this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
64 points (89.0% liked)

politics

19170 readers
5026 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 100 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump's entire political career has been absolutely riddled with what should have been career-ending PR disasters. Nobody can seriously believe that this one, or the last one, or the next one, will somehow be the one to do him in.

[–] 1800doctorb@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While I 100% agree, his own surrogates like Peter Navarro are trying to distance themselves from Tony’s set. This means that Trumps team at least thinks this is a problem.

Additionally, I don’t think there exists a realistic single event that will cause Trump supporters to leave in droves, but there are hundreds of thousands of Americans with Puerto Rican heritage between Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Maybe this encourages 10% of them to go vote if they were originally planning to sit this one out. 50k more votes for Harris would likely make the difference.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

The 2nd largest community of Ukrainian immigrants lives in Pennsylvania as well. Remember, 'Feivel Goes West: An American Tale' is about a Jewish Ukrainian mouse family.

Trump team is fucking up with a lot of immigrants stories. I hope they all come out to vote this year....

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

His voters, angry white man-children, love the joke and the pain it has caused. They are weak, scared, and angry and hurting people makes them feel better about themselves.

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Based on the 2020 results, he had (somehow) been making some inroads with some Hispanic voters. But between the report that he was big mad about the military having to pay for a funeral for a murdered soldier with a Spanish surname and this clear disdain for Hispanic citizens, maybe it's becoming clear that in the eyes of Trump and his supporters, there is no such thing as 'one of the good ones'. The best you can hope to be is someone they haven't gone after yet.

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 week ago

The best you can hope to be is someone they haven’t gone after yet.

Chilling because it's true.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

His base is aggrieved white men. He just can't help himself.

[–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

drumpf supporters always find a way to justify what he says and then develop a new more disgusting opinion that matches. How long until PR MAGA are explaining how PR really is trash and only their diapered Messiah can MIGA?

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not a PR disaster because it might cost him his base. The question is whether it will cost him people in the middle who don't particularly like that shit. It probably won't,but if there's a chance it costs him half a point I'll take it.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Exactly. His base loves the hate.

Hopefully the Mexican and Puerto Rican voters realize that he hates them.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Until he is literally caught, on film, live, in the act having sex with a child, there’s no such thing as a PR disaster for this guy. Even then, millions will still vote for him.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It would have to be a young male child of color for even a small portion of his base to care.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

And even then 90% would say it was fake and AI generated

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago

Trump would just accuse Kamala of raping an even younger, even darker skinned child and his base would clap their hand and coo and drool and continue to babble on.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

They’ve show they don’t care about the sexual abuse of young boys and they certainly don’t worry about such things as people of colour being human beings.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What, pray tell, do you think the Russian P-tape is? It has nothing to do with urine. The letters that follow the P are E D and O.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Remember how Rudy behaved in that hotel room in Borat 2? Imagine how these people act in a foreign nation where the wealthy, and corrupt politicians seemingly get to do (quite literally) anything they want.

Now imagine it's the 90s and Trump is close friends with perhaps the world's most prolific pedophile/pimp...

If it isn't an underage sex tape, then it's him fucking his own daughter. What else could it be?

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I wouldn’t put it past him, but at this point if such a thing surfaced his fans would just claim it was a deep fake. For it to work, it would have to be broadcast and lib in front of an audience. Even then, the cognitive dissonance might be too strong for many to overcome.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Haus@kbin.earth 12 points 1 week ago

Upvoted for the excellent pun. (For context, major Puerto Rico fuckup by the Trump campaign. )

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

Trump has been a PR disaster since day 1. His cult does not care. He could walk out on stage and shoot someone and then continue on with his speech.

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Fully half of Americans are r̶e̶t̶a̶r̶d̶e̶d̶ bigots.

[–] TheCelticPirate@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I agree with your point. Can we not use retarded?

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eh. 20-30.

Half of voters.

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

That's a good point, are voters dumber and more bigoted than your average American?

A significant part of this problem is age. At some point we lose the right to drive because our facilities fail. We never lose the right to vote.

The biggest problem is first past the post. The solution is proportional representation and 16-60 voting age. Only then will you see any meaningful change.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Trump IS a PR disaster

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

They are lining up their scapegoat.

Politico - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Politico:

Wiki: reliable - Politico is considered generally reliable for American politics. A small number of editors say that Politico is a biased source.


MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2024/10/29/trump-faces-a-p-r-disaster-00185998?nname=playbook&nid=0000014f-1646-d88f-a1cf-5f46b7bd0000&nrid=0000014e-f0ed-dd93-ad7f-f8edad790000&nlid=630318
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support