this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
600 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

58593 readers
3952 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I suspect that this is the direct result of AI generated content just overwhelming any real content.

I tried ddg, google, bing, quant, and none of them really help me find information I want these days.

Perplexity seems to work but I don't like the idea of AI giving me "facts" since they are mostly based on other AI posts

ETA: someone suggested SearXNG and after using it a bit it seems to be much better compared to ddg and the rest.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You know what I miss? Search engines that honored Boolean operators. I am often looking for niche results and being able to -, ! and NOT is incredibly useful. But that's just not a thing anymore. I know part of it is that SEO includes antonym meta data that ruins this but it would still be helpful on occasion.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’ve been using Mojeek lately and it looks like their advanced search can do some of that.

https://www.mojeek.com/advanced.html

Reminds me of early Google search.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I have it a test with some operators from the search bar instead of using the form and it did exactly what it was supposed to. I'll keep this on hand. Thank you.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You only tested Google and Bing.

Qwant and DDG both use the Bing architecture.

I agree though, search engines have become noticeably worse the last 2 years.

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

I’m pretty sure they discovered in the google monopoly case that google realized a couple years ago that a worse search experience would not negatively impact their bottom line. So makes sense

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kagi is great. It’s a paid service but you can try 100 searches for free.

You can use the Orion browser on iOS and set Kagi as the search engine.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The day i pay for search engines is the day i finally finish my 2020 new year's resolution

Enjoy your war against ads then. I’m not against supporting content, I just wanted a better model than invasive ads.

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's intentional.

Obviously, Google makes money showing ads during search. But they have finally bit the bullet and starting tarpitting users in search in order to show more ads.

A quick, useful, and accurate search means that you're on their site for the least amount of time, perhaps mere seconds. That's not what's best for revenue growth.

PS: Go try Kagi and be reminded what good clean search results look like. I use it because my time has value. It's very good.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So what about open source self hosted search engines? If it requires some hardware I'd gladly team up with a small group of people to finance a bigass server that just gets us our personal search engine

Any good ones out there?

[–] LonelyNematocyst@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

There's stuff like Searxng or whoogle, but these aren't "real" search engines, merely "search aggregators" - they relay requests to a bunch of actual search engines, like bing or google, and aggregate the results. That's why they don't require tons of compute and scraping, and also why they often fail to work (since the search engines in question don't like or allow this). I believe it's not feasible to run a "real" search engine alone or even as a small group of people - according to this comment you need a powerful server with terabytes* of drive, hundreds of gigabytes of RAM and a lot of compute - and all of this will just let you crawl some top domains, nowhere near a good chunk of the internet.

*which sounds low actually, I would have expected more for this

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Searxng, but there are plenty of instances already

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It becomes more and more true every day.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Jesus, the "plandemic" explanation for why the Internet is dying. The Internet IS clearly dying, but this is stupid. Even if we got rid of all the bots and AI, the Internet would still be dying, because open protocols are not as exploitable as walled gardens. The value of capital in the world overwhelms the value of human labour and human interest, and all our social structures conform to the needs of capital over time.

[–] sandbox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn’t really, it’s just that human activity on the internet is more and more taking place on platforms without any search indexing. 20 years ago, internet forum are where you’d go for advice online. Nowadays, it’s more and more becoming discord servers and similar, which just aren’t indexed by internet search.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 25 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Kagi is working very well for me! and honestly i like that it's a paid service.

[–] darreninthenet@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

Another vote for Kagi here as well... except for searching for local businesses near where I live, I revert to Google for that, but I Google through Kagi so privacy is somewhat protected

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Whats funny and kind of sad, is that they know exactly what you're searching for, and don't give any fucks about showing you that, and instead will show you this cool other thing that they're getting their beak wet on thats like, eh... kinda related to what you typed in. Google didn't get dumber, they just don't have any meaningful competition which would force them to deliver high quality results, and instead of enshittified their results to the point where they're practically useless.

[–] Fedditor385@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

There are no search engines besides Google and Bing, because everyone else just uses Bing under the hood.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Hasherm0n@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Lately I google for someone that should give me a direct, exact result. First five links are fucking paid ads.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 119 points 2 days ago

It's not just you. Search got worse, and it did so intentionally.

Ed Zitron lays it all out really well, with all the receipts, but the basic version is this; Google has an incentive to make you search more for the same things, because then they can show you more ads. And google is, first and foremost, an ad delivery company. Every "product" they own is an ad delivery vehicle. It's not just AI slop that made search based; Google made search bad, and everyone else followed suit, to a greater or lesser degree.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago

It's not just you. At some point, search's primary purpose went from "finding the information you're looking for" to "getting paid to put links in front of you". Then they kept iterating on it, quarter by quarter, for a very long time.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Kagi is pretty awesome

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Infinitely worse. I barely use search engines for issues these days and no longer recommend that people "Google" things.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 61 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is, and it's not just the search engines to blame.

The content out there is incredibly spammy. It doesn't pay to create good content. It pays to make a pool of AI gunge based on what people search for and then stick ads on it.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Spam sites laden with key words and massive SEO to farm advertising dollars from clicks long predated AI

It doesnt help that big search engines like google have realized people will go as far as page 2 or 3 to find the results, so intentionally worsen their search results to increase ads being served.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 152 points 2 days ago (47 children)

they're pretty bad, but ddg at least feels like I'm getting actual results.

load more comments (47 replies)
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The whole internet is in the process of being filled with garbage content. Search engines are bad but also there's not much good content left to find (in % of the total)

load more comments (1 replies)

I agree with you. It has gotten worse.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Its not AIs fault, its advertising based SEOs fault. Search has been broken for years for many topics.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 36 points 2 days ago (3 children)

My experience is that search engines are still decent at finding niche information that would normally be hard to find. But for anything mainstream, for instance any household product that should be easy to find information about, instead how about these 300 pages of top 10 lists of Amazon affiliate links buried under AI generated filler?

[–] JollyG@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I often have the opposite experience when looking for technical documentation about programming libraries. For example I will be dealing with a particular bug and will google the library name plus some descriptive terms related to the bug, and I get back general information about the library. In those cases, it seems google often ignores the supplemental information and focuses only on the library name as If I were looking for general information.

What is worse is that the top results are always blog-spam companies that just seem to be copying the documentation pages of whatever language or library I was looking at.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

theyve all been bought and paid for and not by you.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The other day I googled how long should I broil a ribeye steak and the google AI told me to broil it for 45 minutes.

Broil is the hottest setting on the oven and you’re supposed to broil the meat as close to the burner as possible. This would probably burn down your house.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Huh...Can't replicate that claim (though I would believe it happening)

On the 20th Sep. I asked my Google Home if it would be raining.
It responded that it would rain. I asked when it would rain.
Home responded with "Today it won't rain."

Like what? 5 seconds ago you said it would. No weather report reports rain. Where did you get the first response from??
And I could even replicate it (have it on video)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nick@midwest.social 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Kagi is good. I’m very happy with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hannesh93 70 points 2 days ago (35 children)

I'm very happy with kagi at the moment. Just crossed one year using it as my main search engine last week and don't see why I would go back.

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] Arkhive@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

4get.ca

Has been very refreshing to use. It’s a bit slow, and you need to do a captcha periodically because they get hella bot spam. It’s got a clean interface, no sponsored results and other junk, and so far it’s felt like “old google” more than anything else. Plus they have my preferred color scheme as a built in option!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I feel it is intentional. They are god damn good at hearing my talking about a baby and shoving all baby videos and social media post in every corner for ad revenue; yet when I search about something trivial I cannot get an answer.

Even AI becoming useless the last couple of weeks compare to a few months back where it gave details answers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 26 points 2 days ago

I'm going to be honest with you. They feel no worse today than they have for the past ~5+ years or so. SEO blog spam with a dozen paragraphs to tell you exactly one line of information have been around for quite a while. Many of these articles felt generated either from crappy writers or "AI" tools predating the LLMs we have now.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 52 points 2 days ago (2 children)

SEO spam has been a problem for a long time, but AI has allowed it to be accelerated to a whole new level.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zante@lemmy.wtf 43 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Not just you.

DDG has deteriorated to absolute nonsense, I’ve used it for years and years.

Recently gave startpage another go - maybe marginally better but still really poor

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›