this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
188 points (98.5% liked)

World News

37466 readers
2674 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Macron destroyed the traditional two parties by doing exactly this. Scaring voters away from the two extremes by monopolising the moderate voices. Only opposition becomes extreme idiots

[–] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Thats wrong. Macron could not do any of this even if he wanted. Polarization is related to the instability of a regime. Capitalism is in deep crisis and the extreme positions start growing, while center positions become weaker until they cease to have any meaningfull existence. Its also naive to think that you can go back to when centrism was viable. Its not a matter of liking it or not, its how it works. Macron isnt dictating how history progress, its history that will do a driveby over Macron

[–] Pancito@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Capitalism IS the crises

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Macron was the centrist alternative last time around. He eroded his support by the way he conducted the country, foremost by how he unilaterally pushed retirement legislation through against the will of the parliament.

So he had a hand in undermining the centrist position so in a way he did dictate historical progress.

[–] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And he did it for personal reasons or because french capitalism needed it?

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

That's besides the point. I do personally think that reform was necessary, but his action opened up a can of worms if the RN ever gets to deliver a presidency.