this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
562 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

58690 readers
3863 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] leds@feddit.dk 5 points 2 hours ago

AI seems perfect for renewables load balancing. Got extra power to burn because it is windy at night? Train your models

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

Boy are they gonna look stupid when they realize that no one outside their little bubble has a use for AI.

It’s not even close to ready for launch and why are we wasting energy on it?

[–] Don_alForno 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Nuclear has never been profitable without massive government subsidies and guarantees, and ~~Google~~ Kairos too will either manage to collect those or lose money.

It’s unclear how Google and Kairos set up the deal — whether the former is providing direct funding or if it just promised to buy the power that the latter generates when its reactors are up and running. Nevertheless, Kairos has already passed several milestones, making it one of the more promising startups in the field of nuclear energy.

I guarantee you, they are shouldering on none of the risk (like the Chinese and French at Hinkley Point), and this startup will be going down.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Yay, more ads to pay for Google’s reactors.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Lol, now just let AI manage the reactors, then give it access to manufacturing tech and we have every machine takeover scenario ever.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 41 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

For some reason this doesn't feel like good news.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Any nuclear adoption is good news. This WILL help destigmatize them and help reduce cost by production at scale. Overall, while it's extremely questionable, depending on how many companies get on board it could be net positive

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

This WILL help destigmatize them and help reduce cost by production at scale.

I'm not saying this won't have any benefits. I'm saying that I don't trust Google or the AI craze much, let alone huge corporations in general.

So I'm worried that there might be unforeseen fuckups or "savings procedures" or other ways of squeezing out profit until something breaks.

And those fuckups can easily outweigh the benefits.

If we had good governments and reliable regulation, this would be absolutely thrilling. But we don't, do we?

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

One step closer to the Fallout games becoming reality, which is at least potentially cool in some ways.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 22 points 8 hours ago (9 children)

After they decide to abandon their AI project can we use them for something meaningful?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›