of 1994, of course Trump will change his mind. /s

That aside, it only would kick in if Russia used nuclear weapons, anyway. Link to the text. The present effort is all about trying to keep Europe safe through deterrence, and to a lesser degree supporting a democracy that's under attack.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Unfortunately the Budapest Memorandum doesn't obligate the US to actually protect Ukraine.

Hopefully Europe can fill the gap left if Putin's puppet cuts support US support

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 87 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Right? Before the election I had a political conversation with a coworker who leans more conservative and she was excited about Trump “making peace with Putin”. It was a serious wtf moment for me. “Peace” with Putin means pulling funding for Ukraine and letting Russia roll over it.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 35 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I had an argument on here with a supposed green party voter who "hated trump", but admired him for his sincere efforts to end wars.....

I reminded them about ending the nuclear deal with Iran and then assassinating their most idolized military commander. He just went on to admit he didn't care about a war with Iran.

There are so many "green voters" who are just trump supporters turfing as leftist on this site.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Give em full air support. If it causes world war 3, it causes world war 3. Fuck it. Avoiding that isn't worth letting Russia just consume its neighbors on a whim - that shit certainly won't stop with Ukraine.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if it causes ww3, it will be a lot less bloody war than what will be if russia is allowed to recover and take over next country

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Maybe if WW3 breaks out, Biden won't hand over power to the literal fascists that are already making decisions to cause our demise.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

wow yeah I hope we have global nuclear apocalypse so we can avoid the consequences of elections! totally worth.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

These people are unhinged. This is just Reddit 2.0.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I'm glad the traditional American desire to fuck up the world because you feel upset is alive and well. that was really fun in the 2000s.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Russia is also already instigating it with having North Korean troops in the combat zone. It'll just be a tit-for-tat response.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm all for America funding as much as possible, but FFS Europe, the monster is ringing your doorbell.

[–] Metz@lemmy.world 82 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

That reads as if the EU is just sitting on its hands and doing nothing. Please keep in mind that there is significant financial support coming from the EU:

image

Source: https://www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/

Where the EU cannot compete with the US is in the supply of military goods. For the simple reason that these do not exist to the extent that the US has them.


Edit: I have to correct myself in a detail. The graph of course shows Europe not the EU. So it includes e.g. the UK as well. The point still stands though looking on the rest of the data.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Nice sources! Puts things in perspective for me. I really mean that.

Still doesn't change the fact that the enemy is at the gates. And has been for decades. And it ain't America's gates. Which is not to say, "Not our problem." It eventually will be our problem.

Europe has to spin up a war economy. Yesterday. We Americans have the privilege of being able to do that with two oceans buffering us. Europe has no such buffer. Once again, the filthy Russians are knocking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] r00ty@kbin.life 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Europe ARE doing a lot. We just don't have as much of an aging stockpile of weapons as the US does. Also when turned into financial contribution you need to convert it to a percentage of GDP.

Well, turns out someone made that data available.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1303450/bilateral-aid-to-ukraine-in-a-percent-of-donor-gdp/
https://www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/

Europe most certainly are doing their part.

However, that's not the real fear. The USA is going into a new presidential term, a term where the house, senate and the supreme court are going to likely side with the president on most things.

The USA can put significant pressure on European countries. If we're to believe Trump is really working in Putin's favour then, as well as stopping US aid, there's not too much stopping the US pressuring Europe from doing the same. That is my real fear. I think without US support this is hard, very hard for Europe to fill that gap. But, we certainly can still try.

[–] deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago

To add some context to the numbers. Coming from Denmark which tops the chart, I can tell you that the top donors are getting sick and tired of big countries e.g. Germany and French providing way less resources. Bigger economies and military industries, yet the small countries of Europe donate the most. Different political situations of course. Still crazy that Germany are sort of "meh" considering their history with Russia.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Quick! Someone find out if trump will give a shit. Report back here with your findings.

load more comments
view more: next ›