this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
177 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19127 readers
4561 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

State charges included kidnapping, first-degree burglary and false imprisonment of husband of Nancy Pelosi

The man who was sentenced to 30 years in federal prison for attacking the husband of Nancy Pelosi with a hammer in their California home was sentenced on Tuesday to life in prison without the possibility of parole following a separate state trial.

A San Francisco jury in June found David DePape guilty of charges including aggravated kidnapping, first-degree burglary and false imprisonment of an elder.

Before issuing the sentence, Judge Harry Dorfman dismissed arguments from DePape’s attorneys that he be granted a new trial for the 2022 attack against Paul Pelosi, who was 82 years old at the time.

“It’s my intention that Mr DePape will never get out of prison, he can never be paroled,” Dorfman said while handing out the punishment.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 29 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

“This is a man who has always been a peaceful, law-abiding person up until his activation,” Lipson said.

When given the chance to address the court before his sentencing, DePape, dressed in prison orange and with his brown hair in a ponytail, spoke at length about September 11 being an inside job, his ex-wife being replaced by a body double, and his government-provided attorneys conspiring against him.

“I’m a psychic,” DePape told the court, reading from sheets of paper. “The more I meditate, the more psychic I get.”

And the attorney wants them to reconsider the sentence? Sounds like he needs some serious therapy, and institutionalized, not let out.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 18 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

“This is a man who has always been a peaceful, law-abiding person up until his activation,” Lipson said.

Oh fuck all the way off, asshole. His brain was rotted from right-wing media- there was no secret hidden sub-programming which could be turned on with a code word.

Also, fuck you again. Everyone is a peaceful, law-abiding person until they decide to break the law.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Until they're caught breaking the law, anyway.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Did they not try an insanity defense? He must have been declared competent, I guess.

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

My understanding is that insanity defense has a very high bar, beyond what the public would commonly consider "crazy", so it's not actually something that happens often. And even then, actually getting out of whatever institution you're remanded to isn't guaranteed.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I dont want to armchair assess too much, but reading a statement that involves your psychic powers, assuming that's real, the guy is not mentally fit.

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

I agree that the man is clearly off his rocker, but from a legal perspective, what matters is whether or not you understand that you have, in fact, killed a dude, and that this is in fact a bad thing. Having voices in your head telling you to do it is a completely separate issue. Again, this is my understanding as a layman, so any actual lawyers please feel free to tell me I'm full of shit.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 16 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Just think, voting for Trump means you’re voting in a pardon for this guy.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Life sentence is from the state charges. President can’t pardon that. But, yeah, he’ll pardon the federal charges if he gets the chance.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Will he? He said he'd pardon a lot of people when he was still able and never did. He only cares about people with power or fame, not nobodies like this guy.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 2 points 49 minutes ago

I guess it depends on whether he needs to rile his base. The GOP already has them frothing at the name “Pelosi”. He might do it as an intimidation tactic. Hopefully, we never find out because he never gets the chance.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee -1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

That does not sound real. If a presidential power to pardon is unlimited except in the case of impeachment, why would that matter? Even Congress can’t stop it.

[–] procrastitron@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

@athairmor@lemmy.world is right; presidents cannot pardon state level crimes: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C1-3-1/ALDE_00013316/

Specifically, the offense must be “against the United States”, and state level offenses are only against the respective state, not the United States.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Because it's unlimited for federal crimes only.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 25 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 29 minutes ago* (last edited 29 minutes ago)

Prison-as-a-mental-healthcare-system should not exist. Of course, that would require leadership that is neither conservative nor neoliberal.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

How long before Trump calls him a patriot and a political prisoner?

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 hours ago

My mind hadn't even gone here yet, so I wasn't ready, and I was appalled rather than just being quietly furious with certainty that this will happen, probably tomorrow.

[–] midnight_puker@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago

Taste the hammer of justice, scum.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago

Good riddance.

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Hammer time!

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

ITT: "Leftists" who love the police state and draconian punishments.

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemy.lol 3 points 1 hour ago

I don't know, I ain't no huge fan of the "law and order" types. But cracking an 80something year old dude in the head with a hammer is pretty fucked up.

The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Guardian:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Guardian is generally reliable. The Guardian's op-eds should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. Some editors believe The Guardian is biased or opinionated for politics. See also: The Guardian blogs.
Wiki: mixed - Most editors say that The Guardian blogs should be treated as newspaper blogs or opinion pieces due to reduced editorial oversight. Check the bottom of the article for a "blogposts" tag to determine whether the page is a blog post or a non-blog article. See also: The Guardian.


MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/29/david-depape-sentenced-paul-pelosi-hammer-attack
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The comments here are pretty gross. This guy needs help, instead you're happy to send him to the corrupt American prison system for the rest of his life. Please stop bootlicking and start caring for people.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I also despise the prison industrial complex and prefer rehabilitation over punishment, but there's a point where losses need to be cut.

He doesn't seem remorseful, and he's not going to seek help when he believes he is justified in beating an elderly man with a hammer. At that point, what options are left? it's immoral to involuntarily institutionalize and forcibly medicate individuals, and even if it wasn't, that's a slippery slope you don't want to go down.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee -3 points 1 hour ago

I also despise the prison industrial complex and prefer rehabilitation over punishment

Uh huh. Sure. Let's find out how much.

but there's a point where losses need to be cut.

Ah, the answer was "not at all".

He doesn't seem remorseful, and he's not going to seek help when he believes he is justified in beating an elderly man with a hammer.

Okay.

At that point, what options are left?

Rehabilitation? Mental health care? All of the things that European countries do better than us?

it's immoral to involuntarily institutionalize and forcibly medicate individuals

But somehow in your book it's perfectly moral to lock them in a cage until they die? I'd take medication and institutionalization over being tortured to death any day.

and even if it wasn't, that's a slippery slope you don't want to go down.

Ah yes, the slippery slope of not throwing people away like pieces of trash. Would hate to fall down that one... /s