this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
188 points (98.5% liked)

World News

37466 readers
2614 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 67 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Truly a Sophie's Choice for centrists. On the one hand fascism, but on the other what they believe is somewhat inefficient economics and unnecessary social rights. It must be agonizing for them.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Should I watch Sophie's Choice?

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes it’s great film about moral issues forced upon us through life. It’s about facing shit that wasn’t up to you. Shit that has no “good” resolution. Shit that represents all the hardship and problems that go unspoken until there isn’t another option.

It’s not a causal, easy watch. But yea watch it and be better off. We are all better off if more people watch it.

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I know it as a book. I think I saw the movie once, but wasn't impressed. The book is a very good introduction to philosophy.

Edit: I just realized that I was talking about "Sophie's world", not "Sophie's choice" so ignore my comment.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know, I've never seen it.

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 60 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So everything now hinges on centrists and "moderate" conservatives not supporting fascists?

Terrific! It's not like that has ever happened before

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

Not left, not right but ~~center~~ somehow ever farther right.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 38 points 2 weeks ago

Weimar Republic vibes. Will conservatives think they can control fascists and that they "won't be that bad"? Hopefully they come to their senses, but I'm not holding my breath.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean that was the point of Macron's gambit. Don't let it wait. Strike while you've still got a chance instead of dragging out a loss. Its going to be interesting to find out if this works.

[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Macron destroyed the traditional two parties by doing exactly this. Scaring voters away from the two extremes by monopolising the moderate voices. Only opposition becomes extreme idiots

[–] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Thats wrong. Macron could not do any of this even if he wanted. Polarization is related to the instability of a regime. Capitalism is in deep crisis and the extreme positions start growing, while center positions become weaker until they cease to have any meaningfull existence. Its also naive to think that you can go back to when centrism was viable. Its not a matter of liking it or not, its how it works. Macron isnt dictating how history progress, its history that will do a driveby over Macron

[–] Pancito@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Capitalism IS the crises

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Macron was the centrist alternative last time around. He eroded his support by the way he conducted the country, foremost by how he unilaterally pushed retirement legislation through against the will of the parliament.

So he had a hand in undermining the centrist position so in a way he did dictate historical progress.

[–] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And he did it for personal reasons or because french capitalism needed it?

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

That's besides the point. I do personally think that reform was necessary, but his action opened up a can of worms if the RN ever gets to deliver a presidency.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Repressions for the people or slight inconveniences for the rich.

They’re gonna choose the people, aren’t they?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

.... aren't they? 😐

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Is there a chance Macron would lean towards the FN? My impression was that even the conservatives are slightly reluctant to be associated with racists like that.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago

I would love to hear what's going on from the perspective of centrist living in France right now (as opposed to what the media says).

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In the words of Childish Gambino, This Is America.

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

In the words of Smash Mouth, "I need to get myself away from this place."

[–] Rayspekt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

In the words of Shrek and to the far right: "Get out of my ~~Swamp~~ France!"

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'd have gone with Eric Burdon