this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
1436 points (97.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26428 readers
3026 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Not wanting to do free work for a company (they don't even give you a discount if you use self-service) is being a boomer?

That's the first time I've seen the word "boomer" on the opposite side of the word "sucker".

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Refuse to do free work for a company—insist that the grocery store employees go and gather the items on your list from the shelves for you! Never set foot on the sales floor, do pickup orders online only!

Background: It used to be that the proprietor of a store brought items you requested to the counter for you. In 1916, Piggly Wiggly pioneered a new grocery store model, requiring/allowing the customers to pick items off of the shelves themselves. Not only did they not give you a discount for doing their work for them, they raked in more money from impulse purchases. The increased sales more than offset the increase in shoplifting losses. A cynical, corporate ploy to bleed customers dry, and we just think it's normal now!

That is to say, the purpose of a grocery store is to provide food in exchange for currency. There's no law of nature that I know of that says that having an underpaid teenager drag your food across the scanner is the only proper way to do check-out, just like there isn't one that says only a store employee can pick items from the shelf.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 180 points 2 days ago (13 children)

The Boomers are right sometimes, like about keeping email.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 80 points 2 days ago

Yeah, this response is a rare boomer W.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I refuse to use them as a union worker, when I'm told to use the self checkout as I'm in line for the only cashier I just refuse. I'm doing it for you kids

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Haha, I am using the "I don't work here" line 🤣

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The self checkout is a perfectly viable option, so long as Walmart can find the strength inside themselves to open 3-6 manned tills on a Sunday for folks with large carts or children. Nothing is more demoralizing than getting up to the checkouts after a huge shop and finding there isn't a single till open whatsoever. Throw in a four-year-old who wants to help scan every item and you're ready to burn the store down by the time you leave.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

I'd just abandon my shopping at that point and go somewhere else.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was once mistaken for an employee somewhere and my sleep deprivated response was to say "I am wearing pants so clearly I dont work here." I have no fucken clue what that means but I think it was a threat.

[–] bitwaba@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We're you at a strip club?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 129 points 2 days ago (17 children)

I've never understood the people who seem to not get that some people actually don't mind scanning their stuff and putting it in bags, and insist that that's the line between what the customer does and the employee. They also used to carry your groceries to the car for you, and you can also get them to pick everything up, bag it and bring it to your car or house. It's not like the checkout process is the special part that can't change.

Yeah, they want to save money by having fewer people get more customers checked out faster. I don't really care since the part I like, getting finished at the store, happens faster.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 101 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I don't have a problem with self-check. I use it most the time because I usually have < 10 items.

I DO have a problem with only self-check lanes being open or only ONE regular clerk check lane open. both of which happen at walfart.

I know this because I used to work there and policy was to hire floor associates that can run a register so the store won't need to pay for cashiers just standing around.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] ntma@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I like hanging out in parking lots at Walmarts and to scam boomers coming back with a load of groceries

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 72 points 2 days ago (44 children)

I mean, walmart could easily fix that by having fucking cashiers.

At the walmart I go to they put in like 60 self checkouts and have, maybe, one cashier running at a time.

I don't mind self checkout as a concept. Its fine if you are just buying a couple things, or something you might be personally embarassing for you.. but they are not a replacement for cashiers.

Cashiers and belts are needed to handle bigger purchases like monthly groceries and shit.

Unless you are gonna take 25% off my bill for labor savings, I am not going to take my monthly shopping through a self checkout. I had to once when I had no choice, and I'll never do it again.

load more comments (44 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 80 points 2 days ago (8 children)

My parents refused to use the self-checkout because “They take people’s jobs.”

They were hardcore republicans perfectly happy to make sure those jobs got paid shit.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I'm on Team Boomer on this one.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] neonred@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This says much about respect and social competence in this society when the first instinct is to mock and abuse someone with different priorities than yours.

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago (15 children)

When they are that rude and stupid they have it coming

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] anachronist@midwest.social 18 points 2 days ago

Corporate gaslighting be like:

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (43 children)

So this is pro-self checkout? Why would you be pro self checkout? Besides the extra time and effort for the customer to check out if they have more than a couple items, I recently read an article saying that even for the companies they haven't worked out: besides the problems and delays they cause where they have to provide employee assistance anyway ("Unexpected item in bag", etc), they've lost more to theft and are having to spend more money on adding more anti-theft tech, etc. One company they interviewed is phasing them out.

(edit after reading some comments) The article also talked about people getting in trouble for accidentally not getting something scanned.

load more comments (43 replies)
[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 41 points 2 days ago (12 children)

Recently had a support call with a woman who was complaining about our 2 factor authentication system because she could only access one web page at a time. When I asked her if she couldn't just open a new tab, she said she was too old to learn how computers work and couldn't do that. She went on to claim that there's a lot of people at her level of ineptitude, and that we shouldn't have implemented 2fa because "most people don't have multiple monitors."

It was so, so hard not to throw out an OK Boomer as they proudly lectured me on the depths of their ignorance.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›